Nothing. It's a losing ticket. On both accounts.:shrug:
But since you asked, $1625 on a $100 bet.
MNF - come on, guys. YOU KNOW
- Thread starter MadJack
- Start date
Nothing. It's a losing ticket. On both accounts.:shrug:
But since you asked, $1625 on a $100 bet.
:00x32 ....OK Jackson, you win this round. But as soon as I figure out what your up to I'm gonna get rich.:SIB
The Ravens are 0-5 ATS and are still favored by 10 this Sunday.:shrug:
how about BUF 1st half +7? seems like decent choice considering dallas has scored way more in second half.
this one killed me
this one killed me
this one killed me
:mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07:
its so ridiculous that i was saying everything he would do in the second half and he did it.:shrug: You are living in a fantasy land
Sponge - give yourself some credit. Could it be that you simply have a good understanding of Favre's tendencies and playing habits and not that he's on the take? He's always been inconsistent. He is playing against an opponent. Everyone knows he starts forcing the ball when he gets frustrated.
Perhaps it's just more that you (and many others) can handicap his play and less that he's been bought out by some mysterious dark side.
By your logic, every mistake or shortcoming that any prominent player ever makes means that they were bought out. Please keep in mind that these are human beings playing against other human beings.
You ever play sports?
Yes and I also stated that Hasselback would be the reason the game would stay under because i saw his act before. The same guy who threw the interception right before the end of the half to ruin any chance to put points on the board. A terrible throw even a high school quarterback wouldn't have thrown. When you are told to keep the game under these are the things you do. I said it before the game now not after the fact. that game also happen to be the heaviest bet over on the board. Imagine how things like this happen. You have your opinion and i have mine but mine was said before the game. Who would be responsible? I said Hassleback. Who was responsible? Hassleback. A complete shutout to a team that was missing their best defensive player. But he ripped apart Tampa's defense that is just as good.
i also said this week you just watch how the espn leads people into believeing the big power surge in the Phillies Colo series. Now the first game went under. The second game they jumped the spread two points so it was a sign to back off but the third game was the one they really wanted. Two terrible pitchers against those two big hitting clubs and all the sudden we have a pitching duel.:shrug: give me a freaking break.
Wager details for ticket number 43560367-1:
Wager Type: Total
Wager Status: Win
Risk / To Win Amount: 550.00 / 500.00 (USD) Accepted 10/6/2007 9:01 PM - EST
Amount Paid: 500.00
Sport / Period: MLB Baseball / Game
Line:
GM#3 Philadelphia Phillies/GM#3 Colorado Rockies 10/6/2007 9:35:01 PM - (EST)
Under 11 -110
Pitchers: J Moyer -L - Must Pitch U Jimenez -R - Must Pitch
Sponge. Do you think the fix is on tonight? If the games are fixed it is the officials.
A QB, such as Brett Favre, would never fix a game. It is as simple as this, Brett Favre makes a ton of money. He is a mega mega millionaire. He cannot be bought, and if he could it would be for so much money that it would not even be worth paying him off. On the otherhand, officials can be bought off.
A QB, such as Brett Favre, would never fix a game. It is as simple as this, Brett Favre makes a ton of money. He is a mega mega millionaire. He cannot be bought, and if he could it would be for so much money that it would not even be worth paying him off. On the otherhand, officials can be bought off.
this was my favorite bet of the week. Originally i put 200 on it but i backed off and only put 50 on it. Now here we have a team that couldn't beat a high school team against another team with a bunch of phony coaches. This was the right spot to do this because what i have seen out of this phony UCLA team thru the years i just had that feeling the coach would have terrible play calling so his kids would have no chance
Ticket # 31746477 Placed: ONLINE-1 on: 10/06/2007 @ 02:22 PM WIN Risking 50.00 To Win 425.00
STRAIGHT BET
10/06/2007 @ 05:15 PM [387] NOTRE DAME +850 - CFB - WIN
WIN/LOSS for this bet: 425.00
Ticket # 31746477 Placed: ONLINE-1 on: 10/06/2007 @ 02:22 PM WIN Risking 50.00 To Win 425.00
STRAIGHT BET
10/06/2007 @ 05:15 PM [387] NOTRE DAME +850 - CFB - WIN
WIN/LOSS for this bet: 425.00
Right because if 2 games go over, then surely the 3rd one must go over as well
. It has to be rigged in order not to....Let me ask you - if a roulette wheel hits red 5 times in a row, do you feel it's rigged if it hits black on the 6th spin?
Thanks for the revisionist chest thumping.
Dude, let me tell you about the dime I won on Hawaii when they beat BYU as 3 point dogs 72-47 back in 2000. THAT was my favorite.
My feelings are in this thread in an earlier post. I wouldn't touch this game and access it more at halftime. Books won a ton of money this week and can give this one back. In an honest world Dallas just drills this shithole team. When i can see Romo is finally on the take like that stiff Bledsoe was then i would be all over Buffalo. You need someone on the take to lose to a terrible team like this. Officials can't do it all. The crook on Dallas is Roy Williams. If Buffalo covers it will be about bad calls and mistakes by Williams. To dangerous to touch this game. LIke i said the books won a lot this week and they want my money to. When i was younger i would be all over Buffalo trying to double my money and then find out what a great week i had (picks wise)and i broke even.:shrug: I don't make that mistake anymore.
Its not chest pumping and all to do with backing up what i said earlier. I know this is to difficult for you to understand but I try.
HOW GOOD IS DALLAS ?
HOW GOOD IS DALLAS ?
played : 0-5 stl, 2-3chi, 0-5 miami, 3-2 nyg.... combined records of 5-15 ......
HOW GOOD IS DALLAS ?
played : 0-5 stl, 2-3chi, 0-5 miami, 3-2 nyg.... combined records of 5-15 ......
Right because if 2 games go over, then surely the 3rd one must go over as well
...Let me ask you - if a roulette wheel hits red 5 times in a row, do you feel it's rigged if it hits black on the 6th spin?
But i said it before the game Smurph.:shrug: Nobody in their right mind would have taken that game under. I bet a lot of guys took it over tho. A ton of guys.
Roulete? there isn't the corrupt human element involved in it and that is why i don't play it. I don't gamble on shit i know is a bunch of luck.
