Not yet.Chalk it up to aging I guess. Have you contacted the Place For Mom people?
Heading out in an hour for my 2nd round of the year. Looks like cloudy low 60’s for the round.
MadJack's Sportsbar
- Thread starter MadJack
- Start date
Heading out in an hour for my 2nd round of the year. Looks like cloudy low 60’s for the round.
- Mar 19, 2006
- 38,724
- 606
- 113
- 75
Way jelly here…Not yet.
Heading out in an hour for my 2nd round of the year. Looks like cloudy low 60’s for the round.
73 and no wind here today, but we had 6 inches of snow Monday so the course isn’t open. There are a few in the area that are, but I’m not going to play today. Golf cart is filthy from last season, so it’s gonna get a cleaning.
I'm in luck. They haven't closed this dive yet. Hangin' out back scouting for toys.
Day #2. Just coffee. Spice things up with some Candyland ("sativa"; B+).
Day #2. Just coffee. Spice things up with some Candyland ("sativa"; B+).
Looks different on my eyes.
I put too much thought into these. Also had a mishap trying to change a pipe screen, but I'll save it for the pearly gates.
Wasn't fair on the Candyland. A-
bowl #2
I put too much thought into these. Also had a mishap trying to change a pipe screen, but I'll save it for the pearly gates.
Wasn't fair on the Candyland. A-
bowl #2
Seven to nine thousand dollars, per month, to keep us Canadians locked up in their incapable prisons, and the fuckers running Maplehurst can't even get the electricity working. I saw a video unless hallucinating.
www.facebook.com
Toronto Culture
Ontario’s overcrowded Maplehurst jail has been without power for a full week — leaving inmates with no heat, cold food, and limited access to basic services. The Milton facility, already known as one...
www.facebook.com
Waiting for a phone call. Or at least football season.
This last is final 4 tracks off this killer instrumental disc from Spain. Just two guitars, bass and drums. Heard some people call it post-rock; some people do shitty drugs. Auto-generated from youtube reverses track 5 and closer-track 8, for some reason. Ends the disc on a chiller note so wtf.
Had a hard time convincing google than Medussa was wheat with two snakes.
New CD coming out in April.
doomed-nation.com
Their first two releases--2014 & '16--are still name your own freedom at bandcamp.
AI Overview
"Spelled" and "spelt" are both correct past tense forms of "spell,"
with usage largely determined by region. Spelled is standard in American English, while both spelt and spelled are acceptable in British English. "Spelt" also refers to a type of wheat.
This last is final 4 tracks off this killer instrumental disc from Spain. Just two guitars, bass and drums. Heard some people call it post-rock; some people do shitty drugs. Auto-generated from youtube reverses track 5 and closer-track 8, for some reason. Ends the disc on a chiller note so wtf.
Had a hard time convincing google than Medussa was wheat with two snakes.
New CD coming out in April.
Spanish instrumental post-rockers Medussa to release new full-length album »Mueran las Ideas« on April 18th!
Santander, Spain based instrumental post-rockers Medussa are gearing up to release their new full-length album »Mueran las Ideas« on April 18th, 2026 via Discos Macarras Records, Conspiración de Iguales, Four Skulls, Muerte Matar Records, Primitive
doomed-nation.com
Their first two releases--2014 & '16--are still name your own freedom at bandcamp.
AI Overview
"Spelled" and "spelt" are both correct past tense forms of "spell,"
with usage largely determined by region. Spelled is standard in American English, while both spelt and spelled are acceptable in British English. "Spelt" also refers to a type of wheat.
Last edited:
Spreading the wealth, my ass.
#9 somehow.
Yes, tequila. Pineapple nothing available, pretty sure. Pink Bubba is an indica, just for laughs.
#9 somehow.
Yes, tequila. Pineapple nothing available, pretty sure. Pink Bubba is an indica, just for laughs.
Politics ruins everything. Money ruins everything.
A sense of humor is beneficial. Beyond comprehension.
#billion if I can include cigarettezzz
A sense of humor is beneficial. Beyond comprehension.
#billion if I can include cigarettezzz
Did I mention Blue Jays 1-0? Home opener shit-kicking of the lowly wherever A's, some 3-2. W is W. T-161.
Hey, what it is.
Don't name your kids Hamlet.
#4
puff #1 imminent
Pretty sure 5 is my limit. Embeddytime, not drinks.
