MSNBC SUSPENDS OLBERMANN

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
Listen King of "Chalk", when u say something on the Internet it is in writing and ya can't take it back. If a guy post he was in jail for killing three people but got out on appeal, I have the right to call him a killa. He is the one who wrote it in the first place. Now a guy like Maggot who has no proof a guy is a child molester but calls him one anyway, that my King of Chalk friend is uncalled for.

If Olberman didn't constantly point out Fox News bullshit so I child could tell, we would have more idiots roaming the streets.


I certainly missed something, who posted that the offed 3 people yet got off on appeal?

And, does it really matter if it's a chalk play and he wins? Just asking, not a pissing contest.
 

Cie

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 30, 2003
22,391
253
0
New Orleans
Im talking about you cous. Not Limbaugh

I said that I am a drug dealer:shrug: :0002

Either a joke on my part, or you have me confused with another

:mj07::mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07:


I meant what I said earlier. I'm pulling for you:toast:
 

BobbyBlueChip

Trustee
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
20,715
290
83
53
Belly of the Beast
I said that I am a drug dealer:shrug: :0002

Either a joke on my part, or you have me confused with another

:mj07::mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07:


I meant what I said earlier. I'm pulling for you:toast:

He was just putting out a feeler. . . .get off your phone and start looking for some customers. Could be a profitable night for you
:toast:
 

Woodson

L I V I N
Forum Member
Oct 23, 1999
15,508
79
48
Blockchain
He was just putting out a feeler. . . .get off your phone and start looking for some customers. Could be a profitable night for you
:toast:

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GUZCV95SCXE?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GUZCV95SCXE?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,485
161
63
Bowling Green Ky
I fail to come away from this with company policies on donations--relating to fair and balanced reporting.

Would anyone here have us believe

--MSNBC/NBC is not the most liberal biased news outlet?

--or not the least trusted by "voting citizens"


election night

Unsurprisingly FNC easily won in primetime as well as the 5p-7pm period. CNN pulled ahead of MSNBC but not nearly by the margins separating FNC and CNN.
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=407><COLGROUP><COL span=2 width=64></COL><COL span=3 width=93></COL><TBODY><TR height=20><TD height=20 width=64>8-11p ET</TD><TD width=64></TD><TD width=93>MSNBC</TD><TD width=93>CNN</TD><TD width=93>FNC</TD></TR><TR height=20><TD height=20></TD><TD></TD><TD></TD><TD></TD><TD></TD></TR><TR height=20><TD height=20>P2+</TD><TD></TD><TD>1,945,000</TD><TD>2,423,000</TD><TD>6,957,000</TD></TR><TR height=20><TD height=20>25-54</TD><TD></TD><TD>669,000</TD><TD>1,030,000</TD><TD>2,431,000</TD></TR><TR height=20><TD height=20></TD><TD></TD><TD></TD><TD></TD><TD></TD></TR><TR height=20><TD height=20>5p-7p</TD><TD></TD><TD>MSNBC</TD><TD>CNN</TD><TD>FNC</TD></TR><TR height=20><TD height=20></TD><TD></TD><TD></TD><TD></TD><TD></TD></TR><TR height=20><TD height=20>P2+</TD><TD></TD><TD>869,000</TD><TD>945,000</TD><TD>3,092,000</TD></TR><TR height=20><TD height=20>25-54</TD><TD></TD><TD>256,000</TD><TD>283,000</TD><TD>750,000</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 

Cie

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 30, 2003
22,391
253
0
New Orleans
Dogs, no one is labeling msnbc as anything less than the most liberally biased cable news network.
 

Trench

Turn it up
Forum Member
Mar 8, 2008
3,974
18
0
Mad City, WI
I fail to come away from this with company policies on donations--relating to fair and balanced reporting.
So you believe that a news network can donate $Millions to political organizations and candidates they support and still maintain objectivity?

You can't be serious.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,485
161
63
Bowling Green Ky
So you believe that a news network can donate $Millions to political organizations and candidates they support and still maintain objectivity?

You can't be serious.

Let me see if I can understand your objectivity.

One media has contract that forbids employees to donate to political parties therefore they/their employees are more objective/fair and balanced.

I fail to see any correlation and YES I'm serious.

Per your liberal logic -Oberman would have been objective on program until he donated.

++++++++++++++++++++++
Cie I know you weren't -but not to sure about the T brothers :)
 
Last edited:

Trench

Turn it up
Forum Member
Mar 8, 2008
3,974
18
0
Mad City, WI
Let me see if I can understand your objectivity.

One media has contract that forbids employees to donate to political parties therefore they/their employees are more objective/fair and balanced.

I fail to see any correlation and YES I'm serious.

Per your liberal logic -Oberman would have been objective on program until he donated.

++++++++++++++++++++++
Cie I know you weren't -but not to sure about the T brothers :)
You fail to see ANY correlation between Rupert Murdoch donating $1Million to the Republican Governors Association or NBC's parent company (General Electric) donating $Millions to PAC's (the majority of which are Republican) and the pretense that the news delivered by Fox or NBC is uncensored by their ownership?

