I've posted my good, ole, trusty Spreadsheet's plays in the past and it's making it's 2013 debut this week so I think I'll share it's plays again this season. It's as good as all the data I gotta feed it and that is why I gotta wait till week 4 or 5 to start using it. It usually gets better and better cause it ADDS data to what it already "knows' as the weeks go by. It is one hell of a complex monster cause it ADJUSTS, based on each teams previous games, the stats most bettors use from the matchups for the current week's stats in the matchups thingy. I'll write more about it if somebody is interested, but the PLICKS is what matters, right? 
IF anybody's curious about how it did in the past, you'll have to go into the archives cause I don't think I posted it's picks last season and maybe even the season before. Sorry, but I ain't consistent with these things.
Ok, here's what it gave me for this week....
Virg. Tech - whatever it was : Sorry, I know this one is a done deal, but it was a highly rated pick and the first one that it spit out. Could kick myself for not going with the M.L. FLUCK! The "SS" (SpreadSheet) is really good at picking dogs that win outright even though I do give it the spread no. and it does pick with the spread "in mind". . Didn't go for it (M.L.) cause it's just a little too early to start that stuff.
S. Carolina-7: I usually shave a half or more from this no. but it's a strong selection and I'm gonna take my chances with the "-7".
Iowa -2: Always think this no. is a trap :scared . Sometimes I just don't play the "SS's" picks and just stay away from the match. There is one reason that I'll go along with the "plick" though - IMO, Minny has been eating up too many cream puffs
Also think that Iowa can play away without a problem and still has some players that were a part of that ASS KICKIN defense they've had in previous years.
Army pk: Be careful with teams like these two (other one is L.A. Tech). Just a different level/brand of footsbawl.
Ohio St. -7: I'll pass; just too competitive for me.
Ariz. St. -4: Like this play and LUV the no. (4 is a "lucky" line) Keep tract of that no. and see what you think.
Conn pk': Only comment I can make is that this is one HARD LUCK team. Just terrible what them players go through. I gotta trust the "SS" on this play.
That's it's top selections, Good Luck.
IF anybody's curious about how it did in the past, you'll have to go into the archives cause I don't think I posted it's picks last season and maybe even the season before. Sorry, but I ain't consistent with these things.
Ok, here's what it gave me for this week....
Virg. Tech - whatever it was : Sorry, I know this one is a done deal, but it was a highly rated pick and the first one that it spit out. Could kick myself for not going with the M.L. FLUCK! The "SS" (SpreadSheet) is really good at picking dogs that win outright even though I do give it the spread no. and it does pick with the spread "in mind". . Didn't go for it (M.L.) cause it's just a little too early to start that stuff.
S. Carolina-7: I usually shave a half or more from this no. but it's a strong selection and I'm gonna take my chances with the "-7".
Iowa -2: Always think this no. is a trap :scared . Sometimes I just don't play the "SS's" picks and just stay away from the match. There is one reason that I'll go along with the "plick" though - IMO, Minny has been eating up too many cream puffs
Army pk: Be careful with teams like these two (other one is L.A. Tech). Just a different level/brand of footsbawl.
Ohio St. -7: I'll pass; just too competitive for me.
Ariz. St. -4: Like this play and LUV the no. (4 is a "lucky" line) Keep tract of that no. and see what you think.
Conn pk': Only comment I can make is that this is one HARD LUCK team. Just terrible what them players go through. I gotta trust the "SS" on this play.
That's it's top selections, Good Luck.

