you're picking 18 out of 19. and telling us about it after the fact?
why aren't you sharing that Spongecakey goodness?
on this Tim Donaghy shit
- Thread starter EXTRAPOLATER
- Start date
you're picking 18 out of 19. and telling us about it after the fact?
why aren't you sharing that Spongecakey goodness?
To many neocon thinkers Tapir. The thought of me making them a penny is to disturbing for my liking :SIB
I don't think you need to worry about too many folks hopping on your free lunch wagon, stud.
There are still plenty of other guys here who bump their "play" threads 6-12 times a day...........
No, the guy who was standing in the ungodly long line with me was insisting that the fixes come down from the league's head office. Not some rogue ref looking to make some money.
This Donaghy stuff - yea.. a ref influenced the game, but he wasn't carrying out orders from the corporate office like that other douchebag was ranting about.
Marine i got it. Politics are all on the up and up as well as sports. Oh and those emails offering me millions of dollars are missed opportunities. Marine i can't think of any poster in my 15 years of posting that i would rather not go back and forth with. You are as gullible as they come. Book smarts yes. Streets smarts god no. What this ref is now saying he is making all up. Just like Sammy Gravano did to frame John Gotti.
can you forward me those million dollar emails? If you aren't going to hop on the money train, I will.
How you draw the federal government into refs trying to shave or add points is entertaining to say the least.
How you draw the federal government into refs trying to shave or add points is entertaining to say the least.
marine i deleted the original letter but they wanted an address so i gave them this one.
Mr Tug Myweeny
44 full of shit street
Phila, Pa. 19056
Then they sent me this follow up which i still have. Feel free to move forward.
Hello Mr. Tug Myweeny,
How are you today? I am Mr. A. C . Moks, i am the secretary of Mr.John Cole, i got your email and i have been directed by my boss to send your check to you but unfortunately he did not drop the money for the currier service which i am suppose to use to send the check to you, and i spoke with him which he has told me that he indicated it in the email he sent to you that you should take care of the currier expences,and i have been in contact with the currier service to comfirm how much it will cost to send your check to you, and is going to cost $200, so if you know you are ready for this please get back to me to enable me give you directive on how to send the money, and a soon as i get the money i will go to the currier company and mail your check to you immediately, please i will higly appreciate your promptness in everything you do because i am a very busy person and i will like us to conclude this as fast as possible. Please call me on this number: +234-808-308-2722. Please call me.
I must let you know that this is not in any way a scam.
Hoping to hear from you.
Regards,
Mr. A. C. Moks
Put your money were your mouth is and i will give you five to one odds and show you those last 21 wagers ending on Sunday night.
OMG, PLEASE tell me we aren't going to have to suffer through you two trying to come to terms on a bet again.........:s1:
Personally, I can't imagine any kind of advantage in trying to bet on games that might have some kind of fix on them, whatever it might be. As I said, some umps and refs seem to somewhat favour the home squads but, for umps at least, we have that information available at our disposal (which is what merit I give it). I try to 'cap games based on available information and whatever inspiration might come when considering whatever I can. Anybody that thinks that they can make money based on what the "public" is betting or what the "league wants" is probably in for an arduous journey. This recent Donaghy shit kinda pisses me off but, other than maybe avoiding a sport that a don't know anyways, I don't think I'll be changing my approach in the near future.
Interesting replies, anyways.
For the most part.
Interesting replies, anyways.
For the most part.
Not true! Sponge is 19 of 21 in "after-the-fact" plays last week!
I'm willing to bet that when the two current series conclude, he will give us a breakdown on how those games went, too!
"Anyone should have known the league wasn't going to let Boston continue to lose on the road once they let a game slip away at home. If you didn't pound Boston at Detroit the very next game, you're a fool! Now, this team couldn't win a game on the road the entire playoffs, but NOW they win by 15? RIIIIIIIIIIGHT!"
And of course, since Boston didn't cover last night, the story will go a little something like this:
"Stern wants the LA/Bos series to happen, so you know that was going to come through, but all the money was Boston -6 or 6', so the refs and players had to make sure the game stayed under a 6 point win. If you were dumb enough to not see this one a mile away, I can't help you anymore than that!"
