a 4yo child dies

saint

Go Heels
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
9,501
140
63
Balls Deep
Do you see anyone pulling up statistics for poor parenting? I think the parents are an afterthought for most. Someone says a four year old got killed and everyone starts talking about Pit bulls (it's not Pitt bulls either, they're not from Pittsburgh. Not directed at anyone in particular, just saying) and it isn't until someone mentions the parents. Then everyone's on board, but that isn't what most people think about. Look at some of the posts. Saint intimated that this was good for raising awareness against the breed. No mention of parents.

Hope this helps,
FDC

So are you saying pit bull owners by and large are bad parents and golden retriever dog owners are good parents. Racist.
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,763
309
83
61
Fort Worth TX usa
So are you saying pit bull owners by and large are bad parents and golden retriever dog owners are good parents. Racist.

With all the extensive dialogue already posted by me, this is what you were able to glean from its content? I said nothing of the sort. You calling me a racist is tantamount to dead person telling me I don't look so good.

How the fuck would this make me a racist in the first place? You would think with as much time as you spend in the deep end of the bigotry pool you would know what the fuck racist means.


My point is people can't have it both ways. You can't say the parents are at fault and put the dog down. I would explain this to you in depth but I am all out of crayons, dolls, and Play-Doh


Hope this helps,
FDC
 

saint

Go Heels
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
9,501
140
63
Balls Deep
With all the extensive dialogue already posted by me, this is what you were able to glean from its content? I said nothing of the sort. You calling me a racist is tantamount to dead person telling me I don't look so good.

How the fuck would this make me a racist in the first place? You would think with as much time as you spend in the deep end of the bigotry pool you would know what the fuck racist means.


My point is people can't have it both ways. You can't say the parents are at fault and put the dog down. I would explain this to you in depth but I am all out of crayons, dolls, and Play-Doh


Hope this helps,
FDC

It doesn't. I was just trying to get a rise out of you. My comment was so preposterous it's comical. Have a good weekend Kujo.
 

UGA12

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 7, 2003
7,779
108
63
Between The Hedges
FDC? IYO would you say that an average pit pup raised from birth in a "good" household is more, less, or equally as likely of "attacking" a child as an average Labrador raised in the same "good" conditions?

Lets just say that attacking means hospital or worse.
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,763
309
83
61
Fort Worth TX usa
FDC? IYO would you say that an average pit pup raised from birth in a "good" household is more, less, or equally as likely of "attacking" a child as an average Labrador raised in the same "good" conditions?

Lets just say that attacking means hospital or worse.

It has been my experience that the odds are equal. While I am sure there are numbers that will support otherwise, out of the hundreds of dogs I have placed, none..............not a single one.............has bitten anyone. I only deal with what are considered to be the "dangerous breeds". Meaning, Rotties, Mastiffs, Shepherds, Pitties, Dobermans, and yes Labradors. Every single dog I have ever placed has also received more that forty hours of training. That is actual hands on training, one on one.


I am not denying that there are more reports of pit attacks than other dogs. What I am saying is that they are almost all avoidable with the proper training.


Hope this helps,
FDC
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,763
309
83
61
Fort Worth TX usa
I do not agree with this

May I ask as to why you don't agree?

I ask because this is exactly the type of thinking I would like to see changed. Dogs NEVER ever ever ever attack for no reason, They are either being territorial, are sick, or are reacting to being threatened. None of us have any idea what happened in that house preceding that attack. Was the kid poking it, kicking it, was the kid fucking with the dog. I would be willing to bet that he or she was. That is the case at least 90% of the time. Were the parents home at the time of the attack and watching the kid? Where did they get the dog from? Was it from a breeder that raises fighting dogs? Was it a dog that was used for fighting and they adopted the dog from a shelter without knowledge of this? Trust me, that dog did not attack a sleeping innocent little baby in her crib. Something caused that dog to attack. So why kill the dog? Place the dog in a home that has no kids!!! I am not getting on you brother, you know that, I am just saying that the majority of people would say kill the dog just like you because it bit a kid, and they say that without any knowledge whatsoever of the circumstances surrounding the event. Just like most people here that are saying put the dog down. Are we really in a position to arbitrarily kill anything we want simple because we don't understand what happened. That is not the type of person I want to be that's for sure. I would be willing to be a lot of money that the kid did something to provoke that dog. I remember a "Dog Whisperer" episode recently where the parents of a three year old boy couldn't understand why the dog growled and barked at the kid all the time. It was a little maltese mix and the dog eventually bit the kid. Cesar Millan decided to put a couple of hidden cameras in the house to see what was going on and sure enough there was the little boy kicking the hell out of the dog in the backyard when nobody was watching. What a surprise right? Dogs don't just wake up from a nap and decide to eat the baby then have a snack.


