Weasel you are right. Of course people making judgments based on other seasons is even more absurd. If you look at the body of work, what are the "negatives" - if there can be such a thing - of these undefeated teams?
USC
- thoroughly outplyed in squeaking out a home win against Cal (Cal that beat one ranked team this year);
had to comeback furiously then hold off a woeful Stanford team;
a tainted win over what at the time looked like a weak VT team but looks much better now;
a less than impressive to say the least win today against a bad UCLA team - and some more beneficial officiating miscues;
could throw in some other bones I guess, such as dreadful first halves against Arizona, Washington, and Oregon State - even ND
OU
less impresssive non-conference wins than USC
held on at Okie State and AM - but a pair of 7 win teams in tough places to play;
defense not as good early in the year;
a down Big 12 as a whole , but an up south division (north wins were Kansas, Kansas Stae, and Nebraska, and now Colorado - not too impressive to say the least)
Auburn
very weak non-conference schedule;
a 1 point win at home v LSU (people are really stretching with this one)
they only beat Tenn by 10 on a neutral field in a rematch game (are people reallya rguing this too???)
I would argue, although some would disagree, that as good as SEC is that Auburn skated pretty lucky this year - Miss and Miss State, Ark at home, Bama with a scrub QB (although still a tough palce to play, tougher than anywhere USC or OU played); the tough games, LSU and Georgia were at home;
On the other side:
Each won every game of course. Auburn actually played and beat more ranked teams. If you look at quality wins how isnt Auburn one of the top 2 - LSU, Georgia, Tenn twice? USC has VaTech and Cal; Ou really only has Texas.
We can all debate who really belongs, but the fact is that far and away the primary reason it will be USC and OU isnt some objective criteria, but rahter that is who started the year 1-2. Think about this _ if the first poll was October 10, the day after OU shut out texas and USC barely beat Cal, and right after Auburn had beaten LSU and Tenn in Knoxville, does anyone really think USC would have been anywhere but #3? Not saying it would be just, but thats how it would have been, and tonight the same pundits still supporting USC but ragging Auburn would have had the same stories but for the other teams.