I would love to read some of your publications. Point me to them. I am sure it is some ground breaking stuff.
a quick poll--need some input
- Thread starter pt1gard
- Start date
I would love to read some of your publications. Point me to them. I am sure it is some ground breaking stuff.
Improbable Collapse (2006)
"Improbable Collapse is the first film to thoroughly review the evidence for WTC demolitions from a scientific perspective. We invite you to browse our site to get a sense of the subjects our film covers, the extras on the DVD, and to learn more about a few of the many people who appear in the film."
http://www.911docs.net/improbable_collapse.php
okay, my 2 cents, we and mostly I, got off track arguing with the official story believers ... they have been asked repeatedly to answer simple, direct questions and they run every time, yet they have asked us to answer innane questions that we have posted here many times and they are too lazy to research on their own ... they have clamored for debate and cried to mods to close this thread, trying to draw us into name calling, which i finally succumbed to for a bit ... that said, I am going back to completely ignoring them bc they dont want a debate, bc like i have proven they refuse to do their part in answering anything ...
I would advise all the truth seekers to ignore them, block them, etc, bc it turns to chaos and its evident their only recourse is to clutter this thread with nonsense and paste unrelated pics and topics and/or ignore every single question we ever ask in a transparent attempt to make us waste our time and keep from posting the truth about our government ...
hope everyone had a great xmas
all my best,
gregg:00hour
"Improbable Collapse is the first film to thoroughly review the evidence for WTC demolitions from a scientific perspective. We invite you to browse our site to get a sense of the subjects our film covers, the extras on the DVD, and to learn more about a few of the many people who appear in the film."
http://www.911docs.net/improbable_collapse.php
okay, my 2 cents, we and mostly I, got off track arguing with the official story believers ... they have been asked repeatedly to answer simple, direct questions and they run every time, yet they have asked us to answer innane questions that we have posted here many times and they are too lazy to research on their own ... they have clamored for debate and cried to mods to close this thread, trying to draw us into name calling, which i finally succumbed to for a bit ... that said, I am going back to completely ignoring them bc they dont want a debate, bc like i have proven they refuse to do their part in answering anything ...
I would advise all the truth seekers to ignore them, block them, etc, bc it turns to chaos and its evident their only recourse is to clutter this thread with nonsense and paste unrelated pics and topics and/or ignore every single question we ever ask in a transparent attempt to make us waste our time and keep from posting the truth about our government ...
hope everyone had a great xmas
all my best,
gregg:00hour
Last edited:
I'd send you a link to a paper I researched and wrote about trace elements and how they deteriorate over time that actually really was published in a real life science journal.
But then you would get my full name, and with your unstable mind... well... that just isn't very responsible of me.
It would be like handing a drunk guy the keys to my car.
:mj07: :mj07: :mj07:
Gomer, I really hate to be nasty during the holiday season, but you are an idiot.
Gomer, I really hate to be nasty during the holiday season, but you are an idiot.
Last edited:
Don't worry, I realize it's not just the holidy season that you are nasty.
It's not like a leopard can change its spots.
stick figure dick in your ear cockmunch is taking the high road now? I am done with you gomer, you are a waste of time, and carbon, and oxygen for that matter.
awesomeness... you are too stupid to even realize when you have been just called all around nasty 365 days a year.
and you tell me i am taking the high road.
pure bliss.
:142smilie :142smilie
or wait... i bet your hero pt1 emailed you and told you to stop with me.
bark, little moonbat!.... bark!
good moonbat!
:142smilie ...i`m kidding,wocky...
chill out my brother....i just read that theres a new study that shows tantrums may lead to mental illness......
and we won`t have that!....
happy new year...:mj06:
the phantom hijackers that never bought tickets and never got on jets
the phantom hijackers that never bought tickets and never got on jets
QUESTION: About the hijackers, were they ticketed passengers? If not, do you know how they got on the planes?
FBI DIRECTOR ROBERT MUELLER: Yes, they were ticketed passengers.
ASHCROFT: [T]o our best estimate and our best knowledge given the information at this time, on the four planes that crashed was at least 18. Unless contradicted by evidence, which we wouldn't anticipate, two planes had five hijackers and two other planes had four hijackers each. [...] American Airlines 77, Dulles to Los Angeles [had] four hijackers.
