California Governor

kcwolf

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 1, 2000
7,224
21
0
Iowa City
what til Arnold's medical situation comes full circle.

The guy doesn't have a chance if the right people stand up about his misuse of drugs in his twenties..............oh, forget about that, that is trivial to what I know about him now.

Hint: A New Mexico pharmicist.:nono:
 

auspice

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 19, 2001
334
1
0
Ohio
to timbo

I agree. Arnold is too likeable and photographable to lose. He doesn't have to pay for publicity. All he has to do is make himself available and he can have as much pub as he wants.

Actually hard not to like Arnold but I wonder what he'd look like without the 'Clairol for men' treatment? Bet he'd look 100 years old.
 

dr. freeze

BIG12 KING
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2001
7,170
8
0
Mansion
auspice said:
Stuman

By those 'serious' career politicians....are you referring to the likes of Ronald Regan (first political job = governor of California) that later tried to run the presidency by a weegie (sp?) board or G.W.Bush (first political job = governor of Texas) who isn't smart enough to know how to use a weegie board?

Yeah.....these "ticket full of clowns" (as you called it) should disappear but as long as there are gullible 'bottom feeder' (as Freeze would call it) voters......there will be 'clowns'.

duhhhhh

you really know how to keep things in context don't you
 

auspice

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 19, 2001
334
1
0
Ohio
to timbo

Nice to see your state's ebonics has worked out so well for you. And they wonder why your state's economy is doomed. hmmm

Really.....anybody like Freeze that comes to the forum and states as a matter of fact that a particular party is full of 'bottom feeders' needs a needle stuck up his tight ass. It's malicious, mean spirited and wrong. But such is the wisdom of the humanatarian know as Freeze.
 
Last edited:

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
73
Boston
Just a question here but wasn't most of this crap in California started because Enron screwed them?
 

timbo

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 10, 1999
294
0
0
Northridge, CA, USA
The handling of the Enron situation is an issue. However, don't let this lead you to believe that if the power crisis never occurred, everything would be OK.
 

auspice

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 19, 2001
334
1
0
Ohio
to StevieD

Answer a quick question for me: why has G.W.Bush been able to completely skate from the fact he used an Enron jet during his campaign? He's also appointed a couple of former Enron employees during his term. If a dem had done the same thing there wouldn't be enough bandwidth in America to service the stories it would generate. Am I missing something here? Honestly, I'm confused on this one.
 

auspice

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 19, 2001
334
1
0
Ohio
to Timbo

Used to live on Brookhurst street in Huntington Beach.....about a mile up from the beach. Do miss the area.
 

timbo

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 10, 1999
294
0
0
Northridge, CA, USA
Nice area! Sorry to see you had to leave it. Unfortunately, I am in the San Fernando Valley. I swear every year I am going to re-locate but never manage to do so.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Well the broken record has started. Every time they ask A.S. a good question he said about the same thing. Nothing. He spins it to the people need control. Thats what they will get with him. Same answer whan asked about all the Meican visitors, Health Care, The deficit, High cost of energy. The people will control. Chit sounds like you dont need a governor at all. People will run everthing. If everyone listens well they will see thru this BS.
 

dr. freeze

BIG12 KING
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2001
7,170
8
0
Mansion
auspice said:
to timbo

Nice to see your state's ebonics has worked out so well for you. And they wonder why your state's economy is doomed. hmmm

Really.....anybody like Freeze that comes to the forum and states as a matter of fact that a particular party is full of 'bottom feeders' needs a needle stuck up his tight ass. It's malicious, mean spirited and wrong. But such is the wisdom of the humanatarian know as Freeze.

lol go into the welfare line and see how many of the recipients vote democrat....

