NBA SUN 032809 early thoughts - value hunting (NO PICKS INSIDE)
- Thread starter axp59
- Start date
made a promise to myself a couple of seasons ago to never bet the Nets, they are schizo. i like sixers, celts, the over and sac the rest of the night. thoughts?
- Mar 18, 2009
- 1,150
- 4
- 0
I hardly think I'm 0-1. I think I'm closer to risking 9-10U for the week which is about right. If that guy went 0-1 and that one loss was $10k...he had a bad weekend. The guys that went 2-5 and were playing $100 bets had a bad weekend but not as bad as his.
Down 1U for me would be about 9000 hkd by Eagle's accounting.
I hardly think I'm 0-1. I think I'm closer to risking 9-10U for the week which is about right. If that guy went 0-1 and that one loss was $10k...he had a bad weekend. The guys that went 2-5 and were playing $100 bets had a bad weekend but not as bad as his.
Down 1U for me would be about 9000 hkd by Eagle's accounting.
Ax,
I know you're not 0-1. I really didn't mean to compare, sorry if it came across wrong. I hate being down at all, even 1 unit. And wasn't comparing money amounts. I figure people bet what they can afford. 10K to one person is easier than a couple of hundred to another.
Again, sorry that it came acorss wrong and wasn't looking to make light of a losing week .
- Mar 18, 2009
- 295
- 0
- 0
burnetto57
burnetto57
Thinking the non-Under for Bost.
Did some last min cappin w/ OK/N.Carol game - total was high - immed thought of takin it - then realized the Under had been POUNDED since it came out from 165.5 down to 163 - So I went with it (also neither team has been putting this # up - lookin good - had I spent more time w/it - think would have gone heavier.:shrug:
burnetto57
Thinking the non-Under for Bost.
Did some last min cappin w/ OK/N.Carol game - total was high - immed thought of takin it - then realized the Under had been POUNDED since it came out from 165.5 down to 163 - So I went with it (also neither team has been putting this # up - lookin good - had I spent more time w/it - think would have gone heavier.:shrug:
Brother...all good man...just a counter point...maybe I came across wrong also...damn written words without tones, intonation, and emotions just doesn't always come out as intended. We're good brother...
Eagle...look at the C's over...if you like it...you should go for it. I don't want to touch them because I'm a homer....anyone else thinking about this play???
- Mar 18, 2009
- 1,150
- 4
- 0
PHX keeps getting pounded and line still sits at Phx - 6 and 86 % on Phx with 13695 bet #'s
Hey AX I wonder if your friends can help us with this. Why is this line not moving???
I would be scared about the Thunder's inability to score of late. Now 1-5 since Durant's return, and the only over was on account of Toronto's offence destroying OKC.
I also think Garnett's effect on UNDERS is overrated. He's one of the best defenders in the league, yes, but he's also a great offensive catalyst. I really think the effect for totals that he has is minimal, although this is just theory (without looking into it in depth), so I could definitely be wrong. Ax, I know you're a Celts homer, have you done this?
I also think Garnett's effect on UNDERS is overrated. He's one of the best defenders in the league, yes, but he's also a great offensive catalyst. I really think the effect for totals that he has is minimal, although this is just theory (without looking into it in depth), so I could definitely be wrong. Ax, I know you're a Celts homer, have you done this?
