In that case, sorry to hear about her father. But in regards to Lang, where do you guys get all of his picks? I know he charges for his so-called service. Do some of you actually pay for his services, then fade his picks? If you get his picks for free, where could I find them? From what I've read about this guy, it seems you should fade all of his plays EXCEPT his Superbowl play...
Lang has biggest play of year on Florida
- Thread starter BasketballNut
- Start date
In that case, sorry to hear about her father. But in regards to Lang, where do you guys get all of his picks? I know he charges for his so-called service. Do some of you actually pay for his services, then fade his picks? If you get his picks for free, where could I find them? From what I've read about this guy, it seems you should fade all of his plays EXCEPT his Superbowl play...
yeah, when i was fading him I typed fade brandon lang into google and about 10 forumsn came up.. they have whole forumns devoted to fading him.. i forget which one now, but that's what I did....:toast:
Trampled...
Trampled...
Fading shitty cappers is essentially the same concept as tailing good ones. A guy like Lang isn't throwing darts, he's putting time and effort into his work, but is simply a proven loser. He is good at being on the wrong side. If he honestly started flipping coins, then yeah, the EV is the same -110 juice that everyone else is getting on a 50/50 shot in the dark, but he is a well documented loser... the same way some great cappers are documented winners. Tailing the plays and money management concepts of said winners yields a profit. History has evidenced that fading and managing your bankroll in the exact inverse of a guy like Lang... also yields a profit. It comes down to whether you believe a bad capper (i.e. Lang) is really just guessing, or if he's really spending time analyzing and making wrong decisions. :toast:
Trampled...
Fading shitty cappers is essentially the same concept as tailing good ones. A guy like Lang isn't throwing darts, he's putting time and effort into his work, but is simply a proven loser. He is good at being on the wrong side. If he honestly started flipping coins, then yeah, the EV is the same -110 juice that everyone else is getting on a 50/50 shot in the dark, but he is a well documented loser... the same way some great cappers are documented winners. Tailing the plays and money management concepts of said winners yields a profit. History has evidenced that fading and managing your bankroll in the exact inverse of a guy like Lang... also yields a profit. It comes down to whether you believe a bad capper (i.e. Lang) is really just guessing, or if he's really spending time analyzing and making wrong decisions. :toast:
Last nite, Lang had a '15 DIME' play on Creighton +. He also had a "free play" on Santa Clara + Those would have made you feel tingly all over. :scared
Nothing yet today. Will put it here if I see it.
Nothing yet today. Will put it here if I see it.
- Feb 26, 2001
- 13,593
- 164
- 63
You can kid yourself all you want but over thousands of plays, if you have no skill you will settle in at the 50% mark.
- Feb 26, 2001
- 13,593
- 164
- 63
It doesn't matter what his method is. If you have no skill, you will settle in at the 50% mark over enough time.
Sorry. The site I find him had nothing tonite. Maybe he was run over by a fan while dining in a restaurant. :142smilie
You can kid YOURSELF.....but you can have all the fucking skill in the world, and it still comes out the same.
- Feb 26, 2001
- 13,593
- 164
- 63
- Feb 26, 2001
- 13,593
- 164
- 63
If it's possible for somebody to hit 55%, then it's also possible for somebody to hit 45%. Enough said.
- Feb 26, 2001
- 13,593
- 164
- 63
Not when the 55% is based on a talent or statistical analysis. When you suck, you are basically flipping a coin. Why is that so hard for some of you to understand? JFC
so everybody that has ever gambled for a long period of time is no worse than 50% :142smilie :142smilie
I'll bet every cent i have that is not the case
I'll bet every cent i have that is not the case
- Feb 26, 2001
- 13,593
- 164
- 63
There is a reason we pay juice you know. If you lowered it to 49.5% or so you would lose every cent you have with just a few thousand plays.
