YYZ cold here as you may know. Im wondering how this thing stayed open so long. Thunder everything I had said Colorado to. Lets get it back tomorrow. My other idea Ark took it on the chin to. Well maybe tomorrow it will be sunny.
6% play
- Thread starter THUNDER
- Start date
Blue Jay said:to much rain here in Toronto.....
i agree man....feels like england.....:moon:
dark, damp and wet......
oh wait....maybe that was my date last week.....:shrug: :brows:
TORONTO-VIGILANTE said:
Chris,
for the record....I don't think you should classify going out with BeantownJim as a date...
:nono:
djv said:I want to meet her. It was a her?
LOL....!!!
Yes, it WAS a her......:nono:
wtf this thread was locked- who picked it? well anyways it gives me a chance to respond to lil Bobbie's yet another lame-assed attempt at saying something funny- you ain't got it Blu and never will- now go crawl back under your Notre Dame blankie with Mr PD and have another game of 'Grab one for the Gipper'
I knew it........This thread was fixed!
It was locked, but I guess a call to the booth had the decision overturned!
A call to Infinity showed that Mad Jack had the "over" for a substancial amount.
I booked a lot of action locally, and am getting the serious 'stink eye' from many players up here since I had to rate the play "no action".
It was locked, but I guess a call to the booth had the decision overturned!
A call to Infinity showed that Mad Jack had the "over" for a substancial amount.
I booked a lot of action locally, and am getting the serious 'stink eye' from many players up here since I had to rate the play "no action".
Going Gone - Here we go again, people making blanket statements without having the necessary information to back up their claims. I assume your shot at Fletcher concerned the fact that if he gives out a play on the forum, he is screwing his clients. And if he gives out a play here, he is screwing the forum. You couldn't be MORE wrong!!! In fact Fletcher gave out an 8 unit play tonite in NCAA hoops. Was he screwing his clients? No he wasn't. He had shut down the service after making 9.2 units on Monday. His service is all about money managment not playing a bunch of games every day. So nobody got the shaft - not the clients who had shut down, nor the forum that saw the 8 unit play win with ease. Sometimes it is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.
My favorite is the people who go pay after having really horrible seasons and stopping posting their record one they realize there's no salvaging it.:nono:
S-Love said:
Surprise surprise, a gay thought enters your mind & comes out on paper. I'll tell you this for the last time, I'm not into that & I don't think BBC is either. I don't have anything against it as a whole but I'm not into it so please stop dreaming about it.
Thank you
yyz said:
man, its cold and windy down here in the Texas Hillcountry today, didnt see many bucks, but shot a few coyotes and one hog
For anyone who cares, Thunder does post his record and everyone elses on his paysite. Click on the link "Our Stats".
UT-Longhorn said:man, its cold and windy down here in the Texas Hillcountry today, didnt see many bucks, but shot a few coyotes and one hog
how about the Waco ladies?
bjfinste said:
Yeah in revenge for his longhorns getting blitzed by the hogs earlier this season
ferdville said:
Hold the phone.
Is that how a service works? If you finish on the plus after day one, you stop? (I am making the assumption that the week starts on Monday.) So, if you lose on Monday, does that mean you are "chasing" until you catch up? Now, I have no personal beef with any of you guys who go pay. Good for you if you can make a go of it. But this does seem to be a little below board.
If people respect a guys plays enough to pay for them, they will bet his freebies, too. I have no idea how Fletcher ranks his plays, but I'll bet that 8 units is pretty tall. Now, if this play loses he can say, "It wasn't one of my client plays"? IMO, if he is "done for the week", no more plays should be posted.
I know the main object of a service is to make you money, but you seem to be compromising too much if you hold back on plays because, "they might lose". ALL plays can lose!
Maybe I am not seeing something here, but it seems quite odd to do it that way. If the idea is to "quit the week a winner", then it would stand to reason that the plays would become higher in value, and more frequent, if you lost the first few days. (An actual client would need to confirm this.)
ferdville said:
#1 I am not taking SHOTS at anyone, I can express my opinion about any subject I ever wish to.
So you are telling me he left an 8* on the table and gave it to us,well good for us. I'd never pay anyone for picks but if I was I'd sure be more than annoyed a tout was giving me some 4* plays and giving an 8* out for free.
Let me make it easier for you to comprehend-
The tout is selling diamonds to his clients, sells them an 8* and (2) 4* for 1000, oh it's 5pm time to close up shop, what the hell I have an 8* left I'll just give it to the gal waiting for the bus on my way home. Not Happening. If there were any real investment by the tout in his picks these free picks would be non-existent.
That is why paying for picks is a joke
You are WRONG FOOL!
