Announcement from Ferguson Missouri

[fatdaddycool]

Purple,
I assure you he will be indicted on federal charges. You may want to read the statement published by the president of the bar association. It's going to happen.

Yyz,
My mom is waiting on me to go shopping and i don't have the time right now to give your post the well thought out response it deserves so I'll get back to you sir.

Cherry,
Always my friend.

 

[Skulnik]

Eric Holder the RACIST Attorney General?

Maybe Wilson should sue Holder?

JMO

 

[bleedingpurple]

Purple,
I assure you he will be indicted on federal charges. You may want to read the statement published by the president of the bar association. It's going to happen.

Yyz,
My mom is waiting on me to go shopping and i don't have the time right now to give your post the well thought out response it deserves so I'll get back to you sir.

Cherry,
Always my friend.

Not a chance he gets convicted.

 

[THE KOD]

in a way every cop in America was on trial


and they do stick together


and cover asses.

 

[lowell]

in a way every cop in America was on trial


and they do stick together


and cover asses.

1501 . Averages out to one dead every 58 hours . That is the number( according to NLEOMf report )that have been killed in past ten years. I have three suggestions to the far left pundits who post their displeasure at the Ferguson decision.
1. Take the time to read stories about some of these policemen who were killed. Most of them were doing their jobs enforcing the law.
2. If you are dissatisfied with the police in Ferguson go and tutor some minorities so they can pass the test and become officers.
3. If you do not approve of Mculloch the prosecutor then vote him out of office .It won't be the first Democrat who was given the boot.
"Pants up...Don't loot"

 

[fatdaddycool]

He wasn't shot for committing a robbery, yet you keep saying that.


It's also ridiculous to say there are no sides. Every single story on this incident has included, "white cop shoots unarmed black boy". Why are the colors important? Because THAT'S what makes news in this country.

If Wilson had shot Mike Oblonski, 10 people wouldn't have given a fuck! In all honesty, I think you know that, too.

I agree with that. Had it been white on white crime it wouldn't have been nearly as publicized. I stated in an earlier post that media is weighted to white America. This is exactly what I have maintained in other threads concerning pit bulls suffering a similar bias.
There are certainly sides being taken and lines being drawn between black and white. Personally, I believe color is involved because that's how the majority see it.

If I'm repeating myself about the robbery it's because that what Wilson testified too. It was after they exchanged alleged curses that Wilson said he saw the cigarillos, red hat, and yellow socks that it occurred to him that he fit the description of a robbery suspect. It is then that he radios for assistance, then backs up, cutting off the two men. I understand that Wilson maintains he was in fear for his life and that's why he shot him, however, there are several inconsistencies in his testimony. I'd like to see him cross examined.

 

[Nole]

I'd like to see him cross examined.

I'd like to see this thread disappear! Always at the top of the forum.

Can't believe you guys are actually taking time out of your life to address this BS.

A fucking thug is dead. Let's move on.




30 secs of my life wasted posting to this thread.

:facepalm:

 

[yyz]

You see the story on the gal who lost an eye in the riots?


Now SHE wants "justice", too!



So.....now what? Do they scribble another check, or say, "though shit"? Give in to the thugs, or play mean old whitey keepin' us down?

 

[Morris]

You see the story on the gal who lost an eye in the riots?


Now SHE wants "justice", too!



So.....now what? Do they scribble another check, or say, "though shit"? Give in to the thugs, or play mean old whitey keepin' us down?

Not only that but they want Federal assistance for the damage and looting that was done during the riots. Town officials said the gov should have stepped in and prevented it. WTF is next????

...

 

[bleedingpurple]

Purple,
I assure you he will be indicted on federal charges. You may want to read the statement published by the president of the bar association. It's going to happen.

Everything I am reading is stating that it is unlikely the Feds will indict Wilson and this is probably it. The Feds only indict if the evidence is strong. Furthermore they say if Wilson is indicted the likelihood of him getting convicted is very small. Now he may get civil damages.

 

[fatdaddycool]

I'd like to see this thread disappear! Always at the top of the forum.

Can't believe you guys are actually taking time out of your life to address this BS.

A fucking thug is dead. Let's move on.




30 secs of my life wasted posting to this thread.

