OJ Simpson EXPERT Reveals SHOCKING New Evidence!

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
104,744
1,398
113
69
home
I found this interesting so thought I'd share it but it's looooooong.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 

Smitty

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 5, 2005
6,837
1,645
113
Upstate NY
the only news about that story that would be "shocking" is if it turns out OJ really didn't do it, faked his own death to draw out the real killer, AND tracked down the real killer and turned him into the police.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kickserv

JOSHNAUDI

That Guy
Forum Member
Dec 12, 2000
10,156
323
83
49
Seguin, TX
www.schwartz-associates.com
What a mess. OJ's dream team had to know about all this?
You sure?

Not ALL Lawyers do Coke & Hookers.

:smilies4:smilies4:smilies4

Even with them knowing, there is no easy way to try to turn Nicole into the bad guy when she is dead and the mother of his children. The glove was an easier sell. I will say I didn't know about the Heidi Fleiss stuff from the 911 call until this podcast. That was interesting and did make me soften my, OJ is an angry asshole during that domestic disturbance, stance.

The whole, he left mid murder is pretty tough to swallow. Gets cut, watches Nicole get stabbed in the head, they double team Goldman, and the Juice makes his exit, goes to Chicago and then feigns ignorance is a big tale. If I'm the killer in that scenario and OJ was there and wrestled with me and my accomplice, I'm blowing up his White Bronco with him in it.
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
104,744
1,398
113
69
home
The whole, he left mid murder is pretty tough to swallow.
Especially with his kids in the house.

But maybe the 2 guys left before OJ did?

Not sure why the two witnesses that saw the 2 guys there was never brought up at the trial.

So much info was left out at the trial.
 

T

Registered
Forum Member
Sep 1, 2012
9,847
749
113
I was in Brentwood 48 hours after the murders and went to the gated sidewalk where it was still all yellow taped off and saw the massive blood stain on the ground. I then drove OJ’s timeline to McDonalds and the lies he told. He 10000000% killed them both.
 

JOSHNAUDI

That Guy
Forum Member
Dec 12, 2000
10,156
323
83
49
Seguin, TX
www.schwartz-associates.com
I too, have no doubt that OJ murdered both of them. But, I also have no problem entertaining this guy's theory. The guy had to come up with a way to get Juice to the crime scene, get cut and leave DNA at the scene but not actually do the killing. He also said OJ left the scene because he was super squeamish around blood. He then paints Cookie as the culprit and has evidence that Nicole and Goldman owed him Coke money. The real crime is that the LAPD botched this crime scene and created doubt. The guy has some good info I had not heard but he has to stretch the story to make it all fit and unfortunately it crosses too far into the improbable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: T

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,703
263
83
60
Fort Worth TX usa
The evidence never pointed to O.J.'s guilt. The fact of the matter is O.J. was not guilty and the entire investigation botched from the moment Ofc. Risky arrived on the scene and contaminated the scene and tampered with evidence. I have spent a great deal of time researching this entire investigation and subsequent trial and the state's evidence was faulty and never rose to the level of even being compelling.
I am certain many of you believe there was "mountains" of DNA evidence against O.J. because there was blood everywhere, but that is absolutely false. The FACT is there was less than .1 MLS of blood evidence of Mr. Simpson's collected at both scenes and the Broncos collectively all of which contained EDTA, a preservative and coagulent added to blood samples prior to testing. It was also shown by way of video evidence, that the collection of all the physical evidence at the scene had been cross contaminated by the forensic team, specifically Dr. Fung. Then there was the missing blood from the sample collection of O.J.'s taken by the LA county Medical examiner at LA county prison which was found to have 1.8 MLS missing from the vial while in police custody. The record shows that lead detective Van After broke chain of custody with the freshly drawn sample by physically putting the vial in his pocket while he then went from the third sub basement to the 7th floor of LA police department where his desk was, passing right by the evidence room on the first floor three separate times while going to his office and then to BOTH crime scenes. It was not until more than 10 hours later that Van After checked into evidence 10.2 MLS of the 12 MLS sample of O.J.s blood. Oddly enough this was about 3 weeks after the murders and LA had experienced some major rainstorms over the last couple weeks, well guess what was surprisingly found later that same day that had been somehow completely overlooked? Why a perfect little round drop of blood on the back gate of Nicole's condo. Somehow it had survived flash floods and torrential downpours when the huge stain on the walkway leading to the gate had not survived and was completely washed away! But wait, there's more of this huge discovery, turns out they totally missed this bloody sock lying in the middle of the floor of PJ's bedroom and lo and behold they must have totally been stepping over it for weeks....wow, who knew, and isn't it awesome that there's a perfect drop of blood on the sock that is a mixture of the victim's and PJ's blood!!! Only problem is with just a few minutes of analysis it was determined that the perfect drop of blood had somehow soaked all the way through the other side of the sock making two exact matching stains on the sock!!! Which if you're not catching it can only mean there was no foot or ankle in the sock when the blood was applied to the sock. There were no splatter stains on either blood drop either. So now we know where the missing 1.8 MLS of blood Van Atter illegally carried in his pocket two both scenes.
I could go on for hours explaining all the faulty "evidence" used to try and convict O.J. but until people apply the same objective scrutiny to the evidence that they would if it was themselves or a loved one on trial, most usually have their mind made up and refuse to even listen. It is a pity really.
 

