Democrats War on Women

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
so i go into free stuff website.


listed is 1000 dollar gift card for wal mart


I figure well thats a good one to have


so I click on it and it pops up to qualify answer

male/female

age

do you shop at wallmart

do you use facebook

ok so I qualify

put in your email address


this is why i hate free stuff, its full of crap

you aint getting 1000 bucks you are getting five million ads for wal mart in your email

wtf:facepalm:
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
President Obama and his wife, Michele, gave a total of $48,000 in tax-free gifts to their daughters, according to tax records made public on Friday.

The president and his wife separately gave each daughter a $12,000 gift under a section of the federal tax code that exempts such donations from federal taxes.

There is nothing illegal about the president?s taking advantage of this tax shelter, but it does raise eyebrows given that he has lamented the myriad tax exemptions used by the wealthy??millionaires and billionaires? like himself?to pay less in taxes. He has yet to propose a comprehensive plan to reform the byzantine tax code.

The Obama?s tax return indicates that the gifts, likely for their daughter?s college educations, began in 2007, when the maximum exemptible amount was $24,000 per couple. The maximum exemption has since increased to $26,000 per couple.

The Obamas paid a total federal tax rate of 20.5 percent on a gross adjusted income $789,674, which would typically fall within the top federal rate of 35 percent. According to an analysis of the president?s tax return, he may have paid a lower rate than his secretary despite making more than eight times as much money as she did.

His most recent tax proposal?the so-called ?Buffett Rule??would increase taxes on about 4,000 millionaires and raise about $4.7 billion in new revenue per year, enough to cover about 0.4 percent of the projected budget deficit in 2012. Though the rule would apparently not hit the president himself.

Supporters of the rule have acknowledged that the projected revenue from the ?Buffett Rule,? which the Democratic-led Senate is expected to vote down, is ?not even a meaningful small amount.?

The Obama?s untaxed gift to their daughters will leave American taxpayers to subsidize the college education of the children of the multi-millionaire Obamas

................................................................

read the article then read that last part

they are putting money aside for their daughters education and somehow this fawk comes up with we are having to pay for their education ?

wtf

the exemption was legit just like Romney hiding his billion in the caymans and not paying tax

so we are subsidiizing the Romneys five sons education because ..............

blah blah blah

this is such bullchit
 

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,937
738
113
50
TX
President Obama and his wife, Michele, gave a total of $48,000 in tax-free gifts to their daughters, according to tax records made public on Friday.

The president and his wife separately gave each daughter a $12,000 gift under a section of the federal tax code that exempts such donations from federal taxes.

There is nothing illegal about the president?s taking advantage of this tax shelter, but it does raise eyebrows given that he has lamented the myriad tax exemptions used by the wealthy??millionaires and billionaires? like himself?to pay less in taxes. He has yet to propose a comprehensive plan to reform the byzantine tax code.

The Obama?s tax return indicates that the gifts, likely for their daughter?s college educations, began in 2007, when the maximum exemptible amount was $24,000 per couple. The maximum exemption has since increased to $26,000 per couple.

The Obamas paid a total federal tax rate of 20.5 percent on a gross adjusted income $789,674, which would typically fall within the top federal rate of 35 percent. According to an analysis of the president?s tax return, he may have paid a lower rate than his secretary despite making more than eight times as much money as she did.

His most recent tax proposal?the so-called ?Buffett Rule??would increase taxes on about 4,000 millionaires and raise about $4.7 billion in new revenue per year, enough to cover about 0.4 percent of the projected budget deficit in 2012. Though the rule would apparently not hit the president himself.

Supporters of the rule have acknowledged that the projected revenue from the ?Buffett Rule,? which the Democratic-led Senate is expected to vote down, is ?not even a meaningful small amount.?

The Obama?s untaxed gift to their daughters will leave American taxpayers to subsidize the college education of the children of the multi-millionaire Obamas

................................................................

read the article then read that last part

they are putting money aside for their daughters education and somehow this fawk comes up with we are having to pay for their education ?

wtf

the exemption was legit just like Romney hiding his billion in the caymans and not paying tax

so we are subsidiizing the Romneys five sons education because ..............

blah blah blah

this is such bullchit

for once Scott I agree with you...nothing wrong with giving your kids money to shelter the government from getting it when you die
 

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,937
738
113
50
TX
uh because when it was stated she never worked


out of her own mouth she said

I raised five boys and it was hell


she didnt say I raised five boys with two nannys and I drank mint julips all day and never changed a chitty diaper.

thats why

Romney / Palin

My grandmother did not work, she raised my mom and aunt:shrug: who gives a shit, Romney and his wife could afford nanny's...its nothing more than jealousy
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
My grandmother did not work, she raised my mom and aunt:shrug: who gives a shit, Romney and his wife could afford nanny's...its nothing more than jealousy
..............................................................

hedge try deep thinking sometime

the mittster is playing his wife off as a hard working stay at home mom who changed shitty diapers and ran ragged with five boys.

the reality is............


she came from a wealthy family. She married the Mittster young

I like the woman, they just dont need to make her something she is not and lie about it.

she is unable to represent working class woman
and thats just the truth.

you think she ever even wrote a check to pay a bill in her life ? I doubt it.

they have a differant life
 
Last edited:

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
As a senate candidate in 1994, Mitt Romney claimed life has changed since the 1960s and "now Mom and Dad both have to work whether they want to or not."