Don't name your kids Hamlet.
#4
puff #1 imminent
Pretty sure 5 is my limit. Embeddytime, not drinks.
Last edited:
Is family law equally as adversarial and lawyer-bloating as it is in Canada?
Just some Pineapple Express, which I almost forgot I had, silly me. Herb not always best for short-term ... whatever I was talking about.
Recent excursions into hell. Changed my mind, need a fattie, Cannalope Hope is exquisite.
ex: how can a court order child support when the father is not allowed to visit with his children?
AI Overview
A court can order child support regardless of visitation
because, in Canadian law, child support is a legal obligation to the child, distinct from parenting time (access). The duty to support a child financially exists independently of whether the father sees them, and one parent cannot refuse access simply because support is unpaid, nor vice versa.
Key Principles:
===
1-0 with that over, though wish that score was reversed; bullpen headaches. Jays 3-1 and Yankees currently down 1-0 @Mariners. Holds and magic number down to 150-something.
Just some Pineapple Express, which I almost forgot I had, silly me. Herb not always best for short-term ... whatever I was talking about.
Recent excursions into hell. Changed my mind, need a fattie, Cannalope Hope is exquisite.
ex: how can a court order child support when the father is not allowed to visit with his children?
AI Overview
A court can order child support regardless of visitation
because, in Canadian law, child support is a legal obligation to the child, distinct from parenting time (access). The duty to support a child financially exists independently of whether the father sees them, and one parent cannot refuse access simply because support is unpaid, nor vice versa.
Key Principles:
- Best Interests of the Child: The court's primary focus is the child's financial well-being, which is seen as a separate issue from the father's access to the children.
- Separation of Issues: Legal experts, as outlined by Gene C. Colman Family Law Centre, emphasize that support is about meeting the child's needs, while visitation is about the relationship.
- Enforcement: Support payments can be enforced through the Family Responsibility Office (FRO) in Ontario, which does not get involved in custody or access issues, as noted by the Ontario government.
- Address Access Independently: If the father is being unfairly denied access, he must go back to court to enforce the parenting order or seek a new order, rather than stopping support payments.
- Seek Changes: If visitation is restricted due to safety issues, the father may still be obligated to pay, though he can ask a judge to review the situation based on any change in circumstances (e.g., if he is now able to provide safe, supervised access).
- Undue Hardship: If the restriction on access has caused high expenses (e.g., in traveling for supervised visits), the father might argue for a change in child support based on "undue hardship," according to the Department of Justice Canada.
===
1-0 with that over, though wish that score was reversed; bullpen headaches. Jays 3-1 and Yankees currently down 1-0 @Mariners. Holds and magic number down to 150-something.
Given several trillion years, we will get to utopia.
Bet?
ex: is it not a crime for one parent to slander another parent on visits, once separated?
(I could have worded that better, but Artie got the drift)
AI Overview
Yes, for a separated parent to slander, disparage, or “badmouth” the other parent to or in front of the children is not only generally considered a form of psychological abuse known as
parental alienation, but it can also be a contempt of court if a non-disparagement clause exists in a parenting order.
While it might not always be treated as a criminal offence in the same way as physical assault, courts take this behavior very seriously and it can lead to severe legal and custody consequences.
Legal and Family Court Consequences
Family courts, such as in Ontario, view malicious badmouthing as a harmful behavior that violates the "best interests of the child" standard.
When Slander Becomes Criminal
Certain actions taken during this process may cross into criminal activity:
Examples of Prohibited Behaviour
Courts often issue orders prohibiting the following, which are considered parental misconduct:
If this is happening, experts recommend:
“It’s not just about what they say, it’s that they use the child to manipulate and turn them against you. It really is a form of emotional abuse and it’s meant to break that parent-child bond.”
Parental Alienation In Ontario: Know Your Legal Rights
“I honestly didn't realize that the things my ex was saying to our daughter during drop-offs were technically 'parental alienation' until our lawyer pointed out all the examples of 'badmouthing' I had logged.”
How Canadian Family Law Defines Parental Alienation
“You have to document the times they are doing this in front of the kids and also the false accusations they are telling them. The courts really do take this seriously.”
Parental Alienation in Ontario: What It Means, Signs to Watch ...
===
This was appreciated during a left jab recently.
Why can you never trust atoms?
Because they make up everything.
