90+% on the RAMS around the forums
- Thread starter T
- Start date
You can agree all you want about forum posts and services being on the Rams, but the original
Post also mentions ?the public is not on the Ravens? and ?if the RAMS win, the books get destroyed?. Those statements are very, very wrong
Post also mentions ?the public is not on the Ravens? and ?if the RAMS win, the books get destroyed?. Those statements are very, very wrong
- Sep 1, 2012
- 10,923
- 1,396
- 113
Simple. 9 out of 10 posts here were on the Rams. Go look yourself. 12 out of the top 15 touts were on the Rams and that other crazy forum EVERYONE was on the RAMS and multiple GOW or GOY stuff.:mj07:
Maybe those people should take their posts to the betting window then, because books are losing with the Ravens cover. Your statements I referenced above are false.
Yes. Simple.
Yes. Simple.
- Sep 1, 2012
- 10,923
- 1,396
- 113
Cool. I won that's all I care about. Always gonna be people who think they are right. :142smilie
Last edited:
We tried to tell them T
We tried to tell them T
Some ppl are so hard headed. Every forum on the Rams. Have 2 friends that book and both a little heavy on the Rams. Line opens at 3.5 and drops to 3 at some places but everyone on the Ravens :mj07:
We tried to tell them T
Some ppl are so hard headed. Every forum on the Rams. Have 2 friends that book and both a little heavy on the Rams. Line opens at 3.5 and drops to 3 at some places but everyone on the Ravens :mj07:
Baltimore climbed to a 3?-point favorite Monday at all Las Vegas sportsbooks.
?Right now, it?s our biggest liability of the year on any game,? The Mirage sportsbook director Jeff Stoneback said Monday afternoon. ?Thankfully, the Packers did not cover. Otherwise, we?d be looking at a seven-figure liability.?
?We?ve gotten some sharp money back on the Rams at plus 3? (minus 105),? Stoneback said. ?But it was nothing to even dent the liability we have on the Ravens.?
Look at this ?fake news? as well...
PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO THE SECOND TO LAST PARAGRAPH, T Savant....
It was the biggest game of the year for sportsbooks ? and the result was never in doubt.
The Baltimore Ravens blew out the Los Angeles Rams, 45-6, crushing books from Las Vegas to New Jersey, as public bettors flocked to wager on the red-hot Ravens as 3.5-point favorites and the over of 47 points.
?This is the worst single game outcome [of the year],? MGM?s Scott Shelton told The Action Network. ?But it could have been worse. We took a $110,000 bet on the Rams before kick.?
While the book made back $110,000 on that last-minute Rams bet, it got cleaned out by a host of big wagers and parlays on the other side, including one bettor who won $260,000 on a two-team parlay that included the Ravens (-3) and the Seahawks (pick?em).
Another MGM bettor won $50,000 on a $57,500 bet of Ravens -3.
MGM certainly was not alone, as every bookmaker I heard from on Monday needed the Rams to win outright. A Ravens high-scoring blowout was as bad as it could?ve gone for sportsbooks.
?Ravens and [the] over results in us giving back about half of what we won yesterday,? the SuperBook?s John Murray said. ?Worst-case scenario.?
PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO THE SECOND TO LAST PARAGRAPH, T Savant....
It was the biggest game of the year for sportsbooks ? and the result was never in doubt.
The Baltimore Ravens blew out the Los Angeles Rams, 45-6, crushing books from Las Vegas to New Jersey, as public bettors flocked to wager on the red-hot Ravens as 3.5-point favorites and the over of 47 points.
?This is the worst single game outcome [of the year],? MGM?s Scott Shelton told The Action Network. ?But it could have been worse. We took a $110,000 bet on the Rams before kick.?
While the book made back $110,000 on that last-minute Rams bet, it got cleaned out by a host of big wagers and parlays on the other side, including one bettor who won $260,000 on a two-team parlay that included the Ravens (-3) and the Seahawks (pick?em).
Another MGM bettor won $50,000 on a $57,500 bet of Ravens -3.
MGM certainly was not alone, as every bookmaker I heard from on Monday needed the Rams to win outright. A Ravens high-scoring blowout was as bad as it could?ve gone for sportsbooks.
?Ravens and [the] over results in us giving back about half of what we won yesterday,? the SuperBook?s John Murray said. ?Worst-case scenario.?
You need to remember that the huge chunk of posters on these sites dont bet a nickel of real money on anything. Ever. So, to translate 90% of the posts into actual "action" at the window, is wrong.
When an actual Vegas bookmaker says they would get slaughtered if the Ravens cover, it means much more than Johnny Salami over at xxxxxxx.com saying, "Rams Huge!!!!"
And you won, T. Which is great. But you won from the ?square? side.
Enjoy the winnings, despite the bad info
:0071:0071:0071:0071
Enjoy the winnings, despite the bad info
:0071:0071:0071:0071
He won after the game was decided as usual >>> never a whimper before
I give you "Who You Got ??? Clueless !! Some of us post winners before games start .. And have been doing it for 18 plus years !!
- Sep 1, 2012
- 10,923
- 1,396
- 113
Oh scammer. You sad and pathetic loser. You can?t pick a winner if your life depended on it...You?ve resorted to teasers you suck so bad. You can?t teach STUPID. Scammer 🤣
I post before games start!! have for 30 plus years !! U have no clue so brag after games are over Talk about a sad pathetic scammer !! No one on this Forum will live long enough tp see you post a winner how about a wire to wire winner >>> Like Yours Truly !!Gotta suck to be you Sorry and sad !! /COLOR][/SIZE
Now ????????? Who U got ya lil Knuckle Drager !!
- Sep 1, 2012
- 10,923
- 1,396
- 113
Here you go you stupid fat fuck.
http://www.madjacksports.com/forum/showthread.php?659108-1Q-SD-1-5
Now...
:stfu:
