how many got screwed with Romeo??

shamrock

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 12, 2001
8,312
329
83
Boston, MA
Kicks fg with 3 minutes left on fourth down deep in Pittsburgh Territory. Then doesn't even on side kick??:shrug:
 

bulldog

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 28, 1999
5,334
89
48
deep south
cost me straight up and 4 team parlay if they do not score, but might have scored anyway if he goes for it.
 

ELVIS

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 25, 2002
3,620
1
0
memphis
one of the stupidest decsiions i have ever seen. i had no money on the game, but total idiot move.


if they were playing under better conditions i could understand it, maybe.

however, there was no threat of a deep pass with that wind - he should have went for it to give his team the best chance of winning. imo
 

gjn23

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 20, 2002
9,319
45
48
54
So. Cal
Kicks fg with 3 minutes left on fourth down deep in Pittsburgh Territory. Then doesn't even on side kick??:shrug:

i'd say the 53 guys he coaches got screwed.

total moron, but right behind him are al michales and slobbering john madded who agreed and defended the move......too bad that over 70% of the time the team in that situation (the clowns) wouldnt even see the ball again.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
It was a stupid decision.

Everyone knew they had no chance of getting the ball back except the coach.

:shrug: :shrug:
 

trolln4walii

shorelunchne1
Forum Member
Jul 11, 2004
7,915
39
48
Canadian waters(summertime)
total moron, but right behind him are al michales and slobbering john madded who agreed and defended the move......QUOTE]

Exactly what I was going to say gjn....their weak attempt at trying to justify the stupid decision was even muddled in their futility at grasping for straws. You better go for the td when you're that far down the field. It's plays like this that always get the conspirators going. I'm sure Mr. Vegas Michaels was smiling the whole while during the defense of his 'cover' :mad:
 

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,910
135
63
16
L.A.
Once it was 4th and 7, I think the FG was the right call. There was nearly 4 minutes and all they had to do was stop Pitt. They couldn't stop them. IF THEY DID and got the ball back in decent field position then everyone would be talking about what a good decision it was.

Sour grapes from people who lost their bets.
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Once it was 4th and 7, I think the FG was the right call. There was nearly 4 minutes and all they had to do was stop Pitt. They couldn't stop them. IF THEY DID and got the ball back in decent field position then everyone would be talking about what a good decision it was.

Sour grapes from people who lost their bets.

I won my bet and was trilled with the move. Your spin is like http://homepage.mac.com/rlmorel/.Public/lipstickpig.jpg
 

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,910
135
63
16
L.A.
Look - it all comes down to execution. Cleveland lost because they couldn't execute all night, not because of that one decision by the coach.

If your bet is depending on that decision by the coach, then well ...it's like complaining that you lost a coin flip.

IF Cleveland stopped Pit on the next possession everything would look different. They couldn't execute that so they lost.
 

layinwood

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2001
4,771
40
0
Dallas, TX
Smurphy, I totally disagree with you. I had no money on the game but no matter how you look at it they needed a TD to do anything. Why not take two shots at a TD instead of 1(or just potentially 1)?

Even if they stop Pitt, Pitt then punts and they have to drive the length of the field. I could see kicking the FG if the game had been high scoring, but they had problems all night moving the ball and they where about as close as they could be so why not keep going.
 

Cash Man

The Original
Forum Member
Sep 1, 2007
4,021
15
0
I lost 500 on it and yeah, i think Romeo is either a really bad decision maker or tried to cover the spread. Everybody knows Pitt runs the clock down with ground and pound in final minutes. He didn't even have all his T.O. bad call, dumb move and we got screwed!!:rolleyes:
 

shamrock

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 12, 2001
8,312
329
83
Boston, MA
Once it was 4th and 7, I think the FG was the right call. There was nearly 4 minutes and all they had to do was stop Pitt. They couldn't stop them. IF THEY DID and got the ball back in decent field position then everyone would be talking about what a good decision it was.

Sour grapes from people who lost their bets.

Before chiming in with the sour grapes comment, you should at least make a little sense. First off it wasn't 4 minutes, it was 3:24. Second Cleveland had already burned a timeout, only having 2 left. Third they had only completed 1 pass the entire game over 20 yards, and only 3 over 10 yards.
Fourth as layin wood pointed out, 3 points did nothing, they were still down 4 needing another touchdown anyway.
Further, they wouldn't have got the ball In good field position if they held Pittsburgh,because they pooch kicked the kickoff, and Steelers got the ball on 31 yard line, so any decent punt would have put Cleveland deep in their own territory anyway.
 

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,910
135
63
16
L.A.
Smurphy, I totally disagree with you. I had no money on the game but no matter how you look at it they needed a TD to do anything. Why not take two shots at a TD instead of 1(or just potentially 1)?

Even if they stop Pitt, Pitt then punts and they have to drive the length of the field. I could see kicking the FG if the game had been high scoring, but they had problems all night moving the ball and they where about as close as they could be so why not keep going.

I agree they should have been playing for 4 downs on that drive. But once it was 4th and 7, I have no problem with taking the FG. Again - if they just could have executed on defense, the outcome might have looked a lot different.
 

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,910
135
63
16
L.A.
Before chiming in with the sour grapes comment, you should at least make a little sense. First off it wasn't 4 minutes, it was 3:24. Second Cleveland had already burned a timeout, only having 2 left. Third they had only completed 1 pass the entire game over 20 yards, and only 3 over 10 yards.
Fourth as layin wood pointed out, 3 points did nothing, they were still down 4 needing another touchdown anyway.
Further, they wouldn't have got the ball In good field position if they held Pittsburgh,because they pooch kicked the kickoff, and Steelers got the ball on 31 yard line, so any decent punt would have put Cleveland deep in their own territory anyway.

They shouldn't have pooch kicked. In fact, nobody should ever pooch kick.:nono:
 

ppabart

Not banned
Forum Member
Dec 13, 2000
18,259
150
63
48
Decatur, GA USA
none
What would have happened if all of you were on Cleveland? Would there be a thread on how great Romeo is? Getting "screwed" in the NFL is just the nature of the beast. Kicking the field goal was neither a right nor wrong call. It was just judgment.
 

Woodson

L I V I N
Forum Member
Oct 23, 1999
15,508
79
48
Blockchain
What would have happened if all of you were on Cleveland? Would there be a thread on how great Romeo is? Getting "screwed" in the NFL is just the nature of the beast. Kicking the field goal was neither a right nor wrong call. It was just judgment.

Somebody get a rope....

:00x4
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top