"The skeptic does not mean him who doubts, but him who investigates or researches, as opposed to him who asserts and thinks that he has found. " -Miguel De Unamuno
blgstocks said:It is true that SOME of Bushes Freinds have made lost of money, primarily the oil and defense industries. BUT other industries have been hit very hard like the tech sector, which among many other things has an indicator of a strong economy and losing billions in Iraq has hurt the Tech sector since we have gone to war.
But say he is not AS good of freinds with those people as his oil friends, Why not control the Saudi's oil! They have by far the richest and most extensive oil suplies in the world?!?! Or Iran which has even more than Iraq and known terrorists as well.
And if his primary goal is to control the oil then why not drill in Alaska or have another catastrophe happen so that we can drill there? Like Blow up the San Francisco Bridge(wtc), then say the Russians did it(Afghans), then go to war with the Alaskans(Iraq) because they have a climate and skin type that is similar to Russians(Afghans) and Americans wont know the difference.
And yes more money = more power but to kill thousands of your own innocent people seems insane to me. And if Bush did it for more money(hes already a multimillionaire) and more power (hes already the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES) then what is keeping everyone that would have to be involved in this coverup quiet?
I do appreciate your responses Hippo but, you didnt answer alot of my questions, u only answered one and that lead to alot of other questions that one would have to be skeptic of as well before one could jump in the bandwagon of saying our president is insane and wants to kill as many of us as long as he is still making a profit for him and his freinds by killing us.
blgstocks said:I didn't see that PBS special but they could have pulled it down due to the substained damage of falling debri. It might have been a hazard and damaged beyond repair. I really don't know why they didn't include #7 in the final report. To be fair I would say this administration has more of a policy of "its none of your business" than they do of "if you can't explain it don't talk about it", i don't think either is a very good policy though.
.
blgstocks said:But as for me I find it alot easier to swallow a building being left out of the commision report, than to swallow that there is a massive cover up mainly because of the questions that I would like answered if there is a coverup.
bjfinste said:Warren Commission files are sealed until 2039. Certainly long enough to make sure everyone involved is dead.
maverick2112 said:
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.