:facepalm:

Unfortunately, the majority thinks along the same lines as you. They'd prefer to not hear about this and put it out of their minds. It occurs to me that this apathetic attitude towards this social issue is exactly why it keeps happening. This also applies to school shootings among other manufactured panic states.
I'm sorry you don't like the thread, but I do, and this issue is important to some.

 

[HankWilliamsJr]

A fucking thug is dead. Let's move on.

amen


:0074

 

[HankWilliamsJr]

looks like hank and nole have some things in common...another great friend I've made at madjacks!

:0074

 

[fatdaddycool]

Everything I am reading is stating that it is unlikely the Feds will indict Wilson and this is probably it. The Feds only indict if the evidence is strong. Furthermore they say if Wilson is indicted the likelihood of him getting convicted is very small. Now he may get civil damages.

Keep reading. You have not heard or seen all the evidence, nor have I. If you read the testimony of all there is plenty of evidence to convict Wilson. Maybe it's not a murder conviction, maybe it's a lesser charge. His story doesn't add up. There is not one witness that completely corroborates his account. All have inconsistencies contrary to his account.
For instance, several witnesses, seven to be exact, testified that Wilson backed up the vehicle and opened the door into Brown who shoved the door back into Wilson. The testified that Brown punched him through the window, Wilson pushed through the door and grabbed brown in a headlock type mice and the two began to scuffle again in the vehicle. Wilson testified that Brown tried to grab his weapon while holstered and dug it into his hip and that he felt Brown's finger try to pull the trigger and shoot him in the leg. Wilson went on to testify that he then warned brown he would shoot him and proceeded to fire two rounds one hitting brown in the thumb.
In the coroner's report the wound is not consistent inv any way work Wilson's claim that he tried to get his finger on the trigger but consistent with four witnesses that oppose Wilson's account saying that Wilson unholstered his weapon pointed it at brown and said he would shoot him. Brown replied and tried to push the gun away grabbing the barrel from the front and Wilson shot him. There are at lady five accounts of brown surrendering. Eleven accounts of him trying to flee and being fired upon. At least five accounts saying brown stumbled and was falling to the ground when shot in the top of the head.
If you think Wilson is being truthful then that's fine, but that means everyone and I mean every single witness lied about something but him

 

[bleedingpurple]

Keep reading. You have not heard or seen all the evidence, nor have I. If you read the testimony of all there is plenty of evidence to convict Wilson. Maybe it's not a murder conviction, maybe it's a lesser charge. His story doesn't add up. There is not one witness that completely corroborates his account. All have inconsistencies contrary to his account. For instance, several witnesses, seven to be exact, testified that Wilson backed up the vehicle and opened the door into Brown who shoved the door back into Wilson. The testified that Brown punched him through the window, Wilson pushed through the door and grabbed brown in a headlock type mice and the two began to scuffle again in the vehicle. Wilson testified that Brown tried to grab his weapon while holstered and dug it into his hip and that he felt Brown's finger try to pull the trigger and shoot him in the leg. Wilson went on to testify that he then warned brown he would shoot him and proceeded to fire two rounds one hitting brown in the thumb. In the coroner's report the wound is not consistent inv any way work Wilson's claim that he tried to get his finger on the trigger but consistent with four witnesses that oppose Wilson's account saying that Wilson unholstered his weapon pointed it at brown and said he would shoot him. Brown replied and tried to push the gun away grabbing the barrel from the front and Wilson shot him. There are at lady five accounts of brown surrendering. Eleven accounts of him trying to flee and being fired upon. At least five accounts saying brown stumbled and was falling to the ground when shot in the top of the head. If you think Wilson is being truthful then that's fine, but that means everyone and I mean every single witness lied about something but him

1. I don't think he's being totally truthful.
2. What I am reading is opinions from experts regarding the chances of him being indicted.
3. I think you gave a good reasoning of why he won't be indicted, too many different inconsistencies in testimony. Nobody's stories are straight and the cop gets the benefit of the doubt.

 

[ChrryBlstr]

Lawyer Lisa Bloom raises some concerns....

Lawyer Lisa Bloom raises some concerns....

Lisa Bloom @LisaBloom ? Nov 27

Astoundingly, prosecutors never asked Darren Wilson if he shot Mike Brown when his hands were up.


"What do I do not to get beaten inside my car," Darren Wilson said he thought. Yet prosecutors never asked why he didn't hit the gas.

Prosecutors never asked Darren Wilson how Mike Brown "grabbed" his gun without leaving a single fingerprint.

