Lance Armstrong

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,612
255
83
"the bunker"
Fair point but 11 people? No way. Maybe one or two.


the fact that ALL 11 turned is what seems suspicious to me...

i`d wager that a very,very large percentage of guys at that level of the cycling world take peds....

that said,don`t you wonder what it takes for 11 guys to turn on a teammate?...whether he doped or not,you have to wonder what was threatened or offered..... you have to wonder why,if these guys didn`t have skin in the game,that they all turned on armstrong...and how would they all know if they weren`t complicit?....that`s not something you do in the presence of someone who doesn`t have involvement..if they turned to save their asses,that makes the whole thing ????......which again leads you to believe that they were threatened or offered something...if they were all clean,you`d think that at least one guy would have some semblance of honor....are they all just honorless back stabbers?...


the whole thing stinks to high heaven....
 

Hashish

Smoked
Forum Member
Sep 5, 2006
8,085
107
0
Surf City
I wonder if there are any clowns out there who still think Lance was the most successful cyclist in the history of the world's dirtiest sport without doping. How these one-nut huggers could continue to defend him for so long simply beggars belief.
 

Hashish

Smoked
Forum Member
Sep 5, 2006
8,085
107
0
Surf City
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sport...s-livestrong-cancer-fighting-charity/1638341/

Nike and RadioShack announced Wednesday they have cut ties with Lance Armstrong after massive evidence was released last week that said he used banned drugs and blood transfusions to gain an advantage throughout his cycling career.

Nike also said it will take his name off the Lance Armstrong Fitness Center at its world headquarters. RadioShack acknowledged on Wednesday it had ended a sponsorship deal it signed with Armstrong in July 2009, but declined to disclose when the decision was made.

Both companies issued statements the same morning that Armstrong announced he was stepping down as chairman of his cancer-fighting charity, the Livestrong foundation, to "spare the foundation any negative effects as a result of controversy surrounding my cycling career."

Pedaling on: Amid doping controversy, Livestrong continues

Livestrong CEO Doug Ulman told USA TODAY Sports Wednesday that to his knowledge the decision by Nike was "totally unrelated" to Armstrong's decision to step down as Livestrong chairman. Ulman said Armstrong informed him of his decision to step down as chairman on Monday and that he notified the foundation's board Tuesday night.

"He just made it clear that foundation was his first and foremost priority aside from his family and that he did not want to ever harm our work in any way," Ulman said. "He just said he wanted the best thing possible for the foundation."

Ulman said Armstrong still will participate in the foundation's events, including this weekend when it celebrates its 15th anniversary in Austin, Texas. Ulman called it a "governance decision" by Armstrong to help the foundation avoid distractions involving doping allegations against him. Livestrong said Armstrong's term as founding director has no expiration.

"My family and I have devoted our lives to the work of the foundation and that will not change," Armstrong's statement said. "We plan to continue our service to the foundation and the cancer community. We will remain active advocates for cancer survivors and engaged supporters of the fight against cancer. And we look forward to an exciting weekend of activities marking the 15th anniversary of the foundation's creation."

Jeff Garvey, Livestrong's vice chairman, will replace Armstrong as chairman.

The moves come one week after the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency released more than 1,000 pages of evidence against Armstrong, including 26 sworn statements from witnesses, 11 of whom were Armstrong's teammates.

"Due to the seemingly insurmountable evidence that Lance Armstrong participated in doping and misled Nike for more than a decade, it is with great sadness that we have terminated our contract with him," Nike said in a statement. "Nike does not condone the use of illegal performance enhancing drugs in any manner."

RadioShack issued a statement Wednesday that said it has "no current obligations with Lance Armstrong. Concerning the Foundation, we continue to be proud of what we've accomplished with our customers in generating more than $16 million to date in the fight against cancer."

RadioShack declined to disclose the terms of its deal with Armstrong, including the end date.

Armstrong has denied doping accusations but declined to fight USADA's charges against him in an arbitration hearing, saying the process was a "witch hunt" against him. He said he never failed a drug test, but USADA's evidence contained several witness statements about how he and his teammates used sophisticated methods to avoid testing positive in those tests.

In August, USADA banned him for life and stripped him of his seven titles in the Tour de France after he declined to fight the charges in arbitration. Nike said it plans to "continue support of the Livestrong initiatives created to unite, inspire and empower people affected by cancer."

Formally named the Lance Armstrong Foundation, Livestrong was founded in 1997 after Armstrong was diagnosed with testicular cancer in 1996.

Nike developed Livestrong's iconic yellow silicone wristbands, made in China and a ubiquitous symbol of the foundation's mission to help cancer survivors. Since 2004, more than 80 million wristbands have been distributed worldwide. Ulman said LIvestrong has a contract with a manufacturer in China to produce the bracelets and has a partnership with Nike for the company's "Swoosh" logo to appear on the packaging. He said that relationship will not be affected. Nike notified Ulman of its decision Tuesday night.

