the suspensions for Asham and Neal seem appropriate.
IMO, Neal should have gotten at least 2 games... 2 incidents and repeat offender. Carl Hagelin or Andrew Shaw must be looking at this and saying to themselves: "WTF?"
the suspensions for Asham and Neal seem appropriate.
IMO, Neal should have gotten at least 2 games... 2 incidents and repeat offender. Carl Hagelin or Andrew Shaw must be looking at this and saying to themselves: "WTF?"
the suspensions for Asham and Neal seem appropriate. Quick question, and I'm in no way backing what Asham did, but was I the only one that it looked like Schenn left his feet on his hit prior to Asham unloading on him? Again, Asham crossed the line, but looked like Schenn left his feet to me and I'm sure the Pens had a bullseye on Schenn due to his cheap shot on Crosby late in the regular season.
Schenn never left his feet on his hit, he just blew up the pens player.
However i do think the crosscheck by Asham looked worse than it was, but the intent to injure was there. Not to mention the punch to the back of the head when Schenn was face down.
think Asham should have gotten more than 4 games.
my complaint is Neal was suspended for his hit on Giroux, not the hit on Couturier which was worse in my opinion. :shrug:
More suspensions in 1 week than the entire playoffs last year.
where is the weasel Bettman at to defend his league to the people that say hockey is to violent?
i hate that f*ckin' guy!!!:chairshot
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.