"This is a different world than it was in the 1960s when I was growing up, when you used to have Mom at home and Dad at work," Romney said, as shown in a video posted by BuzzFeed's Andrew Kaczynski. "Now Mom and Dad both have to work whether they want to or not, and usually one of them has two jobs."

Romney made the remark while touting Bright Horizons Family Solutions, a childcare company. The comment is a sharp contrast to Romney's latest argument that "all moms are working moms."

The Romney campaign came to the defense of stay-at-home moms after Democratic strategist Hilary Rosen criticized Ann Romney for having "never worked a day in her life." Both the Romney campaign and the Republican National Committee used the remark as fodder for fundraising, using Google ads and items like bumper stickers and coffee cups tout their suport working moms.

..................................................................

Etch+a+Sketch+Einstein.jpg


I guess Santoriim knew correctly about the Mittster and his changing ways.
 
Last edited:

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
Ann Romney's nanny: "It's true that Ann Romney never worked a day in her life."

The woman who worked as nanny to Ann and her brothers at the time Ann was dating Mitt called in to Stephanie Miller's show today. She said that it was her job to do all the work, even take care of Ann's horse, during those years - and repeated several times that, while both Ann and Mitt are nice people, it's true that "Ann never worked a day in her life."

...............................................................


she didnt even take care of her own horse.

:SIB :facepalm:

ok hedge , are you beginning to see the picture now ?
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
22,273
1,443
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
Ann Romney's nanny: "It's true that Ann Romney never worked a day in her life."

The woman who worked as nanny to Ann and her brothers at the time Ann was dating Mitt called in to Stephanie Miller's show today. She said that it was her job to do all the work, even take care of Ann's horse, during those years - and repeated several times that, while both Ann and Mitt are nice people, it's true that "Ann never worked a day in her life."

...............................................................


she didnt even take care of her own horse.

:SIB :facepalm:

ok hedge , are you beginning to see the picture now ?

My neighbor bought a new car, it isn't fair.

:facepalm:
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
106,198
2,413
113
71
home
My grandmother did not work, she raised my mom and aunt:shrug: who gives a shit, Romney and his wife could afford nanny's...its nothing more than jealousy

345yu85sw7.gif
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
democrats are so jealous of successful people its not even funny.

dude the Mittster is running for President

Obama and Hillary had to take it, but when the Mittster gets some heat then its jealousy ?
:lol:

you want to give the Mittster a free pass when he aint even been vetted yet


the shitstorm is coming
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
The problem with Mitt Romney is he appears to only do those things that will enhance his public image or personal fortunes. A guy like that will never let ethics stand in the way of a good payday. No matter who gets hurt. Take this latest scandal, which started on the Daily Beast and then was quickly removed.

"SALT LAKE CITY ? A new report raises questions about one of Mitt Romney's sources of campaign money, who was also a key figure in the Olympic bribery scandal and the subsequent trial.

The Daily Beast reports the donor, New Jersey travel-company executive Sead Dizdarevic, became an immunized witness during the 2003 trial stemming from the Olympic bribery scandal.

He testified at the corruption trial of Salt Lake Olympic directors Tom Welch and David Johnson that he and his sister-in-law had delivered $131,000 in cash contributions to the defendants in hopes of securing an exclusive Olympic hospitality contract.

The report says after Romney took over running the Olympics, Dizdarevic was awarded an exclusive, elite travel package contract anyway. The Daily Beast says now Dizdarevic, his family, his company and his business associates have donated more than $1 million to Romney's campaign."

Romney controlled over 2 billion dollars in contracts as the "Savior of the Salt Lake Olympics". The money came from the U.S. taxpayer, and was assailed by such notables as John McCain for being an outrageous example of taxpayer abuse. Romney also had his eye on becoming POTUS long before the Olympics.

After the Olympic scandal became public, it appears that Romney cut his own little deal with Dizdarevic and still awarded him the monopoly on travel packages and event tickets. Undoubtedly, Dizdarevic, who was at the center of the scandal, should have been excluded based on that which Romney holds nearest and dearest, the appearance of gross impropriety.