My point is this, we as humans like to think that we own the earth and that we get to be lord high executioner of all things that don't do it exactly the way we want things done. Maybe, just maybe, we should pay a little more attention to who we bite, growl at, and attack.



Hope this helps,
FDC
 

smurphy

cartographer
Forum Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,914
140
63
17
L.A.
May I ask as to why you don't agree?

I ask because this is exactly the type of thinking I would like to see changed. Dogs NEVER ever ever ever attack for no reason, They are either being territorial, are sick, or are reacting to being threatened. None of us have any idea what happened in that house preceding that attack. Was the kid poking it, kicking it, was the kid fucking with the dog. I would be willing to bet that he or she was. That is the case at least 90% of the time. Were the parents home at the time of the attack and watching the kid? Where did they get the dog from? Was it from a breeder that raises fighting dogs? Was it a dog that was used for fighting and they adopted the dog from a shelter without knowledge of this? Trust me, that dog did not attack a sleeping innocent little baby in her crib. Something caused that dog to attack. So why kill the dog? Place the dog in a home that has no kids!!! I am not getting on you brother, you know that, I am just saying that the majority of people would say kill the dog just like you because it bit a kid, and they say that without any knowledge whatsoever of the circumstances surrounding the event. Just like most people here that are saying put the dog down. Are we really in a position to arbitrarily kill anything we want simple because we don't understand what happened. That is not the type of person I want to be that's for sure. I would be willing to be a lot of money that the kid did something to provoke that dog. I remember a "Dog Whisperer" episode recently where the parents of a three year old boy couldn't understand why the dog growled and barked at the kid all the time. It was a little maltese mix and the dog eventually bit the kid. Cesar Millan decided to put a couple of hidden cameras in the house to see what was going on and sure enough there was the little boy kicking the hell out of the dog in the backyard when nobody was watching. What a surprise right? Dogs don't just wake up from a nap and decide to eat the baby then have a snack.


My point is this, we as humans like to think that we own the earth and that we get to be lord high executioner of all things that don't do it exactly the way we want things done. Maybe, just maybe, we should pay a little more attention to who we bite, growl at, and attack.



Hope this helps,
FDC

If a dog kills a kid, the dog must be put to sleep. It doesn't matter if the kid was provoking it. The worst kid's life is more important than that of the best dog. I hope that is how we will always view the situation as a society. Might not seem fair all the time, but I don't think the rankings should be muddled.

Of course it's the parent's responsibility to teach kids not to provoke animals. But even if the parents screw up, the kid provokes a deadly animal, all the humans do everything wrong - the dog still needs to put to sleep if it ever kills a kid.
 

SixFive

bonswa
Forum Member
Mar 12, 2001
18,942
359
83
54
BG, KY, USA
If a dog kills a kid, the dog must be put to sleep. It doesn't matter if the kid was provoking it. The worst kid's life is more important than that of the best dog. I hope that is how we will always view the situation as a society. Might not seem fair all the time, but I don't think the rankings should be muddled.

Of course it's the parent's responsibility to teach kids not to provoke animals. But even if the parents screw up, the kid provokes a deadly animal, all the humans do everything wrong - the dog still needs to put to sleep if it ever kills a kid.

Wow, and I thought I was the only one here who valued a human's life over a dog! Gould have agent, Kickserv, and FDC vehemently disagreeing with you on that point.

Green card post, Smurphy!
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,763
309
83
61
Fort Worth TX usa
Wow, and I thought I was the only one here who valued a human's life over a dog! Gould have agent, Kickserv, and FDC vehemently disagreeing with you on that point.

Green card post, Smurphy!

Life is singular in its meaning. Of course you value human life above others, you're human. I would be willing to bet the dog feels differently. The difference in canines and humans is the human propensity to kill without guilt or reason.
 

smurphy

cartographer
Forum Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,914
140
63
17
L.A.
The difference in canines and humans is the human propensity to kill without guilt or reason.

I can think of many other differences. Dogs are terrible handicappers for one - worse than the average madjacker even. Remember Mr. Mel? Worst NFL capper I've ever seen.
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,763
309
83
61
Fort Worth TX usa
I can think of many other differences. Dogs are terrible handicappers for one - worse than the average madjacker even. Remember Mr. Mel? Worst NFL capper I've ever seen.

This is true, but I will say one thing for Mr. Mel. He was certainly the second fluffiest capper, behind Nole of course.
 

The Joker

Registered
Forum Member
Aug 3, 2008
28,116
360
83
48
Tennessee
www.madjacksports.com
Bet on MyBookie
Top