Charlie Gibson Interviews Palin

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
28,195
1,450
113
50
Earth
www.ffrf.org
http://abcnews.go.com/wn (not sure if this takes you just to the Palin interview because it's imbedded in the ABC page, but it will get you close)

Watch this interview and tell me you think she'd be perfect for the on deck circle of the most powerful position on earth. It's pathetic. There should be a snippets of the interview available, feel free to watch the one titled "Palin on God and War"....not good. It shows video of her in her church saying that (in regards to the troops) "our leaders are sending them out on a task that is from God". Charlie asked her some simple questions, and she danced around them. What a joke.

You get what you vote for boys. Better hope McCain is taking his pills and she has someone with more than good looks telling her what to do.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,580
228
63
"the bunker"
gibson.."can you look into the camera and honestly say i`m ready to be president?"

palin..."yes charlie,i`m ready"...

gibson..."doesn`t that take some hubris?"




:142smilie ..........priceless..
 

3 Seconds

Fcuk Frist
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2004
6,706
16
0
Marlton, NJ
She is rather clueless. What a mistake this choice was, she is in NO WAY ready to be C-I-C.




FORT WAINWRIGHT, Alaska - Vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin's assertion that she believes humans play a role in climate change ? made in her first major interview since joining the Republican ticket ? is at odds with her previous statements.


Palin said she didn't disagree with scientists that the problem can be attributed to "man's activities."

"Show me where I have ever said that there's absolute proof that nothing that man has ever conducted or engaged in has had any effect or no effect on climate change. I have not said that," Palin told ABC News in an interview broadcast Thursday and Friday.

However, in the past Palin has said she does not believe global warming is caused by human activity. She has told the Internet news site Newsmax, "A changing environment will affect Alaska more than any other state, because of our location. ... I'm not one, though, who would attribute it to being man-made."

In an interview with a Fairbanks newspaper within the last year, Palin said: "I'm not an Al Gore, doom-and-gloom environmentalist blaming the changes in our climate on human activity." ABC cited the interview as being at odds with her statement.

Republican presidential candidate John McCain has said humans have caused climate change.

In the ABC interview, Palin said she believes that "man's activities certainly can be contributing to the issue of global warming, climate change. ... Regardless, though, of the reason for climate change, whether it's entirely, wholly caused by man's activities or is part of the cyclical nature of our planet ? the warming and the cooling trends ? regardless of that, John McCain and I agree that we gotta do something about it."

Palin also said that while she had not met any foreign heads of state, many other vice presidents may not have, either. However, the vice presidents who have served since 1977 ? George H.W. Bush, the former ambassador to China and CIA director; Dick Cheney, chief of staff for President Ford and defense secretary for Bush; and Sens. Walter Mondale, Dan Quayle and Gore ? likely would have met heads of state and other foreign leaders because of their extensive experience in the federal government.

Questions about Palin's knowledge of foreign policy dominated the interview with ABC's Charles Gibson. Palin repeated her earlier assertions that she's ready to be president if called upon, yet she sidestepped questions on whether she had the national security credentials needed to be commander in chief.

Republican presidential candidate John McCain has defended his running mate's qualifications, citing her command of the Alaska National Guard and Alaska's proximity to Russia.

Pressed about what insights into recent Russian actions she gained by living in Alaska, Palin told Gibson, "They're our next-door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska."

Palin, 44, has been Alaska's governor for less than two years and before that was a small-town mayor. Asked whether those were sufficient credentials, Palin said: "It is about reform of government and it's about putting government back on the side of the people, and that has much to do with foreign policy and national security issues."

She said she brings expertise in making the country energy independent as a former chairman of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission.

Palin said that other than a trip to visit soldiers in Kuwait and Germany last year, her only other foreign travel was to Mexico and Canada. She also:

_Appeared unsure of the Bush doctrine ? essentially that the United States must help spread democracy to stop terrorism and that the nation will act pre-emptively to stop potential foes.

Asked whether she agreed with that, Palin said: "In what respect, Charlie?" Gibson pressed her for an interpretation of it. She said: "His world view." That prompted Gibson to say "no, the Bush doctrine, enunciated September 2002, before the Iraq war" and describe it to her.

"I believe that what President Bush has attempted to do is rid this world of Islamic extremism, terrorists who are hell bent on destroying our nation," Palin said, though she added "there have been mistakes made."

