Iran is next

TonyTT

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2002
353
1
0
71
Ohio
Master Capper said:
People need to begin to call out just where the terror problems begin and thats Saudi Arabia, that is where 80% of all terrorist that have attacked us have come from and Saudi Arabia is the main financier of terror. Still till this day the Saudi Government allows classes to be taught at the University level that breed hostility towards the west and this becomes ingrained in the psyche of these people.

Master Capper,
Since so many of the terrorists are from Saudi...one would think that the Saudi intell agencies would be slick enough to infiltrate some of these organizaions. Maybe even try to put some of their operatives in leadership postions in some of these subversive organizations.
WAIT A MINUTE.....maybe....just maybe....
THEY HAVE!!!
Those jokers are making a KILLING with the PRICE of oil being as high as it has for the past 4 yrs!!!
TT :rolleyes:
 

JT

Degenerate
Forum Member
Mar 28, 2000
3,592
81
48
60
Ventura, Ca.
Bin Laden could very well be hiding in Pakistan and who is to say he could couldn't access suitcase type nukes there or on the black market if they are out there. Do I like the fact North Korea has them? No. But we don't have the resources to police this stuff on our own. We need help. If we invade Iran to me would just make things just that more unstable and dangerous for us in the utter hatred that it would create for us. To me, that is a BIGGER gamble.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,485
161
63
Bowling Green Ky
Saw documentary on Korean war last night--was very brutal war--was noted at end that when soilders returned there was little fanfare or parades--maybe because cease fire was not considered victory.Wonder what public opinion was back then--haven't seen anyone complaining lately that after 50 years we still having troops there.

Deaths from Korean war 33,741
killed in action with no remains ever found 1,533

Could you imagine the field day the press and others would have with these #'s today?

--and I question that UBL would consider Saudi safe place to hide------

RIYADH (AFP) - The killing of Al-Qaeda's new frontman in Saudi Arabia means that the network's local branch is now "brain dead" after successive killings of hardcore leaders, a prominent Muslim cleric said.

ADVERTISEMENT

But while the group's militants still on the run do not compare to the likes of their notorious slain chief Abdul Aziz al-Muqrin, they remain "dangerous as individuals, rather than as an organization," Sheikh Mohsen al-Awaji told AFP.

The Saudi interior ministry announced Sunday that Moroccan-born Yunis Mohammed Ibrahim al-Hayari, recently named as "the head of sedition" by his comrades, was killed in a shootout with security forces after they stormed a suspected militants' hideout in an eastern neighborhood of Riyadh.

The dawn offensive came barely five days after authorities released a new list of 36 wanted militants, topped by Hayari, who they said were linked to a wave of violence unleashed by suspected Al-Qaeda extremists in May 2003.

Twenty-one on the list were thought to be abroad. One of those has since turned himself in to Saudi authorities. The list was the third of its kind published in the past two years.

Twenty-three of 26 most-wanted militants named on a list published in December 2003 have been confirmed killed or arrested, and one more has reportedly died fighting against US-led forces in Iraq.

"The group which calls itself Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula has been brain dead since the killing of Muqrin, Faisal al-Dakheel and (Yemeni) Khaled bin Haj," said Awaji, a moderate Islamist.

"The others are remnants (of the group)... They are just followers, though they remain dangerous as individuals, rather than as an organization," he said, noting that most of those named on the new list were previously unknown.

Dakheel was shot dead by security forces along with Muqrin and two other comrades in a gunbattle in Riyadh in June 2004 after their group beheaded an American aeronautics engineer who had been taken hostage, culminating a series of attacks which terrorized Western residents of the oil-rich kingdom.

Haj had been gunned down in a March 2004 clash. He was described at the time as Al-Qaeda's head of operations in Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Gulf.

Two more top Al-Qaeda operatives -- Muqrin's purported successor Saud al-Otaibi and the Moroccan mastermind of last year's Madrid train bombings Abdel Karim al-Mejati -- were among 15 militants killed in a three-day gunbattle with security forces last April in Al-Qassim, some 320 kilometers (200 miles) north of Riyadh.

Sheikh Salman al-Odah, another leading moderate Muslim cleric, issued a statement this week exhorting the militants on the new list to renounce violence.

"I address this strong appeal to anyone directly or indirectly involved in violent acts to engage in soul-searching, mend his ways and let reason prevail," Odah wrote.

At the same time, he said, "I call on authorities to open the door to the return (to the right path) by forgiving and demonstrating tolerance to those who (repent) and by being transparent in upholding (their) rights," he said.

Awaji said Odah "spoke for everybody (in the country). Everyone is tired of the violence... which in addition to claiming innocent souls has hindered the introduction of comprehensive reforms, which is a priority for Saudi intellectuals."

A Western source has noted that the names on the new list "seem to be a sort of second-tier terrorists."

The publication of the list suggested that authorities "are not letting down their guard even after getting most of the big ones," the source added.

But Awaji warned that violence in Saudi Arabia could not be totally eradicated "so long as the crisis in Iraq remains so intense."

