I dont understand how thats not

[Theboundbook]

A TOUCHDOWN... 2 feet down. period.... what the fuck????

 

[Phenom]

not only that but his knee hits and then his torso and then ball comes out. :142smilie call by the refs

 

[Noclue#1]

why even have replay?

why even have replay?

if that is not a catch, come on. and even to be overturned. please

 

[DrRays]

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

REFS DUDE COME ON WE KNOW IT.

 

[LDB]

THE BIGGEST BLOWN CALL IVE EVER SEEN :director:

 

[saint]

I agree! How is it any different then when a player walks the sideline to make a catch and gets both feet down?? It doesn't matter what happens when they come down out of bounds it's still a catch!!

 

[THE_THONG]

:mj07:

ref must have bet the under on first half

 

[bulldog]

how can they not call it a td; replay is bullshit.

 

[airjerd]

THE BIGGEST BLOWN CALL IVE EVER SEEN :director:

I'd say the 11-10 game in pittsburgh when Troy scored was the biggest blown call :shrug: :mj07: :mj1:

 

[ninosaturnino]

I'd say the 11-10 game in pittsburgh when Troy scored was the biggest blown call :shrug: :mj07: :mj1:

i agree...

 

[Theboundbook]

I'd say the 11-10 game in pittsburgh when Troy scored was the biggest blown call :shrug: :mj07: :mj1:

It wasnt a blown call!! It was an overturn of an obvious CORRECT CALL... RIOTING IN OAKLAND IF THEY LOSE!!!!

 

[Wilson]

:nono: The reception rule states that once a receiver gains possession of the ball with two feet inbounds, whether it be in the end zone or the field of play, he must hold onto the ball if he is driven to the ground by an opponent. In the play in question, the receiver hit the ground and the ball moved on his chest, which under current NFL rules, does not constitute a catch.

 

[4lynski]

I'd say the 11-10 game in pittsburgh when Troy scored was the biggest blown call :shrug: :mj07: :mj1:

I say the never forgotten COIN FLIP..

 

[Theboundbook]

:nono: The reception rule states that once a receiver gains possession of the ball with two feet inbounds, whether it be in the end zone or the field of play, he must hold onto the ball if he is driven to the ground by an opponent. In the play in question, the receiver hit the ground and the ball moved on his chest, which under current NFL rules, does not constitute a catch.

Then that makes sense.... But, that would have NEVER been reviewed 2 yrs ago.... ever

 

[rocky mountain]

:nono: The reception rule states that once a receiver gains possession of the ball with two feet inbounds, whether it be in the end zone or the field of play, he must hold onto the ball if he is driven to the ground by an opponent. In the play in question, the receiver hit the ground and the ball moved on his chest, which under current NFL rules, does not constitute a catch.

I hate attorneys!

 

[owtkast3]

:nono: The reception rule states that once a receiver gains possession of the ball with two feet inbounds, whether it be in the end zone or the field of play, he must hold onto the ball if he is driven to the ground by an opponent. In the play in question, the receiver hit the ground and the ball moved on his chest, which under current NFL rules, does not constitute a catch.

Thanks Wilson you beat me to the punch. Unfortuantely for the Raiders it was the correct call.