Pressed repeatedly on whether the United States could attack terrorist hideouts in Pakistan without the country's permission, she said: "If there is legitimate and enough intelligence that tells us that a strike is imminent against American people, we have every right to defend our country. In fact, the president has the obligation, the duty to defend."

_Said nuclear weapons in Iran's hands are dangerous, and said "we've got to put the pressure on Iran." Asked three times what her position would be if Israel felt threatened enough to attack Iranian nuclear facilities, Palin repeatedly said the United States shouldn't "second guess" Israel's steps to secure itself.

_Called for Georgia and the Ukraine to be included in NATO, a treaty that requires the U.S. to defend them militarily. She also said Russia's attack into Georgia last month was "unprovoked." Asked to clarify that she'd support going to war over Georgia, she said: "Perhaps so."

On the environment, Palin said she disagreed with McCain's position against oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska.

"We'll agree to disagree," she said, "but I'm gonna keep pushing that and I think eventually we're all gonna come together on that one."
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
gibson.."can you look into the camera and honestly say i`m ready to be president?"

palin..."yes charlie,i`m ready"...

gibson..."doesn`t that take some hubris?"




:142smilie ..........priceless..

So Wease were you impressed?
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
Non of our usual Republican apologists have a comment? Must be waiting to get the official spin from Rush or Fox! :0corn
 

SixFive

bonswa
Forum Member
Mar 12, 2001
18,748
250
83
54
BG, KY, USA
it's certainly not hubris. I think she's fairly down to earth and humble. Did you want her to say she was unqualified? :shrug:

she's no more unqualified than Barack Obama. If we're going to talk qualifications, that has to be fair game. Attacking a vp candidate for no qualifications is laughable when the other presidential candidate is so weak. Gary, I think I've read that you won't be voting for Obama or McCain but a third party, so I take it you think Obama is wholly unqualified as well? I can respect that and at least say it's consistent. Those who attack Palin for not being qualified but support Obama and let him skate on no qualifications are the joke. Her faith in God also doesn't bother me as it does you. I actually like her more than I do McCain.

If I thought a third party had a chance in hell of winning, I would vote third party. Since they don't, I'll have to vote against the candidate I like the least. Pretty sad, really, that both our candidates are so bad.
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
She is rather clueless. What a mistake this choice was, she is in NO WAY ready to be C-I-C.

and obama does ??...:mj07: :mj07:

at least she is not at the top of the ticket like the dems have...& at least she has some executive experience...obama has been in the senate for about 3.5 years of which 19 months he has been campaigning for the presidency.....obama is all show & no grit...that is why he is going to lose & it highlights another example of why the dems don't get it....to paraphrase robert redford....the dems should be dismantled if they don't win the presidency......
 
Last edited:

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
One with snap judgment that don't blink. Should scare chit out of you. Were lucky it's VP only and old John does not kick. And not knowing on 9/11 what Bush Doctrian is.
 

Terryray

Say Parlay
Forum Member
Dec 6, 2001
9,669
1,770
113
Kansas City area for who knows how long....
...at least she is not at the top of the ticket like the dems have....


exactly. And after year or so as VP, hearing all the decision-making and sitting in on many of those Nat'l security meetings, she'll be brought up to speed anyway.

New AP poll out today shows 47% think Obama lacks "right experience" vs Palin 36%.

McCain picking her has created some gains for him, which I expect won't dimish much. Her thin resume just puts a glaring light on Obama's. Her pluck and ability to stand up to the boys, a woman who got where she did on her own--without riding the husband's connections, money and position (very rare for any of the dem's female leaders)--make her (along with other obvious things) attractive to the blue-collar white voter Obama needs more of and is not getting it (like nearly all the past Dem seekers for this office in recent memory. Perot is who really helped Clinton the first time)

Race is far from over, there is time for Dems to take back momentum.

But Obama campaign wasting time attacking a VP choice (Dems made that mistake vs Dan Qualye), not focusing on their main advantage-handling the economy, and yet again stupidly attacking a Republican's religiosity, like that ever helped (but those snobbish leftists can't help themselves). That said, gotta love those Pentecostals!
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
exactly. And after year or so as VP, hearing all the decision-making and sitting in on many of those Nat'l security meetings, she'll be brought up to speed anyway.