The real question, of course, is when is Romney working for U.S. taxpayers and when is he working for his own self-enrichment? The POTUS has trillions of dollars in contracts he can influence through the use of Executive Orders and the bureaucracy. Why be a billionaire at other's expense when you can be a trillionaire?

Greed is just as big a part of Romney's persona as any other attribute, and greed leads to ethics scandals. Some view Dizdarevic as nothing more than a monopolistic Olympic ticket scalper, who looks at bribes as just the cost of doing business.

"Dizdarevic's base of operations is in Far Hills, N.J., and his companies have seven other offices around the world. Business has more than tripled since the Athens Olympics of 2004, Jet Set President Mark Lewis said.
The key to that success is simple: Dizdarevic knows tickets are the currency of Olympic travel. Olympic organizations sell tickets to the public for as much as $1,100 a seat at premier events. For those that he controls, Dizdarevic adds at least a 20 percent markup on top of face-value prices.

But the same tickets can generate a much higher profit margin when combined with hotels, transportation and meals to form expensive packages.

These packages are, for the most part, unregulated by Olympic officials, who allow Dizdarevic's companies to charge whatever he wants to sponsors, corporate VIPs and the general public.

Exercising his rights as an official Olympic "sponsor" for the host city's organizing committee and many other Olympic organizations around the globe, Dizdarevic buys a secret pot of tens of thousands of tickets that he controls and resells. He also sews up large numbers of the best hotel rooms in every host city ? often years in advance.

His companies amassed 125,000 tickets for Vancouver and Whistler ? about 8 percent of the 1.6 million total.

"We are the largest buyer of tickets to the Olympics," Lewis said, adding that the companies also control as many as 2,000 hotel rooms. Dizdarevic's dual roles as a ticket broker and travel-package provider give him convenient options: He can transfer tickets from one market to the other ? in some cases, his critics say, artificially creating supply and demand according to his own whim.

"In effect, CoSport and Jet Set have a monopoly on legally valid tickets," says Moriarty, the Houston lawyer, who researched Olympic ticketing after getting scammed by another agency for Beijing tickets. "And what they seek to do is screw the consumers by bundling housing and tickets together to get more than what the housing is worth, and what the tickets are worth, because without them, you don't go." (Source)
Artificial demand drives prices up that much further, and thanks to Mitt Romney, the man who was at the center of the Salt Lake Olympic's scandal, was still permitted to make a significant profit from it. By accepting 1 million dollars from the man who some blame for the Salt Lake Scandal. Mitt Romney shows that he was never as interested in cleaning things up as he was in profitting from the mess.

Ron Paul will benefit as more scandals come to light. After all, he doesn't have any reported ethical lapses like the slick Mittster. If somehow Romney did win, we could expect more Congressional investigations into his other business dealings. After all, his greed has made him an easy target
.................................................................

go Ron Paul !
 

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,937
738
113
50
TX
Really? That's your takeaway?

they want to redistribute the wealth, tax the shit out of us people who are successful, that is the reason I am a Republican, people should work for what they have and if they will not work then fuck em, hope they starve to death
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
22,273
1,443
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
The problem with Mitt Romney is he appears to only do those things that will enhance his public image or personal fortunes. A guy like that will never let ethics stand in the way of a good payday. No matter who gets hurt. Take this latest scandal, which started on the Daily Beast and then was quickly removed.

"SALT LAKE CITY ? A new report raises questions about one of Mitt Romney's sources of campaign money, who was also a key figure in the Olympic bribery scandal and the subsequent trial.

The Daily Beast reports the donor, New Jersey travel-company executive Sead Dizdarevic, became an immunized witness during the 2003 trial stemming from the Olympic bribery scandal.

He testified at the corruption trial of Salt Lake Olympic directors Tom Welch and David Johnson that he and his sister-in-law had delivered $131,000 in cash contributions to the defendants in hopes of securing an exclusive Olympic hospitality contract.

The report says after Romney took over running the Olympics, Dizdarevic was awarded an exclusive, elite travel package contract anyway. The Daily Beast says now Dizdarevic, his family, his company and his business associates have donated more than $1 million to Romney's campaign."

Romney controlled over 2 billion dollars in contracts as the "Savior of the Salt Lake Olympics". The money came from the U.S. taxpayer, and was assailed by such notables as John McCain for being an outrageous example of taxpayer abuse. Romney also had his eye on becoming POTUS long before the Olympics.

After the Olympic scandal became public, it appears that Romney cut his own little deal with Dizdarevic and still awarded him the monopoly on travel packages and event tickets. Undoubtedly, Dizdarevic, who was at the center of the scandal, should have been excluded based on that which Romney holds nearest and dearest, the appearance of gross impropriety.