Armstrong's statement said Livestrong and its supporters "are incredibly dear to my heart."

"I have had the great honor of serving as this foundation's chairman for the last five years and its mission and success are my top priorities," the statement said. "Today therefore, to spare the foundation any negative effects as a result of controversy surrounding my cycling career, I will conclude my chairmanship."

Since Aug. 23, when Armstrong announced he would not fight USADA's charges, Ulman said Livestrong donations are up about 8 percent from the same period in 2011, up to about $3.4 million. The number of individual donations are down about 3 percent over the same period, Ulman said.

Since the evidence was released last week, Ulman said Armstrong had hinted at the possibility of stepping down as chairman.

"He asked for opinions of various people and came to the conclusion that until things settle down, it was more important to put the mission first," Ulman said.
 

Mr. Poon

Sugar?
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2006
13,160
209
0
Colorado
because Nike is the most righteous and ethical company out there. :rolleyes:

Nike wanted to look impressive out of this. Discontinue their relationship with Lance but continue to support Livestrong. I?m sure they told Lance, if you are running Livestrong, we will stop that too. So Lance stepped down, no brainer.

Good for Nike. Why do they need to sponsor Lance anymore anyway since he isn?t racing competitively. They got their marketing worth out of him when he was in his prime, he is of no benefit to them now. So go ahead, and put out a press release stating how you are on such a high horse condemning Lance?s actions.

However, most of us are still waiting for Nike?s press release condemning their founder and CEO?s regrettable backing of Joe Paterno.

And if I'm going to hug a nut, might as well be one that is of diabolical strength like Lance?s.
 

Mr. Poon

Sugar?
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2006
13,160
209
0
Colorado
has Nike ever renounced the baseball juicers they sponsored? McGwire, Bonds, A-Rod?

Mike Vick? Tiger Woods? Roethilisberger? Kobe? Still sponsored.

It's a business decision for them.

But kudos for them for kicking Lance to the curb.
 

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,937
737
113
50
TX
has Nike ever renounced the baseball juicers they sponsored? McGwire, Bonds, A-Rod?

Mike Vick? Tiger Woods? Roethilisberger? Kobe? Still sponsored.

It's a business decision for them.

But kudos for them for kicking Lance to the curb.

just wondering, why is Tiger Woods in the same group as the rapists and dog killer? :shrug:
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,612
255
83
"the bunker"
What the fuck is your problem? Why are you making shit up to discredit someone you have never met? Do you really need to hug Lance's nut that much? For your information, many bloggers are considered experts. The author is an editor at a respected media outlet, and the blog is at that outlet.

I respect Lance for what he did. It takes incredible ability to bounce back from cancer and dominate one of the toughest athletic events in the world for seven years like he did.

His work to raise money for cancer research is even more admirable.

I would respect him a lot more if he would man up and admit he cheated. The sad fact is that cheating by doping is less and less of a disgraceful act with every athlete that gets caught. He should show some backbone and take his medicine if he really wants to move on with his life like he claims.

"supposed stains of the past" :lol:

it always amazes me how the ones in this thread (and in the public at large)that seem to revel in the downfall of american icons are always the farthest left wing.....the hardcore ......

it must be in their dna...

btw...what was your moniker in here before you became "jedi survivor"?....i`m sure you sound familiar...
 
Last edited:

Mr. Poon

Sugar?
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2006
13,160
209
0
Colorado
And the UCI has dropped Lance's titles, acting quickly like they said they would when they finally received the USADA's report. Interesting they are just leaving those years absent as opposed to promoting the #2 finisher as they did in '06 and '10.

Bruyneel's arbitration case will be interesting and probably one of the last chapters in this saga.

http://espn.go.com/olympics/cycling...strip-lance-armstrong-7-tour-de-france-titles
 

Mr. Poon

Sugar?
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2006
13,160
209
0
Colorado
So Lance 100% used PED's. No doubt about it?

Tough to argue against it. Prior statements made by the UCI made it seem that if there was one thing wrong with the USADA report, they would challenge that ruling. Without a truly positive drug test or Armstrong admission, hard to say it is 100%.

Would still be interested to see the full list of suspensions the USADA handed down to the cyclists that testified against Armstrong, especially the active ones.
 

saint

Go Heels
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
9,501
140
63
Balls Deep
so, who's next ? Carl Lewis ? Usain Bolt ?


:confused:

Spud Webb. No way that midget could dunk without PEDs.
1986-spud-webb.jpg
 

saint

Go Heels
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
9,501
140
63
Balls Deep
So he admits he doped. Shocker- Almost as shocking as the people out there who believed he was being framed
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top