Jack I have to give you credit. You are alot smarter man than most give you credit for. Its taken me years to finally come up with what you must have been thinking when you opened up this site. And who you figured would be your clientele
Bravo my intelligent friend. Bravo, love the teeth
So? The employees are free to seek employment elsewhere with a better compensation package. I'm sure they would each be happier with a company vehicle as well, but why is this the employer's problem?
I'm just wondering why one of the biggest corporations in the world shouldn't pay health benefits? Instead they counsel their employees how to apply for State benefits (Medicaid) and cost working people tax dollars to cover these individuals.
How much wall stuff do people need anyway :shrug:
Ive had 1 root canal and Im months overdue for another.
Im from Canada not some 3rd world country in Europe.
Lets see. Lets take a mom and pop tire shop that has been in the neighborhood forever. Walmart comes in and sells their tires for a loss knowing they can make the money on other products. The mom and pop shop now goes out of bussiness and the family is a wreck. Walmart see's this shop is finished and raises their tire prices back up. I'll shop somewhere else. Plus tax payers pay a portion of their workers health insurance because they are to greedy to pay it themselves.
So? The employees are free to seek employment elsewhere with a better compensation package. I'm sure they would each be happier with a company vehicle as well, but why is this the employer's problem?
I didn't read the article, but isn't America great. People have the choice to shop at what stores they want, and work at what businesses they so choose. The big gripe people have about Wal-Mart is that they bully their suppliers around. The reply I have to that is, don't supply Wal-Mart if you don't like how they beat you down on prices. Everyone has choices out there to do one thing or another, that's why America is so great.:mj06:
The economist Jason Furman, who worked for Kerry and now Obama, has long utilized this extensive academic literature and learning to defend WalMart against it's luddite critics. He finds it puzzling that progressives and leftists don't celebrate Wal-Mart's many achievements (but understands why!):
"Wal-Mart's critics also paint the company as a parasite on taxpayers, because 5 percent of its workers are on Medicaid. Actually that's a typical level for large retail firms, and the national average for all firms is 4 percent. Moreover, it's ironic that Wal-Mart's enemies, who are mainly progressives, should even raise this issue. In the 1990s progressives argued loudly for the reform that allowed poor Americans to keep Medicaid benefits even if they had a job. Now that this policy is helping workers at Wal-Mart, progressives shouldn't blame the company. Besides, many progressives favor a national health system. In other words, they attack Wal-Mart for having 5 percent of its workers receive health care courtesy of taxpayers when the policy that they support would increase that share to 100 percent."
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.
