This expansion of the traditional ?castle doctrine? law isn't the same as "This IS the castle doctrine"
Man you are a mental midget.
Eye witness for prosecution !
- Thread starter T
- Start date
This expansion of the traditional ?castle doctrine? law isn't the same as "This IS the castle doctrine"
Man you are a mental midget.
Wait, wait, guys, I've got it figured out.
Zimmerman = God.
All of the world is His castle. Thus, this falls under the castle doctrine.
Zimmerman = God.
All of the world is His castle. Thus, this falls under the castle doctrine.
i`m very leery of zimmerman`s motivations here concerning his neighborhood watch exploits while carrying around a "little" 9mm.....a frustrated wanna-be cop?...could be...
but the info layin`provided surprisingly hasn`t gotten much play considering the recent break-ins in that neighborhood....
could be a coincidence...or not...we`ll never know....
http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/03/26/v-fullstory/2714778/thousands-expected-at-trayvon.html
that said,"no evidence surfaced that the jewelry was stolen"....so who really knows?
emotional,complicated case....wouldn`t want to be on that jury...
Holy shit you are an asshole.
You are such a great role model for your kids :mj07: :mj07: :mj07:
You are just a hateful fat fucking loser, who can't even keep a wife.
you are splitting hairs :facepalm: the stand your ground law is an extension of the "castle doctrine" its the same fucking thing Saint, an extension of the law that defines castle doctrine is the same thing as the castle doctrine.
bottom line here is Zimmerman is innocent of any charges against him, he should not even be in a trial, If Trayvon would have been white this case would have never been in the news. Its reverse discrimination, its why I gave money to his defense fund, he is innocent
I'm not saying the guy should go to jail, I just thing he bit off more than he could chew. I think he will be acquitted due to the injuries he acquired but to call him totally innocent is a bit of a reach. If he stands down like 911 wanted him to, this doesn't happen.
No, it's not the same thing. The word castle applies to a domain. This happened outdoors. So, castle doctrine does not apply here.
Which, you keep saying over and over, it does.
Stand your ground is irrespective of location. Castle doctrine is not. They are 2 separate entities. Time to move on, you are wrong on this one.
And Hedge, you look more and more racist with your posts. What did the kid do wrong before he was in a fight with Zimmerman? What would make you think he is a thug? Are you implying that every black male wearing a hoodie walking the streets is a thug? Because of Internet pics of him flipping the camera off? White chicks are posting crazy shit all the time.
its all about race in this case. I dont think all kids in hoodies are thugs, kids running around in neighborhoods with hoodies and houses are being broken into that is another story, that is the story here. to me its justifiable homicide, Zimmerman was attacked but this hoodlum who was up to no good, wasn't Trayvon high on drugs at the time too?
It will all come out in court I just hope the jury can acquit him and not fear for their lives
We both agree on your first line and I didn't think for a second that you were happy that he was killed.
Trayvon's Death is the end result of this messy algebraic formula that has many different variables that can be argued on which are more important than others. That is why I believe neither of us will change the others mind. I can argue that GZ should have identified himself when he followed TM and should have let the police take over after the call. The other side can say, following someone is not a crime and TM does not have the right to beat GZ and he used self defense to protect himself.
I don't believe the jewelry in his locker is relevant to the night he was killed. If the jewelry or a weapon had been on his persons, then it becomes a stronger defense case. They found ice tea and skittles that were purchased from the convenient store.
Just saw Weasies post and he nailed it,
:0074:0074:0074
I was thinking of throwing some Kickserv like parlays out there all ending with Silva winning and then would hedge with Weidman straight up if they got that far. If I'm drawing dead going in to the last match, will probably take the shot on Weidman since it will still be a discounted shot at getting back to even/ahead.
- Feb 26, 2001
- 13,593
- 164
- 63
No, he wasn't. You are willing to kill a kid and you don't even know all the facts.
Seriously dude. You deserve the absolute worst.
really Tramp, THC was found in his system :shrug: :sadwave:
Martin?s autopsy shows he had tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), which is the active ingredient in marijuana, in his system, ABC News reported.
Read more: http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/05/17...martin-had-drugs-in-his-system/#ixzz2Xu3JZGZF
http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/05/17/new-evidence-trayvon-martin-had-drugs-in-his-system/
How long does marijuana actually stay in your system?
Now we get down to the meat of the question. If you have a particularly sensitive drug test then sure it can remain detectable for up to a month or a month and a half, but much longer than that is doubtful. No one really knows the actual time due to varying sensitivities of drug tests, different people?s weights and heights, amount of usage and time of usage.
However, I personally know that due to weekly tests it takes about 3 weeks for me pass a drug test for marijuana use. I weight about 200 pounds, and have a height of 6?3″. Everytime I go to probation I am clean, because I stop marijuana usage at least three weeks before. For those of you that are lesser weight and height you could most likely get away with going a couple days shorter, and heavier people a couple days longer. I don?t do anything special to try to fake, alter, or substitute the drug test, because the chances of getting that way are extremely high and not worth the risk. I just stop smoking three weeks before, and don?t even try to detox or cleanse my body by drinking lots of water.
Now what does this mean to you? You can use this as a basis to be sure that you can pass any urine test for marijuana, other people I know also stop smoking around 3 weeks before, and I am a pretty heavy smoker, at least once or twice a day when I can. So those people who say if you smoke, each time you smoke the amount of time it stays in your system is doubled or tripled and compounded, is pretty much false. There may be a small, small, tiny amount of THC in your system but it?s so small that it is negligible to any kind of drug test.
The Weed Smoker's Guide. I'm guessing that they may have some expertise in this.
So yeah, just because THC was found and present in his system did not mean that Trayvon was high. And for most, marijuana does NOT make one aggressive nor violent. Far from it. Just sayin'....
Peace!
http://weedsmokersguide.com/long-marijuana-stay-system/
- Feb 26, 2001
- 13,593
- 164
- 63
You said he was high. He was not high. It was a very small amount that was in his system.
You were incorrect, again.
He only got skittles... Anyone that has ever gotten high before knows that skittles isn't enough to cure the munchies.
He wasn't high
He wasn't high
did you even read the article?
"THC can stay in the human body for as long as 30 days or more"
Read more: http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/05/17...martin-had-drugs-in-his-system/#ixzz2XuANdYhU
seriously, you have zero critical thinking skills. you see something, draw your own conclusion without doing any research or real thinking, and decide your opinion is now fact.
- Feb 26, 2001
- 13,593
- 164
- 63
Where did you go, hedgy? Have you found another man in your neighborhood that is willing to protect you?
When we do medical exams for life insurance I tell my clients not to smoke weed for at least 30 days before we take blood and urine.
