ncaafb week 1
- Thread starter Cie
- Start date
Thanks gents....
2-1 +1.8U
Saturday card as of now:
Tulsa/Tulane un63.5 x2
Minn/Cuse un 48.5 x2
VT +7 x2
UGA +6 [-105] x1
Found this at another site:
Va Tech defensive stats
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's an interesting stat on Bud Foster's performance against new QBs since 2004.
*** TOTALS FOR 26 GAMES SINCE 2004 AGAINST QBS WITH FEWER THAN 10 CAREER STARTS BEFORE PLAYING VIRGINIA TECH ***
* Those 26 quarterbacks combined for 307 of 603 passing (50.9 percent) for 3,572 yards, 14 TD, 33 INT, 63 sacks; 257 rushes for 435 yards (1.7 ypc), 4 TD, 21 fumbles.
* The average for a quarterback in those 26 games was 137.4 yards passing, 16.7 yards rushing, 0.69 total TD, 0.81 fumbles, 1.27 interceptions and 2.42 sacks.
*** TOTALS FOR 18 GAMES SINCE 2004 AGAINST QBS WITH SIX CAREER STARTS OR FEWER BEFORE PLAYING VIRGINIA TECH ***
* Those 18 quarterbacks combined for 216 of 415 passing (52 percent) for 2,520 yards, 11 TD, 22 INT, 54 sacks; 212 rushes for 360 yards (1.7 ypc), 4 TD, 17 fumbles.
* The average for a quarterback in those 18 games was 140.0 yards passing, 20.0 yards rushing, 0.83 total TD, 0.94 fumbles, 1.22 interceptions and 3.0 sacks.
*** TOTALS FOR 9 GAMES SINCE 2004 AGAINST QBS WITH TWO CAREER STARTS OR FEWER BEFORE PLAYING VIRGINIA TECH ***
* Those nine quarterbacks combined for 88 of 185 passing (47.6 percent) for 1,111 yards, 6 TD, 8 INT, 20 sacks; 101 rushes for 298 yards (2.95 ypc), 4 TD, 7 fumbles.
* The average for a quarterback in those nine games was 123.4 yards passing, 33.1 yards rushing, 1.1 total TD, 0.78 fumbles, 0.89 interceptions and 2.2 sacks.
2-1 +1.8U
Saturday card as of now:
Tulsa/Tulane un63.5 x2
Minn/Cuse un 48.5 x2
VT +7 x2
UGA +6 [-105] x1
Found this at another site:
Va Tech defensive stats
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's an interesting stat on Bud Foster's performance against new QBs since 2004.
*** TOTALS FOR 26 GAMES SINCE 2004 AGAINST QBS WITH FEWER THAN 10 CAREER STARTS BEFORE PLAYING VIRGINIA TECH ***
* Those 26 quarterbacks combined for 307 of 603 passing (50.9 percent) for 3,572 yards, 14 TD, 33 INT, 63 sacks; 257 rushes for 435 yards (1.7 ypc), 4 TD, 21 fumbles.
* The average for a quarterback in those 26 games was 137.4 yards passing, 16.7 yards rushing, 0.69 total TD, 0.81 fumbles, 1.27 interceptions and 2.42 sacks.
*** TOTALS FOR 18 GAMES SINCE 2004 AGAINST QBS WITH SIX CAREER STARTS OR FEWER BEFORE PLAYING VIRGINIA TECH ***
* Those 18 quarterbacks combined for 216 of 415 passing (52 percent) for 2,520 yards, 11 TD, 22 INT, 54 sacks; 212 rushes for 360 yards (1.7 ypc), 4 TD, 17 fumbles.
* The average for a quarterback in those 18 games was 140.0 yards passing, 20.0 yards rushing, 0.83 total TD, 0.94 fumbles, 1.22 interceptions and 3.0 sacks.
*** TOTALS FOR 9 GAMES SINCE 2004 AGAINST QBS WITH TWO CAREER STARTS OR FEWER BEFORE PLAYING VIRGINIA TECH ***
* Those nine quarterbacks combined for 88 of 185 passing (47.6 percent) for 1,111 yards, 6 TD, 8 INT, 20 sacks; 101 rushes for 298 yards (2.95 ypc), 4 TD, 7 fumbles.
* The average for a quarterback in those nine games was 123.4 yards passing, 33.1 yards rushing, 1.1 total TD, 0.78 fumbles, 0.89 interceptions and 2.2 sacks.
cie did I see a wsp reference in another post. been followin them since the early 90's, anyway good luck this season
3-1 +3.8U
Added Navy +22. Ohio St has not covered against an unranked opponent with a ranked opponent on deck since 2006. All eyes on a winnable game vs. USC next week
Pending:
Minn/Cuse un 48.5 x2
VT +7 x2
UGA +6 [-105] x1
Navy +21.5 [-105] x1
Still considering these:
Col -10
LA Tech +13.5 [-105]
LSU un53
W Mich +13 [-105]
Two weeks ago, I was certain to play on New Mex. Lobos scare me now, despite my early inclination to fade TAMU in this spot. Not that I see TAMU winning by 3 scores, but too much uncertainty at New Mex for my liking.
I also removed WF from my leans. Originally, I had an inclination that WF would move the ball well. And they may do just that, but the lack of starting experience (not to mention lack of talent) at LB concerns me in this matchup againt the Baylor O, particularly with Briles and Griffin in their 2nd year together. Loss of both OT's (including 1 stud) can't help Baylor, but I am off of WF for sure.
GL:weed:
Added Navy +22. Ohio St has not covered against an unranked opponent with a ranked opponent on deck since 2006. All eyes on a winnable game vs. USC next week
Pending:
Minn/Cuse un 48.5 x2
VT +7 x2
UGA +6 [-105] x1
Navy +21.5 [-105] x1
Still considering these:
Col -10
LA Tech +13.5 [-105]
LSU un53
W Mich +13 [-105]
Two weeks ago, I was certain to play on New Mex. Lobos scare me now, despite my early inclination to fade TAMU in this spot. Not that I see TAMU winning by 3 scores, but too much uncertainty at New Mex for my liking.
I also removed WF from my leans. Originally, I had an inclination that WF would move the ball well. And they may do just that, but the lack of starting experience (not to mention lack of talent) at LB concerns me in this matchup againt the Baylor O, particularly with Briles and Griffin in their 2nd year together. Loss of both OT's (including 1 stud) can't help Baylor, but I am off of WF for sure.
GL:weed:
Last edited:
Hate to find myself on the "right" side of the Minn total, only to have my balls stomped by OT. Need a missed FG or a turnover here....
Fingers crossed. I felt he played a nice game to that point. His lack of experience finally bit him in the arse. He needed to throw that ball away and kick the 3.
