Its the easiest play in history,really.Nevermind the 9 points, thats a given.I see ml gtees on the Ravens all over the place,not to mention NE team total under,all Brady stats under,never mind174 snaps in 2 weeks for the Ravens D ....this game is easy easy easy.Its NEVER EASY...I m not sayin I wouldnt play em, but its never EASY and everyone seems to think.this one is that. The game I like is playing the team that advanced without covering the opening line of 2- vs Seattle, the Atl.Falcons.My guy has 4 I bought a point for -130, playing Atl+5 and +3 for 1st h.
Never seen such consensus on One Game as Ravens+9
- Thread starter edludes
- Start date
Maybe it is that obvious w Ravens/NE...one of the things I really believe is that the SB loser doesnt get back next year.
Look at Carib's real bet consensus.
http://www.caribsports.com/docs/ALL.caribpicks.html
Wagerline is a bunch of kids playing big time sports bettor online with fake money.
http://www.caribsports.com/docs/ALL.caribpicks.html
Wagerline is a bunch of kids playing big time sports bettor online with fake money.
edit: my commentary is really not needed by others.
bookmakers #'s, and i would only pay attention to any numbers for %'s on sunday morning if your into that sorta thing.
NFL - Jan 20
NFL CONFERENCE CHAMPIONSHIPS SUNDAY, JANUARY 20TH
POINT SPREAD OVER/UNDER MONEY LINE
12:00 PM
SAN FRANCISCO -4-110 ... 76.3% .... o49-110 85.3%... -205 41.1%
ATLANTA +4-110 23.7% u49-110 14.7% +175 58.9%
3:30 PM
BALTIMORE +8?-110 58.7% o51-110 77.6% +330 83.8%
NEW ENGLAND -8?-110 41.3% u51-110 22.4% -400 16.2%
Percentages represent the number of bets placed on each side of any given wager.
http://www.bookmaker.eu/sportsbook.aspx
bookmakers #'s, and i would only pay attention to any numbers for %'s on sunday morning if your into that sorta thing.
NFL - Jan 20
NFL CONFERENCE CHAMPIONSHIPS SUNDAY, JANUARY 20TH
POINT SPREAD OVER/UNDER MONEY LINE
12:00 PM
SAN FRANCISCO -4-110 ... 76.3% .... o49-110 85.3%... -205 41.1%
ATLANTA +4-110 23.7% u49-110 14.7% +175 58.9%
3:30 PM
BALTIMORE +8?-110 58.7% o51-110 77.6% +330 83.8%
NEW ENGLAND -8?-110 41.3% u51-110 22.4% -400 16.2%
Percentages represent the number of bets placed on each side of any given wager.
http://www.bookmaker.eu/sportsbook.aspx
i said that long ago about the SB loser never getting back since the bills pulled it off years ago
but i'm feeling Ravens are exahusted emotinolly and motivation aftera double OT win in a game that was lost except for a miracle last second TD and break down of Broncos defense
Also the Falcons were losers unless caroll dosent call a timeout LOL
Hey if Ravens can muster enough defense to shutdown Brady and put up at laest 30 points they win s/u But i expect Pats to do the 2nd half cha cha and pull away with that 20 second offense keeping ravens defense on heels and win the game huge
but i'm feeling Ravens are exahusted emotinolly and motivation aftera double OT win in a game that was lost except for a miracle last second TD and break down of Broncos defense
Also the Falcons were losers unless caroll dosent call a timeout LOL
Hey if Ravens can muster enough defense to shutdown Brady and put up at laest 30 points they win s/u But i expect Pats to do the 2nd half cha cha and pull away with that 20 second offense keeping ravens defense on heels and win the game huge
i`m honestly surprised that people are willing to lay a 4 spot with the 49ers on the road...this looks like the trap game of the season to me(given the overwhelming consensus)........they beat the packers at home now have to travel halfway cross country to play in atlanta....
granted,atlanta let down in the second half after dominating the first half,but,how unusual is that really?....denver basically controlled the first half against the ravens....and the absolutely lifeless texans even twitched a little after being embarrassed in the first half vs new england.....and who`s been hotter than seattle?..might have been the toughest out in the playoffs...
yes,kaepernick had a crazy game,but now he`s forced to do it again..in his first road playoff game ever....it looks from here like the usual overreaction...and how many times have we seen teams have a crazy offensive game one week and come out flat the following week?...