You are one naive guy. I'm betting you support legalized bribery (aka "lobbying") as well.

:0corn
 
Last edited:

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
You fail to see ANY correlation between Rupert Murdoch donating $1Million to the Republican Governors Association or NBC's parent company (General Electric) donating $Millions to PAC's (the majority of which are Republican) and the pretense that the news delivered by Fox or NBC is uncensored by their ownership?

You are one naive guy. I'm betting you support legalized bribery (aka "lobbying") as well.

:0corn
...........................................................

when I read what he wrote I said to myself

DTBlackgumby cant be this stupid again can he.

Yep he could , he did , he will, he will again and again.

He just totally dont have the ability to cut through the bullchit and come up with a logical understanding.

Him and Mags are probably at the KKK meeting right now burning some crosses.
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
1235732758_dog_spinning_pn_turntable.gif
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Let me see if I can understand your objectivity.

One media has contract that forbids employees to donate to political parties therefore they/their employees are more objective/fair and balanced.

I fail to see any correlation and YES I'm serious.

Per your liberal logic -Oberman would have been objective on program until he donated.

++++++++++++++++++++++
Cie I know you weren't -but not to sure about the T brothers :)

Let me see... did anyone in this thread say that MSNBC or CNN was more fair and balanced than Fox in their reporting? More trusted? Or did you bring this up as some kind of point that IMO is off point?

The differences are, which there are two glaring ones that if you want to stay on point and address:

1. Fox News tagline - which they scream at every opportunity and is the main label for their marketing and promotion - is "Fair and Balanced." They have it on their main webpage as a part of their main logo. MSNBC and CNN, and other organizations do not make this statement, and do not make this the most important thing about how they supposedly report. So, they are claiming, unlike the other channels, that they are fair and balanced reporters that supposedly tell the true story in all of their reporting, and are down the middle.

2. NewsCorp has no company policy on donations, and is in fact active and public donators to conservative political organizations, while maintaining a publicly stated position to report in a fair and balanced way, which everyone knows is complete bullshit. And I do mean everyone that is not in a political argument trying to support the conservative agenda. MSNBC has a company policy forbidding their reporters to donate to any political parties, and when one of them did it, they were suspended.

So, we have on one hand a left-leaning organization that is unabashedly so, that make no other claims, and has a policy against donating to the parties and candidates that share their opinions. On the other, we have a foreign-owned billionaire, who paid $12 per viewer to cable companies to get his personal political message out and get his network on as many outlets as he could, helped by the Bush administration who put in an FCC head that pushed through legislation that allowed corporations to buy up as many outlets in as many markets as they wanted to, effectively taking over the majority of the message. Buying up markets, now buying up candidates and more public favor now and in the future, all under the outright corporate tagline lie of being "Fair and Balanced."

But I think you know all that, and just won't/can't allow the truth to be allowed, since it hurts your cause. But at least, there is probably only one person that allows your view to be correct here (yourself), or virtually anywhere. If we're dealing with a truly fair and balanced look at things, that is. Which not all of us, clearly, are.
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
Let me see... did anyone in this thread say that MSNBC or CNN was more fair and balanced than Fox in their reporting? More trusted? Or did you bring this up as some kind of point that IMO is off point?

The differences are, which there are two glaring ones that if you want to stay on point and address:

1. Fox News tagline - which they scream at every opportunity and is the main label for their marketing and promotion - is "Fair and Balanced." They have it on their main webpage as a part of their main logo. MSNBC and CNN, and other organizations do not make this statement, and do not make this the most important thing about how they supposedly report. So, they are claiming, unlike the other channels, that they are fair and balanced reporters that supposedly tell the true story in all of their reporting, and are down the middle.

2. NewsCorp has no company policy on donations, and is in fact active and public donators to conservative political organizations, while maintaining a publicly stated position to report in a fair and balanced way, which everyone knows is complete bullshit. And I do mean everyone that is not in a political argument trying to support the conservative agenda. MSNBC has a company policy forbidding their reporters to donate to any political parties, and when one of them did it, they were suspended.

So, we have on one hand a left-leaning organization that is unabashedly so, that make no other claims, and has a policy against donating to the parties and candidates that share their opinions. On the other, we have a foreign-owned billionaire, who paid $12 per viewer to cable companies to get his personal political message out and get his network on as many outlets as he could, helped by the Bush administration who put in an FCC head that pushed through legislation that allowed corporations to buy up as many outlets in as many markets as they wanted to, effectively taking over the majority of the message. Buying up markets, now buying up candidates and more public favor now and in the future, all under the outright corporate tagline lie of being "Fair and Balanced."

But I think you know all that, and just won't/can't allow the truth to be allowed, since it hurts your cause. But at least, there is probably only one person that allows your view to be correct here (yourself), or virtually anywhere. If we're dealing with a truly fair and balanced look at things, that is. Which not all of us, clearly, are.

Nice, Chad. :0074 You lay it out so clearly that even doggie can understand...not that he will.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top