kickserv

Wrong Forum Mod
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
May 26, 2002
90,341
1,499
113
50
Canada
If you think OJ is innocent of both of those murders, you also think the Earth is flat and gravity doesn't exist.
 
Last edited:

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,703
263
83
60
Fort Worth TX usa
The bloody glove found at the murder scene (by Det. Mark Fuhrman who was at the scene despite being off duty and told not to assist due to prior incidences with Nicole Brown,this will pop rove to be very significant later) was said to be hard and crusted with dried blood. Fuhrman placed the crusty glove in a plastic bag. Fuhrman also "found" the knit cap just a few minutes later, which he testified had dried blood on it as well. None was found. Now jump ahead several hours later and wouldn't you know if, Fuhrman had gone to OJs house to help out his buddies and wouldn't you know it Fuhrman arrived just in time to illegally enter OJs property without a warrant by scaling the gate and opening it for detectives who were actually working the case. Well they said they wanted to make sure OJ was okay supposedly, so they by ad to illegally enter his property to make sure he wasn't a victim as well, except that isn't what they did at all. First Fuhrman went into the back and began knocking on Kato Kaelins door and questioned him. After that he went around to the back of the house and talk about luck Fuhrman somehow finds the other bloody glove in the pitch black of night just look aging there. Fuhrman testified that this glove was wet and sticky with drying blood????? So the glove that was sitting outside for more than twelve hours was sticky and the one with the exact same blood on it only outside a few hours was dried and crusty? Well now Fuhrman has wet blood on his hands and wanders out front not to meet up with the detectives actually working the case but he doesn't go in the house and join up with them, no sir, he decided to "check out the Bronco" parked out on the street, not the Bentley in the garage or Rolls in the driveway, no he goes straight to the Broncos with his bloody fingers and talk about a super sleuth he finds the tiniest of blood smears in the dark of night on the INSIDE of the vehicle mind you. Wow, he's really good. I wonder why he was told he was not to go to those crime scenes because Nicole had complained about Fuhrman from past dealings and he was starting to be seen everywhere by Nicole, hence the complaints. Fuhrman also had a history with Simpson.
Just saying, if it was you on trial, I'm guessing you'd have lots of questions about Fuhrman as well
 

kickserv

Wrong Forum Mod
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
May 26, 2002
90,341
1,499
113
50
Canada
Believe what you want Brother

I refuse to believe somebody as smart as you actually thinks he didn't murder both of them.

There is nobody on Earth that actually thinks he was innocent (including the jury), and I include you in that list, you are just trolling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Slumdog