Bet?
ex: is it not a crime for one parent to slander another parent on visits, once separated?
(I could have worded that better, but Artie got the drift)
AI Overview
Yes, for a separated parent to slander, disparage, or “badmouth” the other parent to or in front of the children is not only generally considered a form of psychological abuse known as
parental alienation, but it can also be a contempt of court if a non-disparagement clause exists in a parenting order.
While it might not always be treated as a criminal offence in the same way as physical assault, courts take this behavior very seriously and it can lead to severe legal and custody consequences.
Legal and Family Court Consequences
Family courts, such as in Ontario, view malicious badmouthing as a harmful behavior that violates the "best interests of the child" standard.
- Contempt of Court: Violating a non-disparagement clause in a court order can lead to contempt charges, resulting in fines, or in extreme cases, imprisonment.
- Loss of Custody: Continued alienation can lead to a court ordering a reversal of custody, giving the target parent primary decision-making responsibility, or shifting to supervised visitation for the alienating parent.
- Civil Protection Orders: If the slander escalates into harassment (e.g., calling the other parent's workplace or sending threats), it may result in a civil protection order (restraining order).
When Slander Becomes Criminal
Certain actions taken during this process may cross into criminal activity:
- False Allegations of Abuse: If one parent knowingly lies to police or child protection services (CAS) about abuse during visits, they may be committing perjury or mischief, which are criminal offences.
- Obstruction of Justice: Manipulating a child to make false statements about the other parent to authorities can be treated as obstruction of justice.
Examples of Prohibited Behaviour
Courts often issue orders prohibiting the following, which are considered parental misconduct:
- Calling the other parent names or using derogatory language in front of the child.
- Sharing inappropriate details about the separation or court cases with children.
- Preventing or disrupting contact, such as phone calls or scheduled visits.
- Using children as messengers, spies, or pawns in disputes.
If this is happening, experts recommend:
- Documenting Everything: Keeping a log of when the disparagement occurred, what was said, and witnesses present.
- Seeking Legal Advice: Contacting a family lawyer to enforce or update a parenting order to include a non-disparagement clause.
- Counseling: Arranging therapy for the child to help them manage the stress of parental conflict.
“It’s not just about what they say, it’s that they use the child to manipulate and turn them against you. It really is a form of emotional abuse and it’s meant to break that parent-child bond.”
Parental Alienation In Ontario: Know Your Legal Rights
“I honestly didn't realize that the things my ex was saying to our daughter during drop-offs were technically 'parental alienation' until our lawyer pointed out all the examples of 'badmouthing' I had logged.”
How Canadian Family Law Defines Parental Alienation
“You have to document the times they are doing this in front of the kids and also the false accusations they are telling them. The courts really do take this seriously.”
Parental Alienation in Ontario: What It Means, Signs to Watch ...
===
This was appreciated during a left jab recently.
Why can you never trust atoms?
Because they make up everything.
Last edited:
March has been strange and almost endless.
ex: what is a non-disparagement clause in a court order?
AI Overview
A non-disparagement clause in a court order is a legally binding provision that prohibits parties involved (often in family or employment disputes) from making negative, defamatory, or derogatory remarks about each other. It ensures parties do not publicly or privately damage each other's reputation, professional standing, or relationship with children
Key Details of Court-Ordered Non-Disparagement:
Gettin' my money's worth. Rogers tools are gauging me.
ex: what is a non-disparagement clause in a court order?
AI Overview
A non-disparagement clause in a court order is a legally binding provision that prohibits parties involved (often in family or employment disputes) from making negative, defamatory, or derogatory remarks about each other. It ensures parties do not publicly or privately damage each other's reputation, professional standing, or relationship with children
Key Details of Court-Ordered Non-Disparagement:
- Family Law Context: These are common in high-conflict custody cases to prevent parents from speaking poorly of each other in front of, or within earshot of, children.
- Scope: Typically covers oral, written, and online communication (social media), often prohibiting parties from encouraging others to make negative comments.
- Consequences: Violation of a court order is contempt of court, which can lead to fines, jail time, or unfavorable modifications to custody or financial agreements.
- Scope & Limitations: Unlike defamation, which only covers false statements, non-disparagement can prohibit true statements if they are damaging. However, some jurisdictions limit these clauses from restricting truthful information about working conditions.
Gettin' my money's worth. Rogers tools are gauging me.
