Packers will win super bowl
- Thread starter Dirty Juice
- Start date
Hope everyone had a great week. . . This game scares me more than I thought, let's keep it from Hester, PLEASE!!
- Mar 19, 2006
- 38,518
- 492
- 83
- 74
opcorn2
i thought abuot this post after they won man..
lookin good so far vegas thinks you are the right side...
GL man
lookin good so far vegas thinks you are the right side...
GL man
Last edited:
i might hedge for a bit if the line goes to 3.5, which is unlikely, and try for the 3-point middle
otherwise, I love the Pack in this game, just like I did in July
otherwise, I love the Pack in this game, just like I did in July
dont think it hits 3.5....if it does im going to have to reconsider my steelers bet. If vegas allows it too go that high, they are begging for steelers money IMO.
i just dont see it man. steelers just seem like a more complete team to me.
but you have been right this far so cant knock ya for still being confident.
i would hedge slightly for sure, just to garauntee no loss, but if your that confident let it ride. no money is gauranteed so i would play it safe.
GL to ya DJ whatever ya decide.:toast:
Personally, I would hedge too.....
Say you had $100 to win $1000..... I would bet Pitt +3 for $500.... then the outcomes would be:
1. Packers win by 4 or more.... you win $450
2. Packers win by 3.... you win $1000
3. Packers win by 1-2... you win $1500
4. Steelers win .... you win $400
Don't know how much you bet, but I'd sure like to be guaranteed $400 in any situation (if this was the amount of your original bet).....
Or you could always look at playing a half time bet, where you might get a huge middle if the Packers are ahead at half... although if Pitt is ahead, you won't likely have much of a middle opportunity, if any...
convinced me ....gauranteed money is the best money...
just get drunk and know your collecting. :mj06:
Mags, my bet was $100 to win $1000, so all your scenerios make sense, I just truly believe the Pack is gonna win this game. Luckily I have two weeks to decide:0003
let me preface this by saying am cheering for the packers, as they are simply the more fun team to watch (unless you're giving points and HC/mccarthy comes off gas in 2H to make it game -which can be stressful)...
the only hiccup i see for the pack is, this will be 6th game in a playoff type of scenario for them, and to win that many in a row is extremely hard. -granted giants and atl werent really game
they hadto win out since 2nd to last week of reg season (vs giants)
props to GB as they did what they needed to
i know, its the super bowl and is totally different than any the other games coming in, as has extra time to prep and no other game matters as much as this (so to pull out all stops).
i jus have this hunch (maybe like feeling you have in that they'll win) that the winner of AFC was going to take it this year- as chi is inferior squad, and gb couldnt maintain playing this well w/o coming up short somewhere (maybe they came up short in 2H of chi game --but were already to ahead to lose?).
granted, thats a take with really no factual basis or stats to support, and i hope i'm wrong, though, if were you would try and hedge like mags said -though, thats me, and perhaps would affect karma of possibly original ML play
GL man- i hope you cash regardless.
the only hiccup i see for the pack is, this will be 6th game in a playoff type of scenario for them, and to win that many in a row is extremely hard. -granted giants and atl werent really game
they hadto win out since 2nd to last week of reg season (vs giants)
props to GB as they did what they needed to
i know, its the super bowl and is totally different than any the other games coming in, as has extra time to prep and no other game matters as much as this (so to pull out all stops).
i jus have this hunch (maybe like feeling you have in that they'll win) that the winner of AFC was going to take it this year- as chi is inferior squad, and gb couldnt maintain playing this well w/o coming up short somewhere (maybe they came up short in 2H of chi game --but were already to ahead to lose?).
granted, thats a take with really no factual basis or stats to support, and i hope i'm wrong, though, if were you would try and hedge like mags said -though, thats me, and perhaps would affect karma of possibly original ML play
GL man- i hope you cash regardless.
Last edited:
I think GB matches up perfectly with PITT, and while I would have loved to see GB run away with that game in second half vs CHI, saving me a heart attack, it was a divisional opponent for the third time, those games just get ugly in all of the divisions
