archery

[dawgball]

For the love of God again.

For the love of whom?????

:0corn

 

[Terryray]

whom?????

:0corn

Administrator, I believe, does appreciate poster who knows the difference between nominative and objective interrogative pronouns.

 

[MadJack]

Administrator, I believe, does appreciate poster who knows the difference between nominative and objective interrogative pronouns.

i almost questioned him about that rule.

what is the rule for who/whom?

me and dawg also had a discussion about affect and effect one time too :mj07:

what drug you taking, tr, i might want some. :shrug:

 

[MadJack]

the word 'whom' is also on my pet peeve list, btw.

:SIB

 

[Terryray]

the word 'whom' is also on my pet peeve list, btw.

:SIB

yes, I do recall!

not sure all the proper rules, but "Whom" is the proper use in the objective case....Languages evolve, and fewer using proper form anymore--so new proper usage, one can argue, is that there no longer is a "proper usage" of who/whom.

we can all hop to that

 

[dawgball]

:142smilie

I edited to add the "m"!


:142smilie