What is malicious, mean spirited, and wrong is the fact that a party will keep these people down by constantly giving them things and encouraging their mentality of being the victim whenever something doesn't go their way. It is RUTHLESS to keep these people poor by issuing them $$ and keeping them out of work by reinforcing their laziness. It is Inhumanitarian to take the American spirit out of them which rewards hard work. As a result, you have created a culture of crime, poverty, and illness. THAT is WRONG. And THAT is today's democratic party.
 

auspice

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 19, 2001
334
1
0
Ohio
freeze

Much as you despise Clinton, he did more good in modifying 'welfare' for working mothers and helping them create job skills for themselves to carry on with their lives better than any president in the past 40 years. Try to get your hands around the facts of the real world situations rather than just spewing your tired little anit-democratic slogans and hate phrases. Perhaps a good hate management class. Anything....please....get some help!!
 

dr. freeze

BIG12 KING
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2001
7,170
8
0
Mansion
lol what exactly did Clinton do? he trained them? lmao...maybe he provided more unproductive government jobs i guess....

and just exactly who do i hate???

just because the dem's keep people down and promote a culture of entitlement instead of hard work and i point that out to your blinded eyes i am a hater??? when in fact i would rather like to get these people back on their feet and be productive and working so they have a little more joy in their lives? that is hating?

thats all you people have these days -- name-calling and negativity

and unfortunately if you tell the people they are victims long enough they will start to believe it
 

auspice

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 19, 2001
334
1
0
Ohio
freeze

Clinton passed legislation which provided educational assistance for single mothers on welfare to help them create job skills. Guess little things like that just sort of passed you by while you were in that coma huh?
 

dr. freeze

BIG12 KING
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2001
7,170
8
0
Mansion
great job for Clinton. I bet he did it all himself. Give him the credit. This selfless act of his has done wonders for our country.

i do have to wonder though....is your accusation of hatred just a projection of your own feelings (just a simple defense mechanism) or are you a judgemental person by nature?
 

auspice

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 19, 2001
334
1
0
Ohio
freeze wrote "what exactly did Clinton do? he trained them? lmao.....maybe he provided them with more unproductive government jobs i guess"

Well since you're so curious freeze, just try to understand the fact that it's not the president's job to individually train EACH recipient. It's his job to provide legislation that will accomplish certain goals. One of these is obviously taking people off welfare and putting them to work. That's why the following legislation below was passed. It limits the 'stay' on welfare and helps the less fortunate obtains job skills.

It's just unbelievable that you're so ignorant of these huge changes. Just unreal.


___________________________________


On August 22, President Clinton signed into law "The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-193)," a comprehensive bipartisan welfare reform plan that will dramatically change the nation's welfare system into one that requires work in exchange for time-limited assistance. The law contains strong work requirements, a performance bonus to reward states for moving welfare recipients into jobs, state maintenance of effort requirements, comprehensive child support enforcement, and supports for families moving from welfare to work -- including increased funding for child care and guaranteed medical coverage.

Highlights of "The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996" follow.


Making Welfare a Transistion to Work
o Work requirements.

Under the new law, recipients must work after two years on assistance, with few exceptions. Twenty-five percent of all families in each state must be engaged in work activities or have left the rolls in fiscal year (FY) 1997, rising to 50 percent in FY 2002. Single parents must participate for at least 20 hours per week the first year, increasing to at least 30 hours per week by FY 2000. Two-parent families must work 35 hours per week by July 1, 1997.

o Supports for families transitioning into jobs.

The new welfare law provides $14 billion in child care funding over six years -- an increase of $3.5 billion over current law -- to help more mothers move into jobs. The new law also guarantees that women on welfare continue to receive health coverage for their families, including at least one year of transitional Medicaid when they leave welfare for work.

o Work Activities.

To count toward state work requirements, recipients will be required to participate in unsubsidized or subsidized employment, on-the-job training, work experience, community service, 12 months of vocational training, or provide child care services to individuals who are participating in community service. Up to 6 weeks of job search (no more than 4 consecutive weeks) would count toward the work requirement. However, no more than 20 percent of each state's caseload may count toward the work requirement solely by participating in vocational training or by being a teen parent in secondary school. Single parents with a child under 6 who cannot find child care cannot be penalized for failure to meet the work requirements. States can exempt from the work requirement single parents with children under age one and disregard these individuals in the calculation of participation rates for up to 12 months.

o A five-year time limit.

