Hilton installs `reloading' Trojans at 3-1 to capture BCS trophy

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
105,251
1,637
113
70
home
I wonder who will chime in here? BTW, Scott, you're trying really hard to annoy people STILL, so please quit with the tiny text. geez! I'm not going to be as flexible with you as I have been in the past because you're really starting to annoy ME now!



Monday, July 12, 2004
Copyright ? Las Vegas Review-Journal

USC early favorite for national title repeat


Hilton installs `reloading' Trojans at 3-1 to capture BCS trophy

By MATT YOUMANS
REVIEW-JOURNAL


With or without star wideout Mike Williams, Southern California is a good bet to again be the team to beat in college football this season.

The Trojans, 3-1 favorites to win the BCS Championship Game on Jan. 4 in the Orange Bowl, are getting more than their share of respect from oddsmakers.

"They have so much talent on that team it's ridiculous," Las Vegas Hilton sports book director Jay Kornegay said.

USC returns quarterback Matt Leinart from the 12-1 team that routed Michigan in the Rose Bowl to claim a share of the national title with Louisiana State. But Williams' status remains uncertain.

Williams compiled 87 receptions for 1,226 yards and 16 touchdowns as a sophomore, then hired an agent and entered the NFL Draft. But a court ruling barred him from the draft, and he has re-enrolled at USC and appealed to the NCAA to have his eligibility restored.

If Williams is reinstated, he will be one of the nation's best players. But either way, his situation won't have much of an impact on the betting numbers, Kornegay said.

The Hilton posted lines Sunday on 80 of the season's top games, in addition to regular-season win totals for 35 teams.

The Trojans play 12 games and their win total has been set at 11. They were also made double-digit favorites in all five of their games posted by the Hilton.

"That team is so solid. There is Leinart and Williams, but it's basically a no-name team. They're getting the top recruits every year and reloading," Kornegay said. "Overall, the Pac-10 is a very weak conference."

Oklahoma (6-1) and Georgia (8-1) are the top national title contenders, with Florida State, LSU and Texas all at 10-1.

Kornegay, who left the Imperial Palace this summer, has made it a tradition to post lines on college games in July. He said his staff studied schedules and rosters for weeks to make solid lines.

"It gets a lot of attention. It's always a pretty popular wager," he said.

The win totals attracted the most action on the first day of betting. Kornegay said significant money came in on seven teams -- Alabama (over 7), Florida (under 8), Maryland (under 7), Missouri (over 8), Oregon (under 7 1/2), Texas A&M (over 6) and UNLV (under 5 1/2). Most teams have 11 games scheduled.

"The Rebels are going to be better than last year, but their schedule is so brutal," Kornegay said, referring to early-season games at Wisconsin and Tennessee.

"The bettors certainly do their homework. Some of the more educated bettors are trying to make money, and others do it for entertainment. If you make a wager, you're going to have action all season."

Among the notable games, UNLV is a 3 1/2-point underdog at Brigham Young on Oct. 8, and USC is a 19-point favorite over Notre Dame on Nov. 27.
 

bbk

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 17, 2003
646
1
0
50
I guess Vegas thinks the PAC 10 Conference is very weak too. Big surprise. It was so nice not have to have Lucas there for a few days; now he is back and nothing has changed. Thanks for the article; I like A&M over 6; best home field advantage in the nation should give them 5 wins alone.
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
Madjack

You talked about me in this thread so I figured to reply inside this thread. I do not understand this quote from you........
please quit with the tiny text.

My text is tiny??? I always thought I was making my text in my post bigger. I highlight all my post, then click size and #1. On my computer it makes my text larger than the normal text here on the site. Is it different for other peoples computers? I thought I was doing everyone favor in making my text larger than normal. On my comp. it is larger than normal. Anybody can answer this question.

Ok Madjack, you said.....
BTW, Scott, you're trying really hard to annoy people STILL, I'm not going to be as flexible with you as I have been in the past because you're really starting to annoy ME now!

WHAT THE HECK DID I DO NOW???? I am starting to annoy YOU? Lets see, I posted a MSU preview, and BOBBYBLUECHIP replied thankyou. I posted pre-season top 25 from CFN. Someone else posted about Purdue winning over 7, I complimented Markh and bobbybluechip on their opinion and then offered another "PICK" to take Tenn. over 8 wins and gave analysis why. (I put $200 on wager and posted why) Markh nicely replied and complimented me. In case you did not know, he was one of the posters who had a beef with me and looks like we patched things up. Then someone posted about CAL under 8 season wins, I replied and agreed with MARKH and offered my opinion. WAR EAGLE replied to my post attacking me for saying that Oregon and CAL are above average teams. I simply replied and told him why I think they are and justified why I think so. Then Trump Tight said no question OU had the #1 recruiting class so the CFN sight might not have credibility. Well I simply replied and told him he was wrong, that USC had the #1 recruiting class and offered links to prove it. From the looks of it, I did not attack anybody or do anything wrong.

Please Madjack, tell me what I am doing that is pissing you off? I don't see it. EVERY SINGLE post of mine was about handicapping and very productive if you ask me. Unless you are getting annoyed with the tiny text which I do not understand because my text is larger on my computer and I thought I was doing everyone a favor.

Anybody else here can chime in exactly what I have done to piss you off. Please let me know. I don't want to piss anybody off. But I need reasons why i piss you off. Thanks.

*Sorry my post was off topic but I was replying to Madjack

"That team is so solid. There is Leinart and Williams, but it's basically a no-name team. They're getting the top recruits every year and reloading," Kornegay said. "Overall, the Pac-10 is a very weak conference."

HA! Guess he projects the Pac 10 to be weak this year. We shall see. Last year the Pac 10 was either the 3rd or 4th toughest conference and it was supposedly a down year for the Pac 10. I would not say that is a weak conference. That comment sure came from left field. Maybe he just looks at top 25 rankings and not see many Pac 10 teams. :) Thanks for the article Madjack.

*NEWS ON USC, USC could be without Lewis (the most talented WR on the team). He may become academically ineligible if he does not pass his summer school classes. So if he is out, and Williams does not get in, USC will be EXTREMELY INEXPERIENCED AT THE WR SPOT. Completely brand new OL and WR corps for the V-Tech game. Take V-Tech +17pts. Way too many pts for to give for breaking in both starting units on the road.

*I did not change the text in this post. Is it better now?
 
Last edited:

Master Capper

Emperior
Forum Member
Jan 12, 2002
9,104
11
0
Dunedin, Florida
I think that Bama number at 7 is right on line as I count 7 wins but at this point I am unsure of Shula's coaching to go out on a limb and say yes they will pull off a upset or thet they will not lose a cheap one! I sort of like that Mizzou over 8, as they should start the season off 5-0 going into the Texas game and still have three home games left plus winnable games at Nebraska and Iowa State!
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top