kickserv

Wrong Forum Mod
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
May 26, 2002
90,341
1,499
113
50
Canada
The bloody glove found at the murder scene (by Det. Mark Fuhrman who was at the scene despite being off duty and told not to assist due to prior incidences with Nicole Brown,this will pop rove to be very significant later) was said to be hard and crusted with dried blood. Fuhrman placed the crusty glove in a plastic bag. Fuhrman also "found" the knit cap just a few minutes later, which he testified had dried blood on it as well. None was found. Now jump ahead several hours later and wouldn't you know if, Fuhrman had gone to OJs house to help out his buddies and wouldn't you know it Fuhrman arrived just in time to illegally enter OJs property without a warrant by scaling the gate and opening it for detectives who were actually working the case. Well they said they wanted to make sure OJ was okay supposedly, so they by ad to illegally enter his property to make sure he wasn't a victim as well, except that isn't what they did at all. First Fuhrman went into the back and began knocking on Kato Kaelins door and questioned him. After that he went around to the back of the house and talk about luck Fuhrman somehow finds the other bloody glove in the pitch black of night just look aging there. Fuhrman testified that this glove was wet and sticky with drying blood????? So the glove that was sitting outside for more than twelve hours was sticky and the one with the exact same blood on it only outside a few hours was dried and crusty? Well now Fuhrman has wet blood on his hands and wanders out front not to meet up with the detectives actually working the case but he doesn't go in the house and join up with them, no sir, he decided to "check out the Bronco" parked out on the street, not the Bentley in the garage or Rolls in the driveway, no he goes straight to the Broncos with his bloody fingers and talk about a super sleuth he finds the tiniest of blood smears in the dark of night on the INSIDE of the vehicle mind you. Wow, he's really good. I wonder why he was told he was not to go to those crime scenes because Nicole had complained about Fuhrman from past dealings and he was starting to be seen everywhere by Nicole, hence the complaints. Fuhrman also had a history with Simpson.
Just saying, if it was you on trial, I'm guessing you'd have lots of questions about Fuhrman as well

The evidence never pointed to O.J.'s guilt. The fact of the matter is O.J. was not guilty and the entire investigation botched from the moment Ofc. Risky arrived on the scene and contaminated the scene and tampered with evidence. I have spent a great deal of time researching this entire investigation and subsequent trial and the state's evidence was faulty and never rose to the level of even being compelling.
I am certain many of you believe there was "mountains" of DNA evidence against O.J. because there was blood everywhere, but that is absolutely false. The FACT is there was less than .1 MLS of blood evidence of Mr. Simpson's collected at both scenes and the Broncos collectively all of which contained EDTA, a preservative and coagulent added to blood samples prior to testing. It was also shown by way of video evidence, that the collection of all the physical evidence at the scene had been cross contaminated by the forensic team, specifically Dr. Fung. Then there was the missing blood from the sample collection of O.J.'s taken by the LA county Medical examiner at LA county prison which was found to have 1.8 MLS missing from the vial while in police custody. The record shows that lead detective Van After broke chain of custody with the freshly drawn sample by physically putting the vial in his pocket while he then went from the third sub basement to the 7th floor of LA police department where his desk was, passing right by the evidence room on the first floor three separate times while going to his office and then to BOTH crime scenes. It was not until more than 10 hours later that Van After checked into evidence 10.2 MLS of the 12 MLS sample of O.J.s blood. Oddly enough this was about 3 weeks after the murders and LA had experienced some major rainstorms over the last couple weeks, well guess what was surprisingly found later that same day that had been somehow completely overlooked? Why a perfect little round drop of blood on the back gate of Nicole's condo. Somehow it had survived flash floods and torrential downpours when the huge stain on the walkway leading to the gate had not survived and was completely washed away! But wait, there's more of this huge discovery, turns out they totally missed this bloody sock lying in the middle of the floor of PJ's bedroom and lo and behold they must have totally been stepping over it for weeks....wow, who knew, and isn't it awesome that there's a perfect drop of blood on the sock that is a mixture of the victim's and PJ's blood!!! Only problem is with just a few minutes of analysis it was determined that the perfect drop of blood had somehow soaked all the way through the other side of the sock making two exact matching stains on the sock!!! Which if you're not catching it can only mean there was no foot or ankle in the sock when the blood was applied to the sock. There were no splatter stains on either blood drop either. So now we know where the missing 1.8 MLS of blood Van Atter illegally carried in his pocket two both scenes.
I could go on for hours explaining all the faulty "evidence" used to try and convict O.J. but until people apply the same objective scrutiny to the evidence that they would if it was themselves or a loved one on trial, most usually have their mind made up and refuse to even listen. It is a pity really.


Two good trolls above...(y)
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
104,744
1,398
113
69
home
Marlon Brando Godfather GIF by Filmin
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top