Online Crackdown: Subcontracting for Casinos

cisco

Registered
Forum Member
Dec 1, 2000
6,360
18
0
usa/mexico
Online Crackdown: Lock Down Gambling Sites, Go To Jail!


A new U.S. Justice Department policy threatens to jail security professionals who help lock down online gambling sites anywhere in the world.

For example, you're a computer security expert who's hired by an offshore casino in Costa Rica to develop a security and authentication technology. Your client is a licensed Costa Rica Casino that has been operating for years, and wants to make a foray into online gaming.

You perform a standard penetration test, a security assessment, an architecture and code review, help establish the SSL and authentication protocols, and help with firewall implementation and monitoring - you know: the full suite of security services. You test the beta site and its configuration, and give your stamp of approval.

With check in hand, you return to America and days, weeks or months later, the site goes active. A few weeks after that, you are visited by an FBI agent with a federal grand jury subpoena seeking records relating to your security work. Weeks after that, a knock on the door announces the arrival of deputy US Marshals with a warrant for your arrest for violation of 18 U.S.C. 1084 and 18 U.S.C. 2.

Your computer security consulting may have earned yourself a one-way ticket to the hoosegow.

US law generally makes it a crime if you are "engaged in the business of betting or wagering" and you "knowingly [use] a wire communication facility for the transmission in interstate or foreign commerce of bets or wagers or information assisting in the placing of bets or wagers on any sporting events, or contest..."

This statute, 18 USC 1084, is called the "wire act" and has been applied for more than 70 years to go after offshore bookies who seek to evade US law by locating overseas.

However, Internet gambling is legalized in Liechtenstein, Gibraltar, Australia, New Zealand, Costa Rica, and a few Caribbean islands. So the first question is whether Internet gaming by a company in a country that permits it is a violation of US law. The US Justice Department argues that it is - and has the arrests and convictions - guilty pleas - to prove it. The theory is that entities that are in the business of betting or wagering (even where this is legal), who use international communications facilities like the Internet, and in some way "enter" or "affect" the United States or US citizens, are violating the Wire Act.

What could does this mean to you, the security professional? You aren't in the "business" of betting or wagering. You haven't taken any bets over international wires.

The punishment for aiding and abetting, however, is the same as for committing the underlying crime.
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
105,796
2,086
113
70
home
just shit can the constitution and become a police state now and get it over with already.

bastards!!

WTF is going on here??!!
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Little by little if we let them. They will take some of our freedoms away based on security. Seems to be there excuse for much now days.
 

fletcher

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 21, 2000
16,136
9
0
63
henderson,nv.
nothing is ever going to happen, infact gamming is getting bigger each years with in the last 2 years wvu, pa, and other states back east have gone to machaines with the state getting a cut and over viewing the running of them , you can have up to 5 each in a bar and have these mini casinos that you can have up to 15 as long as you serve drinks and some type of food, and it is just not 1 or 2 opening up in towns, everyone who owns a bar is trying to get them and in most towns and cities you have at least 15-20 of these mini casinos and most are owen by 2 or 3 people in the same city, the state is getting a nice cut and they have the eye in the sky that goes right into the states captiol who have people 24/7 taping and watching all action. people that vote lot more then you think gamble off shore and all your vfw's elks and lodges are allowed 10 in their club so it is growing, and like i said lot of voters and big time people with money play offshore and they will not let the goverment vote it out and the big kicker is if they did cut offshore then all your race tracks across the us which back east are allowed to have up to 500 machines in the states I said, but you could not bet off track action at these tracks or in vegas, and trust me that is never going to happen, it brings in jobs to the states and mega money and you cut off shore you have to cut off track betting, there is much more going on and no bill would pass wasteing tax money for this, if you think the people are pissed off now about how money is spent wait and see if they ever tried this, gamming is never going away just going to get bigger, and it would als knock out state ran lottery keno which many states have that runs a new game every 5 mins 24/7 so don't think you have much to worry about, and vegas is going online at some point 3 megas resorts are already setting up shop in the uk, just lot of hot air from a few idiots who think this is the big problem in this country. relax it is not going anywhere. take 1 away you would have to take many state money makers away and that won't happen it is growing like I said. and the wire act does not go for pc's that use a dish either, nor does it really count as the same as a dail up mode. would not worry, the money will never get wasted and it takes money to pass lot of money.
 

Marco

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 29, 2003
793
0
0
Gambling may be growing, as witnessed by more states getting into state sponsored video lottery machines, scratch cards, keno.......more are allowing casinos on Indian reservations.....

Here in Nebraska they're trying to place a couple more casinos in the Omaha area.......video lottery has yet to be ok'd here.....we have keno, scratch cards, pickle cards, powerball.....

What happened in South Dakota......video lottery was passed....went over big at the start, then everybody and God wanted a machine or banks of machines in thier business.....everyone wanted a piece of the pie.....pretty soon there was a machine on every corner and four inbetween and everyone got a piece of the pie........now everybody's piece of the pie amounts to a couple of crumbs.......vendors and the businesses got the shaft and the state got the gold mine.....state got a fixed percent and as the number of machines increased the state kept it's percentage and the vendors and businesses kept getting whittled down by increased competition......

There were places in SD where limits were put on the number of games allowed in one business.......places got around this quota by putting walls up and making separate rooms, and giving these new rooms business structure.......so if they had a maximum of, say 10 machines allowed.......they put walls up, put 8 or 10 machines in each room....each room was a separate business from the other ones....

I can easily see the same thing happening here in Nebraska if they legalize video lottery........everybody gonna go apeshit trying to get machines in thier business.......greed and the almighty dollar, pretty soon the money tree is so cut up and dispersed that everybody gets one leaf.....

Only real reason I would be for it is that it opens up the minds of the legislative branch.......maybe enough to eventually allow legalized sports betting......Christ there are casinos across this whole country and the only ones that can take sports betting are in Vegas? I guess after you put in rows and rows of slots......a few blackjack tables, a couple of craps tables, a bingo room and a poker room, that it's obscene to have a odds chart on the wall and a window or two to take sports bets?:confused:

I don't foresee the government actually allowing sportsbooks in the near future......judging by the fact that what crummy forms of already legalized gambling have taken so slowly to spread across the 50 states.....

If the government does allow it you can be assured that they will screw with it enough that they get a good percentage of the profits, either through bad odds or taxation.......instead of betting with odds of 11/10 or reduced juices of -107 or -105.......we'd end up betting at 6 to 5......or some crappy parlay card scenario.....

The state doesn't allow any form of gambling where the individual has a legitimate chance of winning.......sports gambling at 11/10 means the individual must win around 52.35% of his wagers.....what state sponsored form of gambling has a 2.35% edge? About the only thing that comes to my mind might be blackjack.....only then if the player is counting cards and playing perfect strategy.....then if he wins on any regular basis the pit boss points him to the exit door.....

Might as well burn all the books, and make it a law that all houses be made of glass so we can see what the person inside is watching on tv, what web sites he goes to.....what he eats and smokes and just how long he spent on the crapper.......then when he goes to the bedroom we will all know if he's gay or straight and just who he's fawking, then they can make sure he's married, cause thats just a real crime to have consentual sex outside of marriage.....

All the advances in electronics and computers is just the tip of the iceberg of our erosion and invasion of our privacy and our freedoms.....it will get worse.....
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top