The real question, of course, is when is Romney working for U.S. taxpayers and when is he working for his own self-enrichment? The POTUS has trillions of dollars in contracts he can influence through the use of Executive Orders and the bureaucracy. Why be a billionaire at other's expense when you can be a trillionaire?

Greed is just as big a part of Romney's persona as any other attribute, and greed leads to ethics scandals. Some view Dizdarevic as nothing more than a monopolistic Olympic ticket scalper, who looks at bribes as just the cost of doing business.

"Dizdarevic's base of operations is in Far Hills, N.J., and his companies have seven other offices around the world. Business has more than tripled since the Athens Olympics of 2004, Jet Set President Mark Lewis said.
The key to that success is simple: Dizdarevic knows tickets are the currency of Olympic travel. Olympic organizations sell tickets to the public for as much as $1,100 a seat at premier events. For those that he controls, Dizdarevic adds at least a 20 percent markup on top of face-value prices.

But the same tickets can generate a much higher profit margin when combined with hotels, transportation and meals to form expensive packages.

These packages are, for the most part, unregulated by Olympic officials, who allow Dizdarevic's companies to charge whatever he wants to sponsors, corporate VIPs and the general public.

Exercising his rights as an official Olympic "sponsor" for the host city's organizing committee and many other Olympic organizations around the globe, Dizdarevic buys a secret pot of tens of thousands of tickets that he controls and resells. He also sews up large numbers of the best hotel rooms in every host city ? often years in advance.

His companies amassed 125,000 tickets for Vancouver and Whistler ? about 8 percent of the 1.6 million total.

"We are the largest buyer of tickets to the Olympics," Lewis said, adding that the companies also control as many as 2,000 hotel rooms. Dizdarevic's dual roles as a ticket broker and travel-package provider give him convenient options: He can transfer tickets from one market to the other ? in some cases, his critics say, artificially creating supply and demand according to his own whim.

"In effect, CoSport and Jet Set have a monopoly on legally valid tickets," says Moriarty, the Houston lawyer, who researched Olympic ticketing after getting scammed by another agency for Beijing tickets. "And what they seek to do is screw the consumers by bundling housing and tickets together to get more than what the housing is worth, and what the tickets are worth, because without them, you don't go." (Source)
Artificial demand drives prices up that much further, and thanks to Mitt Romney, the man who was at the center of the Salt Lake Olympic's scandal, was still permitted to make a significant profit from it. By accepting 1 million dollars from the man who some blame for the Salt Lake Scandal. Mitt Romney shows that he was never as interested in cleaning things up as he was in profitting from the mess.

Ron Paul will benefit as more scandals come to light. After all, he doesn't have any reported ethical lapses like the slick Mittster. If somehow Romney did win, we could expect more Congressional investigations into his other business dealings. After all, his greed has made him an easy target
.................................................................

go Ron Paul !

Good one Scotty, you're a Big Obama Fan and would like people to VOTE for Ron Paul. :nono:
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
Good one Scotty, you're a Big Obama Fan and would like people to VOTE for Ron Paul. :nono:

...............................................................

no I want Ron Paul to somehow take the nomination , and then I vote for him.

don't read too much into the printed words Ronnie.

it just confuses hedge
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
Good one Scotty, you're a Big Obama Fan and would like people to VOTE for Ron Paul. :nono:

Skulnik,

You casually and easily cast aspersions at members who disagree with Mittens as Barry supporters, where I never see any evidence in their posts that they proclaim allegience to him.

You are like a blind hog with no skills probing a mine field.

You say you like Ron Paul, but you won't vote for because he has no chance to win. How many people do know have said that? Add to that the millions who believe the same thing !

There is plenty of evidence that the media, yes including Faux, and your hero, Glenda is in collusion to keep the Dr. off the air and minimize his significance in the race.

Proof That There Is Voter Fraud Being Perpetrated Against Ron Paul

Ron Paul Hints at Suspicion of Election Fraud


<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/tjuUWr9vaXo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/HtZcD6JegTc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

IT'S NOT A GRASS ROOTS MOVEMENT !

IT'S A BRUSH-FIRES OF THE MINDS !


Rising to the challenge is the first step that you take
Are you a free spirit or a slave?
Are the institutions that have molded our minds
Pushing an agenda filled with lies?
Have you ever asked yourself why things never change?
The rhetoric they speak is all the same
The men behind the curtain and the illusion they create
Pull the puppets strings and seal our fate

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/c8FNi6QxsUU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Definition of ASPERSION



1

: a sprinkling with water especially in religious ceremonies


2

a: a false or misleading charge meant to harm someone's reputation <cast aspersions on her integrity> b: the act of making such a charge : defamation
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top