new intelligence suggests major terror attack in u.s. this summer

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AP Exclusive: New intelligence suggests terror operatives in U.S. for major attack
- CURT ANDERSON, Associated Press Writer
Tuesday, May 25, 2004


(05-25) 16:51 PDT WASHINGTON (AP) --

U.S. officials have obtained new intelligence deemed highly credible indicating al-Qaida or other terrorists are in the United States and preparing to launch a major attack this summer, The Associated Press has learned.

The intelligence does not include a time, place or method of attack but is among the most disturbing received by the government since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, according to a senior federal counterterrorism official who spoke to the AP on condition of anonymity Tuesday.

Of most concern, the official said, is that terrorists may possess and use a chemical, biological or radiological weapon that could cause much more damage and casualties than a conventional bomb.

"There is clearly a steady drumbeat of information that they are going to attack and hit us hard," said the official, who described the intelligence as highly credible.

The official declined to provide any specifics about the sources of the information but said there was an unusually high level of corroboration.

Despite that, the official said there was no immediate plan to raise the nation's terrorism threat level from yellow, or elevated, to orange, or high. The threat level has been at yellow -- midpoint on the five-color scale -- since January.

Attorney General John Ashcroft and FBI Director Robert Mueller plan a news conference Wednesday to outline an intensive effort by law enforcement, intelligence and homeland security officials to detect and disrupt any potential plots. And the FBI plans to dispatch a bulletin to some 18,000 state and local law enforcement agencies warning of the threat.

The FBI also has already created a special task force that is focused solely on dealing with this summer's threat. The task force, whose existence until recently was classified, is intended to ensure that no valuable bits of information or intelligence fall through the cracks -- as happened repeatedly before the Sept. 11 attacks.

Other actions to be taken include new FBI interviews with people who may have provided valuable information in the past and a fresh examination of older investigative leads to determine if they might point to elements of the summer plot.

Beginning with Saturday's dedication of the new World War II Memorial in Washington, the summer presents a number of high-profile targets in the United States. They include the G-8 summit in Georgia next month that will attract top officials from some of America's closest allies, the Democratic National Convention in Boston in July and the Republican National Convention in August in New York.

The FBI and Homeland Security Department also are concerned about so-called soft targets such as shopping malls anywhere in the United States that offer a far less protected environment than a political convention hall.

U.S. authorities repeatedly have said al-Qaida is determined to mount an attack on U.S. soil, in part to announce to the world that it remains capable of doing so despite the money and effort that has gone into homeland security in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks.

There also is concern terrorists might try to mount an attack to coincide with the November election. The political fallout from the March 11 train bombings in Spain taught al-Qaida that an attack timed to an election can have a major impact. Spain's former ruling party was ousted in the voting that followed the bombing, which killed 191 and injured more than 2,000.

The official did not say how many suspected al-Qaida or other terrorist operatives are believed in the country, whether they made their way into the United States recently or have been here for some time. The FBI has warned in the past that Islamic extremist groups may attempt to recruit non-Middle Easterners or women for attacks because they would be less likely to arouse suspicion.

Special security attention already is being focused to the nation's rail, subway and bus lines. The FBI last week sent out an intelligence bulletin to law enforcement agencies urging vigilance against suicide bombers, who have been used by terror groups worldwide to devastating effect but not so far in the United States.

Separately, Immigration and Customs Enforcement chief Michael Garcia told reporters Tuesday that some 2,300 of its agents are being deployed to assist in security for the high-profile events scheduled this summer in the United States. These include as many as 20 agents each day working with the Secret Service to protect the campaigns of President Bush and Sen. John Kerry, the Democratic presidential candidate.

Garcia said his agency also is working to "tighten the investigative system" to ensure that terrorists do not enter the United States by way of human smuggling operations or through the vast, largely unprotected border with Canada.
 

TossingSalads

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 24, 2004
472
0
0
58
Just read that myself. Hmm maybe we should have tried to finish the Job on alqaeda. Wonder where I heard that before.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
I believe all media in the US can say were expecting another hit in next 8/10months and have a 50/50 chance at being rite. So nobody pays attention till it's to late. We need some leader ship to seprate fiction from fact.
 

TossingSalads

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 24, 2004
472
0
0
58
#4) Will you admit that we would have been better off staying the course in Afghanistan?
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
That's a given. And every American was 100% behind that effort.
To bad three guys thought differant.
 

bjfinste

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 14, 2001
5,462
18
0
AZ
Re: new intelligence suggests major terror attack in u.s. this summer

AR182 said:
[BThere also is concern terrorists might try to mount an attack to coincide with the November election. The political fallout from the March 11 train bombings in Spain taught al-Qaida that an attack timed to an election can have a major impact. [/B]

Recent America has shown a pretty strong trend of backing the President when something like this happens (re: Bush I in the first Gulf War and Bush II right after 9/11).

And say what you want to describe the terrorist leaders (i.e. insane, disturbed, crazy, whatever), but to organize an event like 9/11, you can't say they aren't smart, at least a dangerous-and-twisted kind of smart.

So if they were to do something like this to affect the election, I would have to believe they would do so in order to help Bush secure re-election, hoping he'll continue to provide them with the anti-American hatred that has made recruiting for them so easy in the last year+.
 

Blitz

Hopeful
Forum Member
Jan 6, 2002
7,540
46
48
58
North of Titletown AKA Boston
They keep talking about high profile targets like the conventions, but is it just me or is the media missing the boat on this...

