Cash Man's official Fade Brandon Lang thread....

[Cash Man]

50 DIMES New York Jets -6 -110 for Game ------>HUGE WINNAH
10 DIMES New Orleans Saints -6 -105 for Game ------.Winner
10 DIMES Dallas Cowboys -4? -110 for Game -------->Winnah!!!
10 DIMES San Diego Chargers -5 -110 for Game ----> WINNER
10 DIMES Cincinnati Bengals +1 -115 for Game----->Winnah!!

this is who I am playing... obviously Lang is opposite....GL:SIB

 

[Cash Man]

damn.. i want to take the steelers today, but I must stick to the fade strategy for now.... i want to prove you can make money fading this punk...

 

[Cash Man]

on second thought steelers are a huge public play.. i would fade that too.....

 

[bjfinste]

on second thought steelers are a huge public play.. i would fade that too.....

:shrug:

All the consensus sites I have seen shows Minnesota as the "public" play, even at the lower numbers. Here's one site's numbers:


Consensus on ATS
Visitor Wagers Line Home Wagers Line
Minnesota 1110 +6 Pittsburgh 675 -6
Minnesota 529 +5.5 Pittsburgh 361 -5.5
Minnesota 64 +5 Pittsburgh 53 -5
Minnesota 55 +4.5 Pittsburgh 36 -4.5
Minnesota 1131 +4 Pittsburgh 665 -4
Minnesota 2889 Pittsburgh 1790

 

[Macgruder23]

check your numbers again---Minnesota huge public play...GO STEELERS

 

[Cash Man]

San Diego looking great so far.....

 

[Theboundbook]

check your numbers again---Minnesota huge public play...GO STEELERS

Minny was public play.... HUGE REVERSE LINE MOVEMENT.... OBVIOUS TRAP.... Pitt is "Holding Back" IMO. They seemed so non chalaunt (sp?) about that 1st half. BUT, when they got down to business with that 2 min. drill, really, no mistakes, and an OBVIOUS WELL OILED, CONFIDENT, MACHINE THAT SCORES POINTS.... So, I understand their lax play the rest of that 1st half....

And nice to see more pts on the board, 1st poss. of the 2nd half for PITT!

 

[PocketAces]

50 DIMES New York Jets -6 -110 for Game
10 DIMES New Orleans Saints -6? -105 for Game
10 DIMES Dallas Cowboys -4? -110 for Game
10 DIMES San Diego Chargers -5 -110 for Game
10 DIMES Cincinnati Bengals +1 -115 for Game

this is who I am playing... obviously Lang is opposite....GL:SIB

So, you could go 4-1 and still LOSE money?

:shrug:

 

[Cash Man]

So, you could go 4-1 and still LOSE money?

:shrug:

his 50 dime was oakland.. if I want to match his plays in a fade type way.. this is how I am going to do it... my buddy made $2195 since the beginning of October playing it this way while assigning dollar and 5 dollar values to the dime plays.. obviously the 50 dime, I did not put 500 on..just 50.. we'll see what happens, but in order to do a proper fade study, i'm going to do it like this...:SIB

 

[PocketAces]

his 50 dime was oakland.. if I want to match his plays in a fade type way.. this is how I am going to do it... my buddy made $2195 since the beginning of October playing it this way while assigning dollar and 5 dollar values to the dime plays.. obviously the 50 dime, I did not put 500 on..just 50.. we'll see what happens, but in order to do a proper fade study, i'm going to do it like this...:SIB

I am not saying fading Lang is a bad idea. It is a GREAT idea. If I were to do it I'd still fade every play but flat bet them.

I've been following the thread "across the street" it seems to be a personal ATM for many people.

 

[77sticks]

I am not saying fading Lang is a bad idea. It is a GREAT idea. If I were to do it I'd still fade every play but flat bet them.

I've been following the thread "across the street" it seems to be a personal ATM for many people.

Actually if you read the thread "across the street" you would see that it is not that profitable to flat bet everyone of his bets. Lang will go 8-7 for a week but lose two 50 dimes bet. If you flat bet then you would lose money but if you followed his betting style you would be up a lot.

 

[PocketAces]

Actually if you read the thread "across the street" you would see that it is not that profitable to flat bet everyone of his bets. Lang will go 8-7 for a week but lose two 50 dimes bet. If you flat bet then you would lose money but if you followed his betting style you would be up a lot.

I do read that crazy thread. I'm just saying what I would do. The thought of going 4-1 on a day and losing money seems odd to me.

So Lang is a winning bettor on the smaller plays but a loser on just the big plays?

If that is the case why not just bet his side of the small plays and then fade the big ones?

 

[Cash Man]

I do read that crazy thread. I'm just saying what I would do. The thought of going 4-1 on a day and losing money seems odd to me.

So Lang is a winning bettor on the smaller plays but a loser on just the big plays?

If that is the case why not just bet his side of the small plays and then fade the big ones?

case in point.. he went 0-3 the last 2 Saturdays

 

[77sticks]

I do read that crazy thread. I'm just saying what I would do. The thought of going 4-1 on a day and losing money seems odd to me.

So Lang is a winning bettor on the smaller plays but a loser on just the big plays?

If that is the case why not just bet his side of the small plays and then fade the big ones?

No he is a losing bettor. I am not going to break down the thread. Re-read it if you need any clarification.

 

[Cash Man]

gladi decided to lay off that steelers play!


then again.......maybe not..lol

 

[PocketAces]

No he is a losing bettor. I am not going to break down the thread. Re-read it if you need any clarification.

Well both of your statements can not be true. Think about it.

 

[77sticks]

Well both of your statements can not be true. Think about it.

Ok. Then you play his smaller plays. You seem to have this all figured out.

 

[Cash Man]

50 DIMES New York Jets -6 -110 for Game ------>HUGE WINNAH
10 DIMES New Orleans Saints -6 -105 for Game
10 DIMES Dallas Cowboys -4? -110 for Game -------->Winnah!!!
10 DIMES San Diego Chargers -5 -110 for Game ----> WINNER
10 DIMES Cincinnati Bengals +1 -115 for Game----->Winnah!!

this is who I am playing... obviously Lang is opposite....GL:SIB

:00hour :00hour :00hour :00hour :00hour

I am fading lang for the rest of the season!!!!!!!! and the New Orleans game is now looking possible:0corn :0corn :00hour

 

[Cash Man]

If this New orleans play hits somehow.. I will be up $2000 over yesterday and today fading Lang!!!!! he was 0-3 yesterday

 

[shamrock]

cash, who does he have tonight?