New AP poll out today shows 47% think Obama lacks "right experience" vs Palin 36%.

terry...

i find it funny how the dems are attacking palin because she is not experienced.....they act like the guy at the top of their ticket has all the experience in the world...too bad they can't reverse the ticket(i many people would feel better) because biden is a better candidate than obama......but the only problem is...he doesn't connect with the voters..
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,580
228
63
"the bunker"
and obama does ??...:mj07: :mj07:

at least she is not at the top of the ticket like the dems have...& at least she has some executive experience...obama has been in the senate for about 3.5 years of which 19 months he has been campaigning for the presidency.....obama is all show & no grit...that is why he is going to lose & it highlights another example of why the dems don't get it....to paraphrase robert redford....the dems should be dismantled if they don't win the presidency......

yeah...the community organizer`s the experienced guy....lol...i want to hear more about those "57" states in our union(actually,there are 57 muslim states....oops!)....

ii will say this...she made a HUGE mistake letting those lefties at abc edit the interview...should have made them agree to air it unedited....

lesson learned...

btw...that pinky ring wearing,looking down the glasses at the end of his nose snob/metrosexual charlie gibson is getting his ass reemed for the disrespectful way he handled the interview....

believe me...this is good...every perceived insult gains her more votes...

the dunces on the left...always willing to fulfill a self-defeating prophecy......;)
 

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
28,195
1,450
113
50
Earth
www.ffrf.org
she's no more unqualified than Barack Obama. If we're going to talk qualifications, that has to be fair game. Attacking a vp candidate for no qualifications is laughable when the other presidential candidate is so weak. Gary, I think I've read that you won't be voting for Obama or McCain but a third party, so I take it you think Obama is wholly unqualified as well? I can respect that and at least say it's consistent. Those who attack Palin for not being qualified but support Obama and let him skate on no qualifications are the joke. Her faith in God also doesn't bother me as it does you. I actually like her more than I do McCain.

If I thought a third party had a chance in hell of winning, I would vote third party. Since they don't, I'll have to vote against the candidate I like the least. Pretty sad, really, that both our candidates are so bad.

That's right, Clint. I can't get on the Obama bandwagon because I don't understand what got him to this position. I won't vote for another run of Bush, so I'd vote for Obama if I had to pick.

Do you think a 3rd party will ever have a shot as long as people keep your mindset? Very defeatest. I find it disheartening how people hold onto their one vote (which means absolutely nothing in the grand scheme of things if you vote for one of the 2 major candidates) like it's a real difference maker. You've got one voice, and so do I. I think mine is more likely to be heard, even if it doesn't count towards who wins.
 

Hard Times

Registered
Forum Member
Jan 17, 2005
809
0
0
That's right, Clint. I can't get on the Obama bandwagon because I don't understand what got him to this position. I won't vote for another run of Bush, so I'd vote for Obama if I had to pick.

Do you think a 3rd party will ever have a shot as long as people keep your mindset? Very defeatest. I find it disheartening how people hold onto their one vote (which means absolutely nothing in the grand scheme of things if you vote for one of the 2 major candidates) like it's a real difference maker. You've got one voice, and so do I. I think mine is more likely to be heard, even if it doesn't count towards who wins.

Yes I agree 100 % gmroz22. I'll vote Nader for the simple reason that he knows he can't win but he's right on top of the corp. corruption issue. If a third party gets 3 or 4 % this time maybe they get 5 to 10 % next time. You have to start the ball rolling at some point and time. Bigger % leads to a better candidate.Third party will be the salvation of this country,if its not to late.
 

pirate fan

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2002
880
1
18
it's certainly not hubris. I think she's fairly down to earth and humble. Did you want her to say she was unqualified? :shrug:

she's no more unqualified than Barack Obama. If we're going to talk qualifications, that has to be fair game. Attacking a vp candidate for no qualifications is laughable when the other presidential candidate is so weak. Gary, I think I've read that you won't be voting for Obama or McCain but a third party, so I take it you think Obama is wholly unqualified as well? I can respect that and at least say it's consistent. Those who attack Palin for not being qualified but support Obama and let him skate on no qualifications are the joke. Her faith in God also doesn't bother me as it does you. I actually like her more than I do McCain.

If I thought a third party had a chance in hell of winning, I would vote third party. Since they don't, I'll have to vote against the candidate I like the least. Pretty sad, really, that both our candidates are so bad.


AMEN!!!:director:
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top