Best fade i have ever seen in the NFL

[hammer1]

No 380

sf 307

ari 284

chi 266

bal 253

sd 232

tb 230

atl 226

nyg 222

gb 209

car 199

stl 179

cin 178

det 174

hilton top 5 ytd record

11-33-1

 

[bleedingpurple]

Anybody you really eyeing up. I'm really liking Cincy. I am showing 92% on the Dallas/Saints OVER .. No way I am taking that

Thanks for the info

 

[hammer1]

Hilton

Hilton

Been fading the top 5


will do so again buy a 1/2 here n there

 

[cavy1]

top 5 meaning these?

No 380

sf 307

ari 284

chi 266

bal 253

 

[PJ12]

top 5 meaning these?

No 380

sf 307

ari 284

chi 266

bal 253

yep Cards and Balty only weiners there, maybe just Balty :142smilie

 

[hammer1]

LOOOOO0000000000000000000zer again fadin' is LIFE !!!!!!!!!!

LOOOOO0000000000000000000zer again fadin' is LIFE !!!!!!!!!!

No 380

sf 307 Loooooozer

ari 284 - 4 LOOOOZER

chi 266 Pk Looooozer

bal 253 Win cd a been a loser

Top 5 1 - 3 so far I rest my case

 

[WildBillPicks7]

No 380

sf 307

ari 284

chi 266

bal 253

sd 232

tb 230

atl 226

nyg 222

gb 209

car 199

stl 179

cin 178

det 174

hilton top 5 ytd record

11-33-1

In a Horshack voice from "Welcome back Kotter" "ewwwwwww, ewwwwwww, ewwwwww?"

If those are the top 5 Hilton YTD record and they are 11-33, what are the bottom whatever number it is' record?

:shrug:

 

[hammer1]

In a Horshack voice from "Welcome back Kotter" "ewwwwwww, ewwwwwww, ewwwwww?"

If those are the top 5 Hilton YTD record and they are 11-33, what are the bottom whatever number it is' record?

:shrug:

Don't know but some dillligent person may wanna tab em...however......... can they be worse than 75 % losers ??? Best NFL Service around..Bar None !! an da price is right........FREE !!!!!!

 

[Earl714]

I have been following this since week 5, a double play if the bet is also in the bottom 5 excluding thursday night game.

It has been doing well, but a couple of weeks ago I checked the last 3 years, and actually the top 5 had been winners those years

 

[IX_Bender]

I have been following this since week 5, a double play if the bet is also in the bottom 5 excluding thursday night game.

It has been doing well, but a couple of weeks ago I checked the last 3 years, and actually the top 5 had been winners those years

If there ever was a surefire way, year to year, of winning and printing money. Then it wouldn't exist.

 

[Scrapman]

ok the hiton or rather las vegas hotel had Ariz - 4 but not the live lines that moved they were arizona - 2 1/2 then - 2 today


I know i bet them

 

[smurphy]

ok the hiton or rather las vegas hotel had Ariz - 4 but not the live lines that moved they were arizona - 2 1/2 then - 2 today


I know i bet them

Yes - the Hilton contestants had AZ at -2' and also Chi at +2', so those two actually won for them. The books might have gotten bit pretty good with these 2-way winners!

 

[Scrapman]

Yes - the Hilton contestants had AZ at -2' and also Chi at +2', so those two actually won for them. The books might have gotten bit pretty good with these 2-way winners!

YES itvwas Bears + 2 1/2 then when word came out cutler is back boomn lions + 1 happened Sharps possibly middled Vegas on that one a 3 1/2 point swing. Imagine winning both sides for $5000 each way not even buying points or tesing just taking advantage of line moves

 

[hammer1]

If there ever was a surefire way, year to year, of winning and printing money. Then it wouldn't exist.

Total Bullshit !!!!! U have been here longer than i have so you shd know my history here. Time after time i have posted " Fading " results but here and in the outside world nobody listens. But instead they want to argue about what is plain as day. If you didn't get the best line possible on Arizona _Plus 3 buy a half or +4 on Sunday on Texans and have a 3 2 fade the Hilton NFL weekend ur an idiot. Feel like rambling here and educating the masses but got a ton a things on my plate today..maybe later i will bless the forum with more "Wisdom" which no one will heed !!!!

 

[tball]

anti-hilton

anti-hilton

I had seen somewhere else where if you bet against top of card --on teams picked most, is hitting ridiculous clip -especially if one of those team's opponents for the week, are also one of the least teams chose

would love to keep track on - and actually see how produces.


regardless, thanks for sharing -t

 

[JMize]

Fwiw

The top 5 last year had a winning record...fading it this year has been profitable....but I would be careful....sure it will change

 

[smurphy]

Feel like rambling here and educating the masses but got a ton a things on my plate today..maybe later i will bless the forum with more "Wisdom" which no one will heed !!!!

Please, ramble away....

 

[MadJack]

Top 5 1 - 3 so far I rest my case

After the games were played. :facepalm:

 

[tball]

Fwiw

The top 5 last year had a winning record...fading it this year has been profitable....but I would be careful....sure it will change

are we talking about same thing?

I was under impression the teams he had there were the most selected team amongst all players (just general picks) not any particular group of players, like the top 5 players per se

maybe the wording confused me in thread -perhaps

 

[IX_Bender]

I was replying to the person who mentioned that the last few years, those picks have been profitable.

Certainly not the case this year.

My point is, that every year is different. Folks come up with systems, analytics, trends, etc. If any of those worked year in and year out, there wouldn't be anyone around to clean toilets.

This year, with the entrants to the LVH, it seems fading the top 5 consensus is money. 2 years ago, not so much. The fact is that things change. Just look at Cowherds last two seasons.

Just like certain weekends, fading the public plays is real profitable. Other weekends , like this past one. Joe Public cleaned up with Seattle and Denver. Then the Saints last night. Every weekend is different in that regard, and in regards to fading the LVH contest picks Top 5, seems to be the hot ticket this year.

GL