Green Bay Vs Seattle - KOD

theGibber1

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 27, 2001
8,615
64
0
Dallas TX
...............................................................

yeh I know it does to you :SIB

Yes, thank you for proving my point.. You were on the right side of the game congrats..but you cost yourself almost $ 800 dollars with an unnecessary point buy that made no sense??:shrug:
 

Juu3

Registered User
Forum Member
why you still gotta be like that Gibber? this thread started with your negativity and looks like its going to end with it too... ATL made good call and proved once again that he is here to HELP...not saying that you aren't...just sayin

good call ATL...can't say that I saw it going that way but I sure am glad it did!
 

theGibber1

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 27, 2001
8,615
64
0
Dallas TX
Im not sure why he thought i was being mean.. If you look at my first reply i was just trying to help out.. just like everyone here.. i wanted to know the reason.. the point buy was expensive and unnecessary and i wanted to ask his reason for it..

then he attacked me and told me to fawk off and called me names.. then talked more shit in the general forum..

guess there is no place for constructive criticism and thought exchange in this place..

not to mention i was replying to his comment.. so whats the problem?

so ok then ill play ball

Fantastic call scott you were right about needing that -180 buy back Congrats on a huge win? well a win anyway..


sheesh
 

Toledo Prophet

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 5, 2005
2,384
2
0
53
Toledo, Ohio
Scott,

Keep on keeping on my friend. Not sure why people feel the need to question a winning bet. I buy points frequently as well (although I do care about the key numbers, a lot), and while many of times I would have won anyway, I score a lot of wins and a few pushes that would have been losses otherwise. This was the first season where I actively engaged in the buying of points as a regular practice, and I came out way ahead in those games.....i kept personal track because if the losses I took on those games cost enough in juice to take away all or most of the profit, I would stop the practice. But, that was hardly the case. In bowl season, as an example, two losses became pushes as a result.....i would rather tie and lose nothing to the book, than, well, lose to the book....and one Sunday back in October, i went 4-0-1 on NFL games, which had I not bought down points on favorites would have gone 1-3-1. Talk about a reversal.

Anyway, congrats on the win.....ignore the hecklers.

:toast:
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
43,082
2,161
113
On the course!
Scott,

Keep on keeping on my friend. Not sure why people feel the need to question a winning bet. I buy points frequently as well (although I do care about the key numbers, a lot), and while many of times I would have won anyway, I score a lot of wins and a few pushes that would have been losses otherwise. This was the first season where I actively engaged in the buying of points as a regular practice, and I came out way ahead in those games.....i kept personal track because if the losses I took on those games cost enough in juice to take away all or most of the profit, I would stop the practice. But, that was hardly the case. In bowl season, as an example, two losses became pushes as a result.....i would rather tie and lose nothing to the book, than, well, lose to the book....and one Sunday back in October, i went 4-0-1 on NFL games, which had I not bought down points on favorites would have gone 1-3-1. Talk about a reversal.

Anyway, congrats on the win.....ignore the hecklers.

:toast:


It's all well and good when you remember when buying a point saved your butt. There isn't a guy here who hasn't lost MANY games by half a point.

I see both sides of the argument, but at some point........don't you have to quit handing the bookie your wallet?

The idea of this game is to find an edge. In theory.......EVERY GAME you could buy into a winner, couldn't you? Scott could have taken Seattle +23 for maybe -1300? Hey!!! He would have covered! By somes thinking around here......that make that a "good bet", because it won. Still, it's ridiculous to others.

A person has to measure whether, over the course of time, he has made or lost more money doing this. That is the only true test, same as any other gamble.

I don't advocate what Scott does with these bets. The thing is........He doesn't need me to.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
yyz

thats the most intelligent post that I have ever seen at madjacks posted in any betting forum
thread.

I apologize for anything bad I have ever said about you .

When I was watching the game, I was thinking about you sitting in the endzone in the snow in Lambeau. Next Sunday night, please carry a sign so it will be easier for me to spot you. The sign can say KOD !!.

thanks
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
so ok then ill play ball

Fantastic call scott you were right about needing that -180 buy back Congrats on a huge win? well a win anyway..


sheesh
..............................................................

thanks for playing ball.

The thing is that no betters wager the same way. In the course of my posted plays this year I have bet big dogs, little dogs, moneylines, and favorites.

I just get overly pissed when people like edludes would question why I played this or that. He was a classic example of stuck in the mud wagering.
what ever happened to that loser anyway ?
He will probably show up in my Super Bowl thread
to bash me on something.

There is no way to explain to some people a differant way to wager when it goes against what they have done all their lives, or they know to be successful.

The bottom line though is 10-2 and up 32 units.

KOD does not throw up , KOD throws down !
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top