Miserable Monday - Philly
- Thread starter Jimboski
- Start date
i was not sure of 1 or 1 a, would have put it in w/the others .. que sera sera, if i played it'd been 10-9-8 in that order
Played it right for a change; finish was 3+5+4/7
Zack paid $52 and change. Place on the 5 was $11.60.
Couldn't really separate the picks before the race.
The 3/5/4 Tri only paid $136.
Thanks for the answer HM, I'll see if I can post a looker with at least 2 mins. to post. Lookers are just as good as handicapped hosses.. USUALLY.
If you wanna know the method I used to separate/bet them let me know.
Zack paid $52 and change. Place on the 5 was $11.60.
Couldn't really separate the picks before the race.
The 3/5/4 Tri only paid $136.
Thanks for the answer HM, I'll see if I can post a looker with at least 2 mins. to post. Lookers are just as good as handicapped hosses.. USUALLY.
If you wanna know the method I used to separate/bet them let me know.
just a fyi,
none of the views in any part of the different forums are accurate at all because of computer driven spam spybots.
might be worth for us to turn them off essentially.
good luck w/ the horses.
IE
none of the views in any part of the different forums are accurate at all because of computer driven spam spybots.
might be worth for us to turn them off essentially.
good luck w/ the horses.
IE
Looks like this one shoulda stayed a NO PLAY.
A good no. of small bets down the drain for this one.
Going overboad on that one race sure didn't help. BUT, I KNOW that them LOOKERS are a definite PLUS over the long haul for me. BIG TIME!
I have to learn to tread lightly on these off tracks; records show that these are not Phunny Philly Bucks days for me.
A good no. of small bets down the drain for this one.
Going overboad on that one race sure didn't help. BUT, I KNOW that them LOOKERS are a definite PLUS over the long haul for me. BIG TIME!
I have to learn to tread lightly on these off tracks; records show that these are not Phunny Philly Bucks days for me.
NOW I get it
NOW I get it
VERY interlesting. Gotcha.
I visit one other forum and awhile back their online viewers would read something like 244 visitors and 2 members. Even during my crazy hours.
I was wondering if they were just enhancing the site .. you know, like making it look like there was more action going on. Now, I get it and also the wierdest names for people I see for the viewers. I guess thems robots. AH HAH!
Guess what, about a month age that other forum LOST the records of one of their biggest forums due to malicious attacks. They said that other forums experienced the same crap as well.
Thank you for the very informative FYI, IE.
NOW I get it
VERY interlesting. Gotcha.
I visit one other forum and awhile back their online viewers would read something like 244 visitors and 2 members. Even during my crazy hours.
I was wondering if they were just enhancing the site .. you know, like making it look like there was more action going on. Now, I get it and also the wierdest names for people I see for the viewers. I guess thems robots. AH HAH!
Guess what, about a month age that other forum LOST the records of one of their biggest forums due to malicious attacks. They said that other forums experienced the same crap as well.
Thank you for the very informative FYI, IE.
Last edited:
no prob,
we beefed up our security couple of months ago and will be doing more after the superbowl.
we beefed up our security couple of months ago and will be doing more after the superbowl.