atlanta`s been getting dissed all year long based on statistical breakdowns...what everyone seems to be neglecting is the most important fact...the team keeps finding ways to win....
given the built in 3 point home field advantage,the books are basically saying that the 49ers would have been a 10 point fave at home during the regular season?....i`m not buyin` that...
i`m seeing an overreaction based on last weeks results...
granted,atlanta let down in the second half after dominating the first half,but,how unusual is that really?....denver basically controlled the first half against the ravens....and the absolutely lifeless texans even twitched a little after being embarrassed in the first half vs new england.....and who`s been hotter than seattle?..might have been the toughest out in the playoffs...
yes,kaepernick had a crazy game,but now he`s forced to do it again..in his first road playoff game ever....it looks from here like the usual overreaction...and how many times have we seen teams have a crazy offensive game one week and come out flat the following week?...
atlanta`s been getting dissed all year long based on statistical breakdowns...what everyone seems to be neglecting is the most important fact...the team keeps finding ways to win....
given the built in 3 point home field advantage,the books are basically saying that the 49ers would have been a 10 point fave at home during the regular season?....i`m not buyin` that...
i`m seeing an overreaction based on last weeks results...
I hear ya, Weasel, I was thinking ATL at first, and haven't yet decided what I'll do on this game. The thing that spooks me about Atl is the huge monkey removed from their back last week. It is possible that the Falcs may have hit an emotional crescendo. Curious how they respond. Also, I give gameday coaching edge to Harbaugh by a mile over his counterpart.....
By consensus, I meant at Madjackswouldnt.pay for.that type of info, though it is interesting.GW I m w a lot of ur Altanta reasoning.
Falcs can definitely benefit from the lack of respect. SF is hard football team. Atl will need to play with an edge. +4 points at home is appealing, especially when you look at SF's recent defensive performances in the payoffs and on the road. In the playoffs, they have given up 30+ points to Saints and Pack the past 2 seasons and Niners are allowing 30.6ppg their last 3 on the road( 1-2 record in those 3 games). I don't expect this to be a shootout, but sure seems the Falcs should be able to move the football.
Probably Atl or nothing on the side for me, but still unsure.
Every guy I know that thinks he is a "smart" bettor likes Atlanta.
Also, the line is fair... not much they could have done to abate public perception on Niners. If they thought Atlanta they could have made it SF -2 and kept it under 3
Also, the line is fair... not much they could have done to abate public perception on Niners. If they thought Atlanta they could have made it SF -2 and kept it under 3
Bought a point and got Balt +9-. Also added under 24- 1st h Atl SF,and bought a point and got the game at under49-.already played Atl 1st h +3 and game +5.will somehow resist playing the total in the late game, but.thered still time to go big on Balts Ml w the rest of the Madmen............
thought the same thing when I saw SF -4 which means -10 at home on the 3 pt principle
I would have thought that Vegas put -3 for SF which puts much more in variables of buying and potential push ... makes me think they want SF money OR trying to draw the other side
LOL ... why its called gambling :mj07: :0074
I would have thought that Vegas put -3 for SF which puts much more in variables of buying and potential push ... makes me think they want SF money OR trying to draw the other side
LOL ... why its called gambling :mj07: :0074
Saw on cowherds show, the guy he had on from vegas said two out of three bets r on New England AND San Fran. He pointed out that San Fran is eating a Td more than Seattle did at Atlanta last week and they arent a td better than Seattle.Atl is the biggest home dog in the last 35 yrs in this round said the"vegas expert."Was music to my ears since I ve bet my balls on Atl,Ne, and under Atl.Atl has failed to cover five straight playoff games, and has gone over a bunch in a row, and critically has John Abraham a lot less than 100% and unlikely to b a factor in this game.The coin.has two sides, but I like going against the two out of three....
- Apr 15, 2001
- 4,135
- 63
- 0
Scrapman also said the niners would lose last week cause they had a first time starting qb which he equated incorrectly to bing the same as a rookie.
Not saying Atl. can`t or wont win, but doubt they get a 20-0 lead over S.F. Should be a good game IMO. Thinking over myself.
Good luck to all.:toast:
Good luck to all.:toast:
I lied...I am playing the under 52- Ne/ Balts w great fervor.( i also like the under in Drake and all 4 nba games.)I listened to the Ravens pregame interviews and they rnt coming in quietly.Thinking of playing Ne-7, taking 7,8+9 as winners and just playing this total in the late game, feels better to me.