Several of the militants on the new list are reportedly either fighting in Iraq or have died there
 
Last edited:

TonyTT

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2002
353
1
0
71
Ohio
DOGS THAT BARK said:
--and I question that UBL would consider Saudi safe place to hide-----

DTB,
It certainly wouldn't surprise me much if he were there. I'd trust that Saudi govt about as much as I'd trust that notorious Pakistani ISI.
It isn't too hard for me to imagine the upper echelon of Al-Qaeda itself being comprised of Saudi govt officials and or Pakistani ISI agents.
What better way to control the militants than to CONTROL the militants. That scenario certainly isn't too far fetched when you consider so much at stake. By the way...wasn't the Pakistani ISI instrumental in setting up the taliban in Afghanistan in the first place?
TT
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
if we had today`s media back during ww2 and korea,we`d be speaking some asian language right now....

the stuff that went on in those wars in the pacific were brutal and unforgiving....

we were flame-throwering enenmy soldiers that were hiding in tunnels....we had to...

"captured japanese were dead to their families......the soldier`s name was cancelled from the register of birth.......a remark in his soldiers book: " take this advice, will you be captured by the enemy, you will not only dishonour the army, but also your parents and family until they will not be able any more to get upright.....therefore, always preserve the last bullet for yourself ".....

it`s no surprise that we chose to bomb their cities...rather send our own soldiers to slaughter...

now we fight a similar fanatical enemy......

and the media....imagine if this media were around when the choice as to whether or not to drop the bomb on japan was made...

if they were,many of us who had fathers that served would not be sitting at our keyboards....we wouldn`t be here...because our fathers and grandfathers would have died...
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
gardenweasel said:
..imagine if this media were around when the choice as to whether or not to drop the bomb on japan was made...

if they were,many of us who had fathers that served would not be sitting at our keyboards....we wouldn`t be here...because our fathers and grandfathers would have died...
................................................................

gw

thats the most intelligent thing I think you have
ever said.
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
The problem is not the press reporting events. It is the type of war we are fighting. Bush is trying to win the hearts and minds of our enemies. So every time we drop a bomb and kill someone we have to apologize. We can't mistreat their holy book so he apologizes. We can't humiliate them so he apologizes. We are not fighting this war like it was WWII so your analogy makes no sense.
 

Master Capper

Emperior
Forum Member
Jan 12, 2002
9,104
11
0
Dunedin, Florida
I have no doubts in my mind that Osama would find safe refuge in Saudi Arabia, I would not put it past the Saudi Government to aid and abet Osama. To try and pretend that the Saudi Government is now a great enforcer against terrorist activites is a farce! At this point the Saudi Government is refusing to allow the United Nations into the country to test for nukes, they state they have none and that weapons inspectors are not needed as their word should be good enough. Now tell me whats the difference between Saudi stonewalling and Iran, except for the fact that no known terrorist have come from Iran or Iraq whereas the vast amount of terrorist that have attacked U.S. interest have come from Saudi Arabia.
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
Once comparisons to ww2 and Korea come up in a post, it's hard to treat anything subsequent in said post with any credibility or interest.

It's weird how certain elements choose to compare this with those two wars, and they are sooooooooooo far from being comparable, it's not even funny.

Once again, a more proper comparison would be USSR/Afhganistan and to a much lesser extent (but still MUCH more applicable than WW2 or Korea), Vietnam.

WW2- Hitler rampaging across Europe and Japan bombs our homeland.

Korea- N. Korea invades an ally that we had promised to protect and intends to turn the peninsula all communist.

Gulf War 2- Ummmm, 12 years prior, Iraq invaded Kuwait? Iraq had no military, no nothing. Was sitting there isolated and toothless. Had nothing to do with the other major attack on homeland.

Yeah, that's comparable.

Just keep blaming the media, though.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
after several years on the forums,i still can`t tell when scott`s zinging me or complimenting me....

lol....

i`ll take that as a compliment,scotty... :)
 

ELVIS

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 25, 2002
3,620
1
0
memphis
sad. these wars will eventually bankrupt our country. as well as many other things. i am conservative, but i hate the war. the $$ is being spent is awful - and what have we accomplished? i would rather the $$ be spent on our borders and missile defense. the western port is backed up and teh southern border is a sieve..... sorry, just my feelings.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,485
161
63
Bowling Green Ky
I see lots of comparisons between Korean war and this war, Matt.

I do agree with you that there are more similarities with Vietnam War though.

The ones that strike me most especially after watching all the war documentaries over the 4th--is the hardships--courage that soilders put forth in war atmosphere--and compare it to courage it takes for those who hide behind fences and shout and spit at them when they return--and the medias portrayal of same.

If you want to boost troop moral let em have tens minutes in the ring with these protestors and press writers/military bashers when they return ;)
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
DOGS THAT BARK said:
I see lots of comparisons between Korean war and this war, Matt.

I do agree with you that there are more similarities with Vietnam War though.

The ones that strike me most especially after watching all the war documentaries over the 4th--is the hardships--courage that soilders put forth in war atmosphere--and compare it to courage it takes for those who hide behind fences and shout and spit at them when they return--and the medias portrayal of same.

Lots of comparisons to the Korean War? I can't wait to hear them.

Also, you're just a little off base on any comparisons to Vietnam. There aren't that many to begin with, but protesters shouting and spitting at returning troops certainly aren't among them. Where do you come up with this stuff? Seriously.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top