On Sepember 14 it was revealed by the FBI that there was another hijacker on Flight 77 - Hani Hanjour. [CNN, 9/14/01]
A few days later, it was reported that Hanjour's name was not on the passenger manifest of Flight 77 because he may not have had a ticket. [Washington Post, 9/16/01 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/graphics/attack/hijackers.html]
How was Hanjour able to board the plane if he didn't have his name on the manifest or a ticket?
If Hanjour's name wasn't on the manifest and he didn't have a ticket there can be no record whatsoever of Hanjour boarding Flight 77, so how did the FBI know he was on the plane?
Was Hanjour's name added to the hijackers when it was realised that none of the original list of Flight 77 hijackers were pilots?
There were no Arabs on Flight 77
http://theunjustmedia.com/9-11/American airline flight 77 passengers.htm
the phantom hijackers that never bought tickets and never got on jets
QUESTION: About the hijackers, were they ticketed passengers? If not, do you know how they got on the planes?
FBI DIRECTOR ROBERT MUELLER: Yes, they were ticketed passengers.
ASHCROFT: [T]o our best estimate and our best knowledge given the information at this time, on the four planes that crashed was at least 18. Unless contradicted by evidence, which we wouldn't anticipate, two planes had five hijackers and two other planes had four hijackers each. [...] American Airlines 77, Dulles to Los Angeles [had] four hijackers.
On Sepember 14 it was revealed by the FBI that there was another hijacker on Flight 77 - Hani Hanjour. [CNN, 9/14/01]
A few days later, it was reported that Hanjour's name was not on the passenger manifest of Flight 77 because he may not have had a ticket. [Washington Post, 9/16/01 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/graphics/attack/hijackers.html]
How was Hanjour able to board the plane if he didn't have his name on the manifest or a ticket?
If Hanjour's name wasn't on the manifest and he didn't have a ticket there can be no record whatsoever of Hanjour boarding Flight 77, so how did the FBI know he was on the plane?
Was Hanjour's name added to the hijackers when it was realised that none of the original list of Flight 77 hijackers were pilots?
There were no Arabs on Flight 77
http://theunjustmedia.com/9-11/American airline flight 77 passengers.htm
.............................................................
judge
we have asked him this many times
this is how he responds.
........................................................
unrelated pictures.....wtf
:shrug: :SIB
judge i dont assume to know exactly what happened that day, but i dont believe any hijackers ever stepped on those planes and the dupes were piloted by remote ...
as far as where the people went, the gov. had no trouble watching thousands die at pearl harbor or the wtcs, or in Iraq (a million now), the handful of people on those planes means nothing to the neocons ... again the SSDI shows gaping discrepencies to the list of flight deaths that day analogous to their 82% typically found on their index ...
i do know that almost all what the gov. and kean report concluded is lies bc even the heads of the kean commission said as much ...
now do you believe that satam's passport fluttered down and was picked up and handed to a cop a few blocks from the wtcs?
what are your feelings on the Babs olson phone calls that the fbi has admitted never happened but were a huge part of the official story?
do you believe planes can evoporate like the gov. insisted happened 2xs that day?
please answer my 3 questions as I showed you the same respect ... i have gone on record as saying none of the crash sites IMO were hit by 11, 77, 93 or 175 ...
now what do you believe as far as what I asked you? please dont be yet another one who wont answer direct questions ... see the truth doesnt have to hide, if we dont know something we admit it ... but im curious if you have any comment of the official story, so please share what you think in regards to my questions.
thank you
gregg
as far as where the people went, the gov. had no trouble watching thousands die at pearl harbor or the wtcs, or in Iraq (a million now), the handful of people on those planes means nothing to the neocons ... again the SSDI shows gaping discrepencies to the list of flight deaths that day analogous to their 82% typically found on their index ...
i do know that almost all what the gov. and kean report concluded is lies bc even the heads of the kean commission said as much ...
now do you believe that satam's passport fluttered down and was picked up and handed to a cop a few blocks from the wtcs?
what are your feelings on the Babs olson phone calls that the fbi has admitted never happened but were a huge part of the official story?
do you believe planes can evoporate like the gov. insisted happened 2xs that day?
please answer my 3 questions as I showed you the same respect ... i have gone on record as saying none of the crash sites IMO were hit by 11, 77, 93 or 175 ...
now what do you believe as far as what I asked you? please dont be yet another one who wont answer direct questions ... see the truth doesnt have to hide, if we dont know something we admit it ... but im curious if you have any comment of the official story, so please share what you think in regards to my questions.
thank you
gregg
The last moments of Flight 11
The last moments of Flight 11
A flight attendant's desperate telephone call has provided new details of the last moments of Flight 11 before it hit the World Trade Center.
