The guy taking my place doesn't want to move teams back like I used to do. No big thing really.
2-2 tonight. Seattle died in the 9th.
Looks like Oakland may win this one. Cant count it though.
5RC
- Thread starter cisco
- Start date
The guy taking my place doesn't want to move teams back like I used to do. No big thing really.
2-2 tonight. Seattle died in the 9th.
Looks like Oakland may win this one. Cant count it though.
- Nov 3, 2006
- 22
- 0
- 0
Ok guys so the plays today are Pitt +1.5, bost, wash, sea +1.5, and Cleve +1.5??
I just want to make sure I know whats up before I risk my dough. Thank u for understanding
Also can someone explain the basis for these plays? Whatever it is seems like its getting the job done..
Are the under .470 plays stronger?
Good luck
I just want to make sure I know whats up before I risk my dough. Thank u for understanding
Also can someone explain the basis for these plays? Whatever it is seems like its getting the job done..
Are the under .470 plays stronger?
Good luck
Hey cisco, 1st of all love you system & thanks again for all this great info. One thing I don't understand u posted above 2-1 record last night but put 22-0 ytd, how do u figure that? Just curious. Thanks again man!
its a chase
you have to continue betting larger and larger amounts until the last game 'wins'
Plays are correct. Wash up 2-0 T8.
You cap and you cap and you cap...and you lose. You spent all night capping this game. No way Halladay should have lost that game 9-0 to Randy Wolf. "It's just not logical"
In my mind there is no logic when it comes to baseball. That's why I choose to chase. I don't care who's pitching, who got hurt or who today's umpire is.
IX_Bender is correct.
Chasing:
To win back gambling losses with more gambling.
If you lose game 1 you play again betting what you lost plus another unit the same size as your original bet multiplied by the odds.
example:
4 game chase to win $100 and odds of -110
g1 -110 to win 100 and lose
gm2 110 +100 x 1.1=231 and lose
gm3 110+231+100 x 1.1=485.10 and lose
gm 4 110+231+485.10 +100 =926.10 x 1.1= 1018.71
If you win you get all of your money back plus $100 and the chase is finished.
If you lose, you lost $1734.81 and the chase is finished.
You can lower your risk, but it won?t return $100.
Betting risk bet on the first game.
Bet RL-1
Bet RL -1.5
Use the Labourchere betting method.
I posted 3-1.
Hey Cisco, I appreciate all of the great info and I apologize for not being very bright but just to clarify, Seattle is not covering right now and if they lose does that mean that you will chase on Pittsburgh??
If that is what you are doing then I would guess that if Pitt loses then you would chase on Cleveland.
Just wanted to make sure I had this right:shrug: :shrug:
Thanks again for your posts!!!!!!!!:toast:
If that is what you are doing then I would guess that if Pitt loses then you would chase on Cleveland.
Just wanted to make sure I had this right:shrug: :shrug:
Thanks again for your posts!!!!!!!!:toast:
Each chase is seperate. If Seatle doesn't cover today..you bet em again next game..
Ohhhhh so you're chasing the team.
Thanks V!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :0008 :0008
I'm an idiot :jump: :jump: :jump:
Thanks V!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :0008 :0008
I'm an idiot :jump: :jump: :jump:
Almost. If Chicago wins we bet against them again. Maybe Oakland next.
You're not betting on Seattle but against Chicago.
All of those blue cells on the spreadsheeet. You are betting against those teams.
So sea lost today I bet $200 at -170 so i lost 340. Tomorrow I'd take 340+200 x 1.7 + juice? I think I screwed this up! Bear w me cisco, thx
Check that,on sea I'd take the $340 I lost today + $200 x whatever juice is for sunday? So if the juice was 170 on $100 tomorrow for Sea I'd times $540 x 1.7? So I'd bet $918 on Sea?