Families who have received assistance for five cumulative years (or less at state option) will be ineligible for cash aid under the new welfare law. States will be permitted to exempt up to 20 percent of their caseload from the time limit, and states will have the option to provide non-cash assistance and vouchers to families that reach the time limit using Social Services Block Grant or state funds.

o Personal employability plans.

Under the new plan, states are required to make an initial assessment of recipients' skills. States can also develop personal responsibility plans for recipients identifying the education, training, and job placement services needed to move into the workforce.

o State maintenance of effort requirements.

The new welfare law requires states to maintain their own spending on welfare at at least 80 percent of FY 1994 levels. States must also maintain spending at 100 percent of FY 1994 levels to access a $2 billion contingency fund designed to assist states affected by high population growth or economic downturn. In addition, states must maintain 100 percent of FY 1994 or FY 1995 spending on child care (whichever is greater) to access additional child care funds beyond their initial allotment.

o Job subsidies.

The law also allows states to create jobs by taking money now used for welfare checks and using it to create community service jobs or to provide income subsidies or hiring incentives for potential employers.

o Performance bonus to reward work.

$1 billion will be available between FYs 1999-2003 for performance bonuses to reward states for moving welfare recipients into jobs. The Secretary of HHS, in consultation with the National Governors' Association (NGA) and American Public Welfare Association (APWA), will develop criteria for measuring state performance.

o State flexibility.

Under the new law, states which receive approval for welfare reform waivers before July 1, 1997 have the option to operate their cash assistance program under some or all of these waivers. For states electing this option, some provisions of the new law which are inconsistent with the waivers would not take effect until the expiration of the applicable waivers in the geographical areas covered by the waivers.


Promoting Responsibility
Comprehensive child support enforcement.

The new law includes the child support enforcement measures President Clinton proposed in 1994 -- the most sweeping crackdown on non-paying parents in history. These measures could increase child support collections by $24 billion and reduce federal welfare costs by $4 billion over 10 years. Under the new law, each state must operate a child support enforcement program meeting federal requirements in order to be eligible for Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) block grants. Provisions include:

o National new hire reporting system.

The law establishes a Federal Case Registry and National Directory of New Hires to track delinquent parents across state lines. It also requires that employers report all new hires to state agencies for transmittal of new hire information to the National Directory of New Hires. This builds on President Clinton's June 1996 executive action to track delinquent parents across state lines. The law also expands and streamlines procedures for direct withholding of child support from wages.

o Streamlined paternity establishment.

The new law streamlines the legal process for paternity establishment, making it easier and faster to establish paternities. It also expands the voluntary in-hospital paternity establishment program, started by the Clinton Administration in 1993, and requires a state form for voluntary paternity acknowledgment. In addition, the law mandates that states publicize the availability and encourage the use of voluntary paternity establishment processes. Individuals who fail to cooperate with paternity establishment will have their monthly cash assistance reduced by at least 25 percent.

o Uniform interstate child support laws.

The new law provides for uniform rules, procedures, and forms for interstate cases.

o Computerized state-wide collections.

The new law requires states to establish central registries of child support orders and centralized collection and disbursement units. It also requires expedited state procedures for child support enforcement.

o Tough new penalties.

Under the new law, states can implement tough child support enforcement techniques. The new law will expand wage garnishment, allow states to seize assets, allows states to require community service in some cases, and enable states to revoke drivers and professional licenses for parents who owe delinquent child support.

o "Families First."

Under a new "Family First" policy, families no longer receiving assistance will have priority in the distribution of child support arrears. This new policy will bring families who have left welfare for work about $1 billion in support over the first six years.

o Access and visitation programs.

In an effort to increase noncustodial parents' involvement in their children's lives, the new law includes grants to help states establish programs that support and facilitate noncustodial parents' visitation with and access to their children.

Teen Parent Provisions

o Live at home and stay in school requirements.

Under the new law, unmarried minor parents will be required to live with a responsible adult or in an adult-supervised setting and participate in educational and training activities in order to receive assistance. States will be responsible for locating or assisting in locating adult-supervised settings for teens.

o Teen Pregnancy Prevention.

