Scott4USC said:Taoist and SALTY DOG
:nono: :nono: :nono:
In 72 years of SEC football there have been 57 teams that have gone undefeated in conference play. That is an undefeated team per every 1.26 SEC seasons......that happens to be the highest rate of in-conference undefeated teams among all 1A conferences. Go ahead and research it.
So please, don't believe the silly 'MYTH' that the SEC is the toughest conference to run the table in.
Keep calling me names Taost and I will continue to make you look silly. Maybe now I understand your wrath against me!
I don't stoop to the level of calling people names, I express my opinion and back it up. Usually with FACTS! Some people can't handle it.
SEC folks think when SEC teams go undefeated in conference play it's an indication that they are great teams. But when teams go undefeated in other conferences it's an indication of soft competition.
That is good ol' SEC mythology! :mj07:
To give you an idea of how bad the SEC is, check this out. :scared
One of the teams in that conference, Vanderbilt, has NEVER won a conference title, even though they are charter members of the SEC when it was created back in 1933.
In fact, their highest finish in the conference was fourth place back in 1982. :142lmao: That's right, Vanderbilt has NEVER finished in the top three in the SEC in 71 years of being a member.
You have to go all the way back to 1977 to find a conference winner that was not one of the following: Alabama, Auburn, Florida, Georgia, LSU or Tennessee. :lol2
In contrast, these are the schools in the Pac-10 that have won or shared the conference title since 1990: USC, UCLA, Washington St., Washington, Stanford, Oregon, Oregon St. and ASU. Only Cal and Arizona have not won the conference title in that time. Even more amazing is that every single team in the Pac-10 has finished in the top ten in the final AP poll since 1991, :clap: Since Cal finished in the top ten this year, it means that every Pac-10 team will have finished in the top ten in the past 11 years, with seven of these teams having finished in the TOP FIVE during that same period.
No other conference comes close to this accomplishment. So, when an SEC honk comes here and talks about how many bowl representatives the SEC has, know that it's because teams like South Carolina and Vanderbilt have never made it once into the top ten, and that teams like Arkansas (last appeared in top 10 in 1982), Kentucky (1977), Mississippi (1969) and Mississippi St. (1940) rarely provide a challenge for the teams at the top. The top six teams are almost guaranteed wins over the bottom half, and half of the bottom half qualify for bowls because they're bound to win half of their games against the losers at the bottom. Couple that with scheduling of directional state schools, and the SEC qualifies 7-8-9 bowl teams every year. It's not good football; just the magic of scheduling and raw probabilities.
:clap:
These are the facts, and sometimes the truth hurts! Unfortunately for me, facts are usually not enough for the delusional!
taoist said:...you're right, Scott. The PAC-10 is the dominant conference in college football and that's a widely known and undisputed fact....![]()
![]()
taoist said:Main Entry: sar?casm
Pronunciation: 's?r-"ka-z&m
Function: noun
Etymology: French or Late Latin; French sarcasme, from Late Latin sarcasmos, from Greek sarkasmos, from sarkazein to tear flesh, bite the lips in rage, sneer, from sark-, sarx flesh; probably akin to Avestan thwar&s- to cut
1 : a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain <tired of continual sarcasms>
2 a : a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual b : the use or language of sarcasm <this is no time to indulge in sarcasm>
taoist said:...you're right, Scott. The PAC-10 is the dominant conference in college football and that's a widely known and undisputed fact....![]()
![]()
taoist said:...my apologies, scottie.... you're right.... the Pac 10 is the toughest conf to run the table.... :mj07: :mj07:![]()
![]()
...retard.![]()
![]()
taoist said:...no, let me repeat myself.... Scott, you're an asshole!!!
...and once again have proven it to the rest of the forum.![]()
taoist said:...you answered my question about why this forum can't be more like the old hockey forum. It's because of pricks like yourself!!!
taoist said:...hey jerk-off, since when are miami and Oklahoma in the Pu$$y 10?!?!?!?!
taoist said:...sorry, Scott, but it is impossible to "debate" with someone with a closed mind...who is so blind as to reality that he actually thinks that the PAC 10 is anything other than a beefed up mid-major conference running on a constant i.v. of alumni contributions.... :mj17: :mj07:
...and by the way, scooter, I doubt that you'd hold a candle to most of the board when it comes to intelligence. :moon: :jerkit:![]()
I just pray that you don't continue to turn every post in this forum into your own personal PAC 10 soapbox when the season rolls around....![]()
...most of the fine folks in this forum think that you're more dense than a bag of hammers...the rest of them know it.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.