Attacking high profile targets has not been al-Qaida's M.O. in the past. Why attack something so heavily guarded, when there is so many other targets that would be much easier...
 

saint

Go Heels
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
9,501
140
63
Balls Deep
djv said:
I believe all media in the US can say were expecting another hit in next 8/10months and have a 50/50 chance at being rite. So nobody pays attention till it's to late. We need some leader ship to seprate fiction from fact.

Separate fact from fiction? Do you really think terrorist activity is so black and white. Of course not, we're not going to get a call ahead of time or an invitation telling us where it's going to happen. No leadership in the world can piece together fragments of intelligence and get a complete puzzle. They can make generalizations and then generalized warnings. They will never be able to say exactly where or when it's going to happen. I'm not sure what you expect. I think you are naive if you blame our govt when an attack is certainly coming, for not being able to predict it accurately.
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
I know they should be quarding the public transportation system better. Just one suicide bomber or left behind luggage in a subway, in a financial district of some town will be devastating. The body count may not be as high but millions of people depend on public transporatation to get to work. If people are afraid to use it think what that will do to our economy. But we are spending billions in Iraq instead. We should have finished the job in Afaghanastan and shored up our defense at home.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,474
144
63
Bowling Green Ky
1st Question When did we pull out of Afgan?? From the media I frequent not only are we making great strides there but Pakistan has climbed on bandwagon as well. I do say we have dropped ball somewhat on reconstruction efforts.
So am I to assume from these statements that some think all our attention needs to be in country holding its own and we should cut efforts in Iraq???


----and more profound statements from the left--
"So if they were to do something like this to affect the election, I would have to believe they would do so in order to help Bush secure re-election, hoping he'll continue to provide them with the anti-American hatred that has made recruiting for them so easy in the last year+."

If you can remember just a "few" months ago just prior to a country by name of Spain and just prior to their election did you somehow read into it that the terrorist initiated the attack to sway elections to help the conservative party that had been fighting them or to get the liberal party in to do their exit stage left.

It is simple amazing to me how people can overlook the absolute obvious and come up with analysis to fit their beliefs. No wonder book makers flourish :)
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Saint take a look at thread, Oil Wins Again. You want oil protected or would you rather have your family protected. Leadership desides where to started first.
DTB we did not pullout of Afgan. But we did devert over 20000 troops to Iraq. We have no idea Afagn outcome with more force there to do the 9/11 payback. Seems Iraq became more important then 9/11 payback.
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
bjfiniste quote:"So if they were to do something like this to affect the election, I would have to believe they would do so in order to help Bush secure re-election, hoping he'll continue to provide them with the anti-American hatred that has made recruiting for them so easy in the last year+."


dtb also pointed this out in his previous post that alqaeda believes the american people will react like spain did a few months ago, & vote for a new gov't.

but i think alqaeda would seriously underestimate the american people if they think we would follow spain's route & change gov'ts. automatically after a terrorists attack. i believe we would still weigh the two candidates & choose the one we believe would fight the terrorists more effectively.

however, i don't think that there will be a terrorist attack this week. terrorists are more effective when there is a surprise attack. with all of the media talking it, the surprise is gone.
 

saint

Go Heels
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
9,501
140
63
Balls Deep
StevieD said:
I know they should be quarding the public transportation system better. Just one suicide bomber or left behind luggage in a subway, in a financial district of some town will be devastating. The body count may not be as high but millions of people depend on public transporatation to get to work. If people are afraid to use it think what that will do to our economy. But we are spending billions in Iraq instead. We should have finished the job in Afaghanastan and shored up our defense at home.


Every dime and dollar in the world couldn't stop suicide bombers. Get real. In winter what are you going to do, frisk every person in the NY subway system who has on a down jacket to check for bombs. You've got to be kidding me. There is literally no defense to suicide bombers. It's only a matter of time before it is brought to our soil.
 

bjfinste

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 14, 2001
5,462
18
0
AZ
DTB- I'm at a loss for words. We're not Spain. The terrorists know this. Did you even read my entire post? Everything you said I addressed, including why the scenario in Spain is different that the US.

AR- I agree, the terrorists would be very much underestimating the Americans if they thought we'd change the voting based on one attack. As I said in my previous post (the part DTB evidently didn't look at), anyone with half a brain can see the pattern of Americans throwing their support behind the president when things like that happen. Again, we're not Spain.

I don't think, even for a second, that the terrorists are stupid enough to think that by bombing something in October they could give the election to Kerry, because the opposite would likely happen and I can't possibly believe that the terrorists don't know that.
 

Wilson

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 8, 2002
4,426
10
0
1813 Virginia St
Salad Tosser quote: /Just read that myself. Hmm maybe we should have tried to finish the Job on alqaeda. Wonder where I heard that before.





fawk it...let'em win...let them come into this country and drag every last salad tosser out and rape them.

ST..you are the most negative, condescending cynical mfer I have ever seen. Unreal. :thefinger
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
Once again the Republicans try to politize terror. How dare they suggest that Al-Qaida might attack just in order to change ther election! They should be ashamed of themselves. First off the terrorist should love the Bush team. We attack countries and pay to rebuild them while on the other hand admit that terrorists we are fighting have no borders. What a disgusting joke.
 

TossingSalads

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 24, 2004
472
0
0
58
Wilson is that what you think I meant you putz? What I meant you fool is that we allowed them to regroup when we went to Iraq and I have been on a soapbox since before we went to Iraq.

:thefinger
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top