For Liberal eyes only.. As not to offend.

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,489
168
63
Bowling Green Ky
--and I am back Edward after removing the only political sign I have ever had in my yard--and quess what--don't faint--it was for a democrat attorney running for states attorney (Joe Kirwin) and I could not even vote in his primary.
Qualification
25 years in business
over 100 trial by jury
over 10 capial murder cases
3 hearings in ky supreme court
My type of attorney despite political affilliations.

Was watching Kerry and Dean in Oregon and he will catch flak tomorrow over his BS. They will hammer him on flip floping again.
Seems he thought gas prices would be good area to bash Bush
When asked for his solution he said he'd tap into our reserves--must have Alzeimers as he forgot he was on record as saying he thought that would make little diff in Clintons administration
Wish someone would have asked him if his voting on gas tax increases 11 times was the solution. :)
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
uhhhh.......

uhhhh.......

""""Are you up for it. Or, do I have to continue to treat the blisters on the tips of my fingers responding to your ill-conceived posts."""


finger cots,counselor....we wouldn`t want those chubby little sausage fingers getting infected while you`re doing community service trying to educate the lower classes.....
 
Last edited:

Eddie Haskell

Matt 02-12-11
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2001
4,595
41
0
26
Cincinnati
aclu.org
Wayne:

Come on. Who you trying to kid. A Kentucky democrat is more conservative than most northern states republicans. Other than your governor and senators, it seems like everyone from the Commonwealth in the House and on a state and local level is a democrat.

As you and I both know, thats in name only. Who is that Congressman from Northern Kentucky, Lucas I think, who is a democrat. He has voted with Bush more times than most republicans from other states. Although I appreciate the gesture, I'm sure your democratic candidates endorsement is a very conservative vote on your behalf.

Eddie
 

Eddie Haskell

Matt 02-12-11
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2001
4,595
41
0
26
Cincinnati
aclu.org
Of course Wayne. I never meant to imply that all Republicans are idiots, morons, criminals, murderers, felons and otherwise evil. Just the majority.

Like John McCain and Abraham Lincoln, there are a few honest, good Republicans. Those are the only two that come to mind, however, I'm sure there are a few more.

How did your guy do in the primary. At this end of your state, it looks like Jeoff Davis (any relation to Jefferson Davis) won the republican primary and will face Nick Clooney (father of George) this fall for a seat in the House.

Should be fun. Now if only we could get Jerry Springer to run in Ohio we would have a great time this November.

Eddie
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,489
168
63
Bowling Green Ky
He lost :( Opponent was not a bad choice either though but I liked Joe


Assistant Commonwealth Attorney Chris Cohron has been elected Commonwealth Attorney, and will be sworn into office in January of 2005.

Cohron has served in the Commonwealth Attorney's office for several years, and defeated defense attorney Joe Kirwan in the Democratic primary on Tuesday; no Republicans are running for the office
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
springer would be great

springer would be great

if he could curb the urge to bounce checks to prostitutes...

c`mon jerr,pay the lady...
 

TossingSalads

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 24, 2004
472
0
0
58
Transcript from Russert/ Cheney interview

Transcript from Russert/ Cheney interview

Here are Honest-to-God (rush) excerpts from the transcript of Dick Cheney on "Meet the Press," forwarded to us by a BuzzFlash reader:

MR. RUSSERT: The Washington Post asked the American people about Saddam Hussein, and this is what they said: 69 percent said he was involved in the September 11 attacks. Are you surprised by that?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: No. I think it?s not surprising that people make that connection.

MR. RUSSERT: But is there a connection?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: We don?t know.

MR. RUSSERT: Vanity Fair magazine reports that about 140 Saudis were allowed to leave the United States the day after the 11th, allowed to leave our airspace and were never investigated by the FBI and that departure was approved by high-level administration figures. Do you know anything about that?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: I don?t.

MR. RUSSERT: Joe Lieberman, the senator from Connecticut, running for president, had this to say: ?...what President Bush gave the American people on Sunday night was a price tag??$87 billion??not a plan. And we in Congress must demand a plan.?

