Purple and Jaxx, If he, Brown, grabbed the gun as Wilson testified to and turned it into his pelvis in an attempt to shoot him in the leg, and Wilson "felt Brown's fingers at the finger guard" attempting to access and pull the trigger why is the not even a partial print from Brown anywhere on the weapon, holster, or belt? Not even a smidgen of one? Also, by Wilson's own testimony, why is it that if "the hulk that he felt like a baby in his hands" when he got his wrist twisted all the way back around, is there no damage or marks on his hands and wrist? Why are there several scratches on the back of Brown's neck consistent with the size of Wilson's hand if he supposedly never got hold of him? Why and how did Brown punch him on the right side of his face with a right handed closed fist while standing on Wilson's left side? Most importantly, people you stated that there are witness statements backing up Wilson's testimony. Please show me or name a single witness other than himself whose testimony corroborates Wilson's completely. There isn't one. Every single witness testified to something contrary to Wilson's account. Every single one. Not one said things happened just the way Wilson said they did. Now, you are allowing for a certain amount movement on the shooting fire Wilson because he's a cop and has a tough job. I'm fine with that, they do have a tough job and are much more likely to be involved in a shooting than the common man. However, providing that leeway to a cop also means that they should be held to a higher standard when it comes to matter of law such as honest testimony. His account should be without flaw or supposition and should stand up to even the toughest cross. His is not even close to that. Like blaster stated, why did Johnson, the witness testifying on Brown's behalf get crossed like the inquisition and Wilson got kid gloves
