I am just curious on what the rationalization is in backing Miami going into this game? Assuming Wade play, but is no more than 50% - 60% affectivel, how can Miami win this game?
Everygame that Miami has won has been close (expect the collapse of game 5). All those games were with a healthy Wade, where he was, by far, their best player on either team. Watching game 6, Miami had no flow on offense, they really looked lost out on the court. They had no one that could drive and dish or draw the double team. They had trouble getting the ball to Shaq, who Detroit was able to double team when they wanted too
I am not trying to question anyone's decision I am just to understand the thought process.
It seemed to me, the ref's let them play in game 6, I think they will do the same for game 7.
Everygame that Miami has won has been close (expect the collapse of game 5). All those games were with a healthy Wade, where he was, by far, their best player on either team. Watching game 6, Miami had no flow on offense, they really looked lost out on the court. They had no one that could drive and dish or draw the double team. They had trouble getting the ball to Shaq, who Detroit was able to double team when they wanted too
I am not trying to question anyone's decision I am just to understand the thought process.
It seemed to me, the ref's let them play in game 6, I think they will do the same for game 7.