What is our plan for Iraq? How long will the 140,000 American soldiers be there? How many international troops will join them? And how much is this going to cost?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Well, some of those questions are unknowable at present, Tim. With respect to the financing, the $87 billion we?ve asked for is?about 3/4 of that is to support our military and security operations. About 1/4 of it will go specifically to helping make the investments Bremer believes we need to make in order to get the Iraqis back and functioning on their own capability.

So how long will it take? I don?t know.

MR. RUSSERT: In terms of costs, Mr. Vice President, there are suggestions again?it was a misjudgment by the administration or even misleading. ?Lawrence Lindsey, head of the White House?s National Economic Council, projected the ?upper bound? of war costs at $100 billion to $200 billion.?

We?ve already spent $160 billion after this $87 billion is spent. The Pentagon predicted $50 billion: ?The administration?s top budget official [Mitch Daniels] estimated that the cost of a war with Iraq could be in the range of $50 billion to $60 billion...he said...that earlier estimates of $100 billion to $200 billion in Iraq war costs by Lawrence Lindsey, Mr. Bush?s former chief economic adviser, were too high.?

And Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy secretary of Defense, went before Congress and said this: ?We?re dealing with a country that can really finance its own reconstruction, and relatively soon. The oil revenues of that country could bring between $50 and $100 billion over the course of the next two or three years.? It looked like the administration has truly misjudged the cost of this operation.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: No, I didn?t see a one-point estimate there that you could say that this is the administration?s estimate. We didn?t know.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: No, I didn?t see a one-point estimate there that you could say that this is the administration?s estimate. We didn?t know. And if you ask Secretary Rumsfeld, for example?I can remember from his briefings, he said repeatedly he didn?t know. And when you and I talked about it, I couldn?t put a dollar figure on it.

MR. RUSSERT: But Daniels did say $50 billion.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Well, that might have been, but I don?t know what his basis was for making that judgment.

There are funds frozen, Iraqi assets in various places in...

MR. RUSSERT: How much is all that?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: I don?t have a final dollar figure. We don?t know who will...

MR. RUSSERT: Why is there no bidding?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: I have no idea. ..... I don?t know any of the details of the contract because I deliberately stayed away from any information on that, but Halliburton is a fine company.

MR. RUSSERT: Reconstituted nuclear weapons. You misspoke.

VICE PRES. CHENEY: Yeah. I did misspeak.

MR. RUSSERT: Now, Ambassador Joe Wilson, a year before that, was sent over by the CIA because you raised the question about uranium from Africa. He says he came back from Niger and said that, in fact, he could not find any documentation that, in fact, Niger had sent uranium to Iraq or engaged in that activity and reported it back to the proper channels. Were you briefed on his findings in February, March of 2002?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: No. I don?t know Joe Wilson. ..... One of the questions I asked at that particular time about this, I said, ?What do we know about this?? They take the question. He came back within a day or two and said, ?This is all we know. There?s a lot we don?t know,? end of statement. And Joe Wilson?I don?t know who sent Joe Wilson. He never submitted a report that I ever saw when he came back.

And we have to just add just one more illustrative claim of Mr. Cheney:

Same on biological weapons?we believe he?d developed the capacity to go mobile with his BW production capability because, again, in reaction to what we had done to him in ?91. We had intelligence reporting before the war that there were at least seven of these mobile labs that he had gone out and acquired. We?ve, since the war, found two of them. They?re in our possession today, mobile biological facilities that can be used to produce anthrax or smallpox or whatever else you wanted to use during the course of developing the capacity for an attack.

That
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
DTB I Believe Kerry said leave Reserves alone. But stop the flow thats going in for 60 to 90 days. He did not say use any of the 660 million barrells alread there. And as for FED gas taxes. There always part of a over all bill in congress. Parts you may or may not Like. But if the bill has more you like in it then you vote for it. I believe the energy Bill Bush is pushing has 8 or 9 cents in it. That bill has some bad stuff in it to. Thats why even with the majority he has in congress. He cant get a vote on it.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top