According to the FBI transcript, part of which was published in the Los Angeles Times, Madeline Amy Sweeney described how hijackers stabbed passengers and then diverted the plane.
Flight attendant Madeline Amy Sweeney
A US official praised Ms Sweeney's ability to keep calm and describe the crisis as it unfolded but the mother-of-two's words ended in horror and disbelief.
When Ms Sweeney came on the phone to ground staff in Boston it was to report that a hijack was in progress.
Four attackers had cut the throat of a passenger in business class and stabbed two others, she said.
Three of the hijackers had been sitting in business class themselves and one spoke very good English.
Composure
As Ms Sweeney was giving their seat numbers, they reached the cockpit and it was then, as the plane suddenly changed course, that she spoke her last reported words:
"I see water and buildings. Oh my God! Oh my God!" [She was a long time flight attendant. One would think she'd recognize Manhattan if she was so detailed oriented as this article contends?]
The suspected hijackers on Flight 11
Waleed M Alshehri
Wail Alshehri
Mohamed Atta
Abdelaziz al-Omari
Satam Al Suqami
Officials at American Airlines have been asked not to discuss the telephone call with the press, but one unnamed member of staff praised the dead flight attendant.
"She was very, very composed, very detailed," he said.
"It was impressive that she could do that."
Ms Sweeney's account of the hijacking provides unique evidence of what took place but it also appears to conflict with previous information.
The FBI has named five hijackers on board Flight 11, whereas Ms Sweeney spotted only four.
Also, the seat numbers she gave were different from those registered in the hijackers' names.
The last moments of Flight 11
A flight attendant's desperate telephone call has provided new details of the last moments of Flight 11 before it hit the World Trade Center.
According to the FBI transcript, part of which was published in the Los Angeles Times, Madeline Amy Sweeney described how hijackers stabbed passengers and then diverted the plane.
Flight attendant Madeline Amy Sweeney
A US official praised Ms Sweeney's ability to keep calm and describe the crisis as it unfolded but the mother-of-two's words ended in horror and disbelief.
When Ms Sweeney came on the phone to ground staff in Boston it was to report that a hijack was in progress.
Four attackers had cut the throat of a passenger in business class and stabbed two others, she said.
Three of the hijackers had been sitting in business class themselves and one spoke very good English.
Composure
As Ms Sweeney was giving their seat numbers, they reached the cockpit and it was then, as the plane suddenly changed course, that she spoke her last reported words:
"I see water and buildings. Oh my God! Oh my God!" [She was a long time flight attendant. One would think she'd recognize Manhattan if she was so detailed oriented as this article contends?]
The suspected hijackers on Flight 11
Waleed M Alshehri
Wail Alshehri
Mohamed Atta
Abdelaziz al-Omari
Satam Al Suqami
Officials at American Airlines have been asked not to discuss the telephone call with the press, but one unnamed member of staff praised the dead flight attendant.
"She was very, very composed, very detailed," he said.
"It was impressive that she could do that."
Ms Sweeney's account of the hijacking provides unique evidence of what took place but it also appears to conflict with previous information.
The FBI has named five hijackers on board Flight 11, whereas Ms Sweeney spotted only four.
Also, the seat numbers she gave were different from those registered in the hijackers' names.
Last edited:
........................................................
this is the heart of the conspiracy theory they hold so dear to their hearts.
The planes were not tracked by radar. There were no hijackers on the planes, the ID fluttered into the FBI hands , etc etc.
Its ludicrous to even contemplate that this could be pulled off. Thats why no media will even touch it. Its patently ridiculous.
.......................................................
Lets see here. So the flight attnedant has witnessed the cutting of the throat of a business class passenger.
Can you not see that after the hijacking had begun that the hijackers would move everyone back from their seats and sit wherever they felt they could take over the plane best from.
She was reporting what she saw at that moment, not what the fawking seating plan said.
Its so simple a explanation, and you make it out to be some big conspiracy impossibliity.
Last edited:
............................................................
wtf do you expect her to say or do.
the woman knew she was about to die.
for christs sakes.
