Okay, so you're concern with my objectivity in teaching future students is directly related to your tax expenditures - why am I not surprised? One thing is certain I draw from your posted convictions: you care far more about how much money goes out of your pocket for things you personally don't agree with than virtually anything else. Does your mirror ever tell you that? Or do you blindly look in the mirror and see nothing but an unbiased thinker who considers what is best for everyone? Do you honestly think the society we live in would be a better place if every single person thought as you do? Do you ever give any real credence or thought to thinking of issues in another way?
I have no doubt that my perspective in looking at our financial world is arguable at best. In some cases, I know my thinking leans away from a completely sound economic view. Philosophically, I realize I am biased and could favor a view that might now always be best for our country. I will have to be mindful of my own biases, when teaching kids. About a lot more than just politics, by the way. Trust me - politics is a VERY small part of the educational day.
You mention in your assessment of what you're worried about with me that you think, "that I should represent all of america not just the 18% liberal element." Do you think that your thoughts and outlook are representative of all of America? Do you think the textbooks in our schools are representative of all of America? Do you think they paint a true picture of the actual history of our country? Do you even have a clue? Have any examples? Or do you sit in your insurance office that has never served a black person (I believe you said) and simply blame teachers for being biased in how they teach? Is it possible you have a little hypocritical view going on there? And I use the term "little" loosely.
I can assure you from what I've learned in my teaching education classes, and from my brief field experience, that the teachers really care about the students, and delivering fair messages. I'm sure there are some that don't, but most care a HELLUVA lot. And I have not heard ONE overly biased comment from ANY professor or teacher in high school that has not qualified their message by saying that something doesn't go on on both sides of the political aisle. Honestly, not one time. I'm sure in your biased view, you don't believe that. But considering the completely biased textbooks that hide actual history, and prevent students from learning the correct story about our country, teachers SHOULD add a little perspective if you are truly concerned about all students and Americans being properly being represented and informed.
By the way, how do you pay the union dues of teachers? By your tax dollars that they then use for union dues? You don't seem to worry about all the money you spend investing in corporations that pay directly into campaign funds and fund special interests, and pay lobbyists, etc. Wait, yes you do, for any corporation that doesn't share your world view. Again, I think we're back to the first part of this essay, where you only are concerned with your own special interests. I'm guessing that in most of those corporations, your money goes to a lot of people that make a helluva lot more than teachers do, care a lot less about having a positive effect on the lives of future generations (and the country), and some who actually defraud our country and it's citizens. But, I know that stuff doesn't bother you as much as your education tax dollars, so you don't need to bother with that.
I don't know about as I do--but I'd like to see each side live with their own convictions.
When you can tell me how your voting base could last without conservative base and why conservative base would not flourish without having to pack your base--I'll listen.
I basically have two probs with liberal element expansion of gov and expansion of gov dependent people. The 2 feed each other off the backs of productive self reliant population.
Example
I see where they are looking to cut social security benefits--which working folks paid into.
Yet your adimin just finished allotting 224 billion for entitlements under disguise of stimulus.
http://www.recovery.gov/Pages/default.aspx
--and expanding gov--
The number of federal workers earning more than $150,000 has soared in the last five years from 7,420 to 82,034.
Federal salaries have grown robustly in recent years, according to a USA TODAY analysis of
Office of Personnel Management data. Key findings:
?
Government-wide raises. Top-paid staff have increased in every department and agency. The Defense Department had nine civilians earning $170,000 or more in 2005, 214 when Obama took office and 994 in June.
?Long-time workers thrive. The biggest pay hikes have gone to employees who have been with the government for 15 to 24 years. Since 2005, average salaries for this group climbed 25% compared with a 9% inflation rate.
<SCRIPT type=text/javascript src="http://i.usatoday.net/_common/_scripts/_flash/flashresize.js"></SCRIPT><SCRIPT type=text/javascript> if (navigator.hasFlash(9)) { var query, flashFile; flashFile = "http://i.usatoday.net/_common/_flash/charts.swf"; query = document.location.search; if (query != "") { query = query + "&strFileName=" + window.location.protocol + "//" + window.location.host + window.location.pathname; } else { query = "?strFileName=" + window.location.protocol + "//" + window.location.host + window.location.pathname; } query += "&fileurl=20101109-nFedpay/"; query += "&preview=false"; flashFile = flashFile + query; usat.page.writeString('<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,0,0" width="227" height="25" id="graphva634249117244650911" align="middle">
<embed src="' + flashFile + '" wmode="opaque" quality="high" bgcolor="#ffffff" allowFullScreen="true" width="227" height="25" name="graphva634249117244650911" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="always" base="." type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" /></object>'); } else { usat.page.writeString('<table><tr><td class="inside-copy" align="center">To view this presentation, you need to install the Flash plug-in</td></tr>'); usat.page.writeString('<tr><td class="inside-copy" align="center">
GET IT NOW</td></tr></table>'); }</SCRIPT>
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-11-10-1Afedpay10_ST_N.htm
to compound matters you have PC liberal element teaching nothing but excuses on failure and why it is right redistribute the wealth--and continue toward socialism.
They can't see the obvious that it is socialism creating the failures.
When you start rewarding dysfunctional family values with monetary rewards and can't figure out why illegitamcy increases yearly to now over 70%--you got a problem--and to think it won't continue to expand based on the childrens environment is equally insane.
Europe is just beginning to see the error of their ways--
<CITE class=vcard>by Danny Kemp Danny Kemp </CITE>? <ABBR class=recenttimedate title=2010-11-11T03:44:37-0800>4 mins ago</ABBR>
<!-- end .byline -->LONDON (AFP) ? The coalition unveiled plans to withhold handouts for up to three years for those who refuse a job Thursday in the biggest shake-up of the post-war welfare state, a day after violent protests rocked London.
The government also plans a "universal credit" instead of the current system of separate benefit payments for housing and childcare as part of reforms aimed at cutting Britain's massive deficit.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
My rant isn't about teachers caring about children--its about their teaching opinion vs fact. As gov employees and card carrying union members I believe it is hard for some to be objective.
On a personal note--I think you'll make a great teacher and certainly wish you the best--but would also tell Little Johnny to disregard any political-economical etc opinion with grain of salt and weight the facts.