Starting in FY 1998, $50 million a year in mandatory funds would be added to the appropriations of the Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Block Grant for abstinence education. In addition, the Secretary of HHS will establish and implement a strategy to (1) prevent non-marital teen births, and (2) assure that at least 25 percent of communities have teen pregnancy prevention programs. No later than January 1, 1997, the Attorney General will establish a program that studies the linkage between statutory rape and teen pregnancy, and that educates law enforcement officials on the prevention and prosecution of statutory rape.




(continued)
 

auspice

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 19, 2001
334
1
0
Ohio
Improvements Over the Vetoed Bill
President Clinton vetoed the previous welfare reform bill (H.R. 4) submitted by Congress because it did too little to move people into jobs and failed to provide the supports -- like child care and health care -- that families need to move from welfare to work. "The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996" includes several improvements over the vetoed bill, including:

o Guaranteed medical coverage.

The new law preserves the national guarantee of health care for poor children, the disabled, pregnant women, the elderly, and people on welfare. H.R. 4 would have ended the guarantee of Medicaid coverage for cash assistance recipients.

o Increased child care funding and mandatory child care maintenance of effort.

The new law provides $14 billion in child care funding -- an increase of $3.5 billion over 6 years -- allowing more mothers to leave welfare for work. States will receive an initial allotment each year from a fund of approximately $1.2 billion. To access additional funds, states must maintain their own spending at 100 percent of their FY 1994 or 1995 spending on child care (whichever is higher). By contrast, H.R. 4 increased child care funding by just $300 million over current law, and did not require states to meet child care maintenance of effort requirements to access additional federal child care funding, allowing states to lower their own spending.

o Incentives for states to move people into jobs.

The new law includes a $1 billion performance bonus to reward states that meet performance targets. H.R. 4 did not contain a cash performance bonus.

o Preservation of nutrition programs.

H.R. 4 would have given states the option of block granting food stamp benefits. The bill would have also capped federal food stamp program expenditures, limiting maximum benefit increases to 2 percent per year, regardless of growth in need for assistance. The new law maintains the national nutritional safety net by eliminating the block grant option as well as the food stamp cap.

o Current law child protection and adoption.

Unlike H.R. 4, the new plan maintains current law on child protection and adoption, and does not reduce funds for child welfare, child abuse, foster care and adoption services.

o Improved contingency fund.

The new law includes a $2 billion contingency fund to protect states in times of population growth or economic downturn. H.R. 4 included a $1 billion contingency fund.

o Current law child care health and safety standards.

The new law protects children by maintaining health and safety standards for day care. H.R. 4 would have eliminated health and safety protections.

o Protection of disabled children. H.R. 4 would have cut SSI by 25 percent for many disabled children. The new law eliminates this proposed two-tier system.

o Optional family cap.

Under the new law, states have the option to implement a family cap. H.R. 4 required states to deny cash benefits to children born to welfare recipients unless the state legislature explicitly voted to provide benefits.

Necessary Improvements

President Clinton has stated that the new law requires several improvements. Specifically, he has pledged to fix two provisions of the welfare bill which he believes have nothing to do with welfare reform.

o Food Stamps.

According to President Clinton, the new law cuts deeper than it should in Food Stamps, mostly for working families who have high shelter costs.

o Legal Immigrants.

The law includes provisions that would deny most forms of public assistance to most legal immigrants for five years or until they attain citizenship. The President has said that legal immigrants who fall on hard times through no fault of their own and need help should get it, although their sponsors should take additional responsibility for them.

(continued)


Building on the President's Work To End Welfare as We Know It
Even before Congress passed welfare reform legislation acceptable to President Clinton, states were acting to try new approaches. With encouragement, support, and cooperation from the Clinton Administration, 43 states have moved forward with 78 welfare reform experiments. The Clinton Administration has also required teen mothers to stay in school, required federal employees to pay their child support, and cracked down on people who owe child support and cross state lines. As a result of these efforts and President Clinton's efforts to strengthen the economy, child support collections have increased by nearly 50% to $11.8 billion in FY 1996, and there are 1.9 million fewer people on welfare today than when President Clinton took office. "The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996" will build on these efforts by allowing states flexibility to reform their welfare systems and to build on demonstrations initiated under the Clinton Administration.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top