Prosecutors never asked Wilson to demonstrate with a mannequin how Brown hit his right cheek w right hand while standing on his left.

Prosecutors never asked Wilson to demonstrate how Brown grabbed his gun with Brown's right hand and twisted it (backhand?) into his pelvis

When a witness gestures in a legal proceeding, SOP is for lawyers to describe that in words so record is clear. Not done in Wilson GJ.

If Mike Brown twisted Wilson's gun-holding hand backwards into Wilson's pelvis, why doesn't Wilson have a wrist injury or even redness?

Like George Zimmerman, Darren Wilson has yet to face any tough questions for killing an unarmed kid. Can't we agree that's a minimum reqt?

Wilson at station right after shooting says he told cops he'd been punched in the face. Their response: "where?" Bc they cdn't see anything

"You said you felt threatened in that area bc there is violence & guns & everything" pros says to Wilson in GJ. Actually he didn't say that

"Ofc Wilson, I'm not trying to get in your head" pros says to Wilson apologetically. Actually figuring out motive and intent is whole point

Just read all of Wilson's grand jury testimony a second time. Reads like a defense attorney asking easy, friendly Qs of her own client

Darren Wilson says he had scratches on his neck, but never once says Mike Brown caused them. & naturally prosecutors don't bother to ask

Today I?m reading (Mike?s friend) Dorian Johnson?s GJ testimony. He?s peppered w tough Qs, so different from soft treatment of Darren Wilson

***The logical flaw in much pro-WIlson argument is assuming all he says is 100% true. Point of the process is to test whether that's the case

Peace!

 

[fatdaddycool]

The more I read about in his testimony, the more obvious it becomes that he's lying. I believe he is guilty of perjury and murder. Wilson is no hero and certainly not deserving of a public service job.

 

[lowell]

The left is so enraged with the decision by the grand jury.
Just read the article in The Daily Beast about the decision.
Funny how they conveniently left out the fact that McCulloch is a Democrat.
Kind of hard to blame this on a right wing conspiracy when the decision maker is a Dem.
Get over it. Do not recall the left being so upset with the OJ verdict The American judicial system made the decision.
Wilson was doing his job.
"Pants up..Don't loot."

 

[Jaxx]

Keep reading. You have not heard or seen all the evidence, nor have I. If you read the testimony of all there is plenty of evidence to convict Wilson. Maybe it's not a murder conviction, maybe it's a lesser charge. His story doesn't add up. There is not one witness that completely corroborates his account. All have inconsistencies contrary to his account.
For instance, several witnesses, seven to be exact, testified that Wilson backed up the vehicle and opened the door into Brown who shoved the door back into Wilson. The testified that Brown punched him through the window, Wilson pushed through the door and grabbed brown in a headlock type mice and the two began to scuffle again in the vehicle. Wilson testified that Brown tried to grab his weapon while holstered and dug it into his hip and that he felt Brown's finger try to pull the trigger and shoot him in the leg. Wilson went on to testify that he then warned brown he would shoot him and proceeded to fire two rounds one hitting brown in the thumb.
In the coroner's report the wound is not consistent inv any way work Wilson's claim that he tried to get his finger on the trigger but consistent with four witnesses that oppose Wilson's account saying that Wilson unholstered his weapon pointed it at brown and said he would shoot him. Brown replied and tried to push the gun away grabbing the barrel from the front and Wilson shot him. There are at lady five accounts of brown surrendering. Eleven accounts of him trying to flee and being fired upon. At least five accounts saying brown stumbled and was falling to the ground when shot in the top of the head.
If you think Wilson is being truthful then that's fine, but that means everyone and I mean every single witness lied about something but him

Give up man. He tried to grab the cops gun. If he had got control of it what then. Your banter and useless innuendo is endless. YOU DO NOT GRAB A COPS GUN OR YOU GET SHOT.

Unreal

:facepalm:

 

[yyz]

The more I read about in his testimony, the more obvious it becomes that he's lying. I believe he is guilty of perjury and murder. Wilson is no hero and certainly not deserving of a public service job.

I don't think he's a hero by a long shot. I think he's an average guy who was caught up in a situation that scared the shit out of him. Being scared so badly caused him to lose focus and shoot that guy. Sadly, he can't say, "I was scared", and he has to say, "I feared for my life".