Someone posted on here that it is a vote grab.
Have to believe it - all annoucements like this are politically motivated, otherwise, why would he take on a hot button issue?
1 in 6 of his 'bundlers' is gay.
After this announcement, he had a huge fundraiser at George Clooney's house, hosting a lot of the West Coast movie elite who are all in support of gay marriage.
Follow the money, folks - it is not that hard.
It is interesting as it puts Romney and Obama in direct opposition - with Romney saying no to gay marriage. 4% of US population is estimated to be gay; not sure exactly on the % considered to be the religious right.
But it attempts to paint Obama as tolerant and Romney as intolerant.
I really do not care about it. Same can be said for most of the social issues - take care of the fiscal issues and some of the social crap will take care of itself.
I do not understand why "marriage" can not be defined for a man and a woman and they can create a new term for a union of man w man or woman w woman.
Lumi makes a very good point about tolerance though - the vehement anger from people in support of this issue against the people who oppose it is pretty scary. Free country - everyone is entitled to their views
Have to believe it - all annoucements like this are politically motivated, otherwise, why would he take on a hot button issue?
1 in 6 of his 'bundlers' is gay.
After this announcement, he had a huge fundraiser at George Clooney's house, hosting a lot of the West Coast movie elite who are all in support of gay marriage.
Follow the money, folks - it is not that hard.
It is interesting as it puts Romney and Obama in direct opposition - with Romney saying no to gay marriage. 4% of US population is estimated to be gay; not sure exactly on the % considered to be the religious right.
But it attempts to paint Obama as tolerant and Romney as intolerant.
I really do not care about it. Same can be said for most of the social issues - take care of the fiscal issues and some of the social crap will take care of itself.
I do not understand why "marriage" can not be defined for a man and a woman and they can create a new term for a union of man w man or woman w woman.
Lumi makes a very good point about tolerance though - the vehement anger from people in support of this issue against the people who oppose it is pretty scary. Free country - everyone is entitled to their views

