http://www.yahoo.com/_ylh=X3oDMTB2M...ry&u=/ap/20050910/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_ap_poll
Think Carter was the last to hit that number..
Think Carter was the last to hit that number..
Presidents Approval rating below 40
- Thread starter Clem D
- Start date
Nixon and Truman were both couple points lower. Good company I guess. If his old man would have made a second term. He might have had the record for low. He was almost there. Thats why Clinton was elected.
Looks like Karl heard you. Bush in N OR and Miss for more picture ops today. Look I'm doing good job. Yes sir slowing down the process. They just get in the way after a visit or two. What they should do with all that press that hangs around. Take there cameras away and give them shovels. That would be end of visits.
Almost as staggering as the early "exit polls" last Nov. 2 right? lol
If our country wanted someone who would make decisions based on "poll popularity" then we would have elected John Kerry. Kerry used to wet his finger and stick it in the air to see which way the political wind was blowing that day. (everyone knows this but fails to admit it)
Remember when John Kerry was FOR the war? Then Howard Dean started picking up steam with his anti-war vehicle and John Kerry instantly flip-flopped and jumped aboard because he was afraid he would miss out on the nomination. Yeah, real good candidate!! Imagine flip-flopper Kerry as president!! scary
Thank god we have a president who does the right thing based on morals and logic, not poll numbers. Good thread!!
If our country wanted someone who would make decisions based on "poll popularity" then we would have elected John Kerry. Kerry used to wet his finger and stick it in the air to see which way the political wind was blowing that day. (everyone knows this but fails to admit it)
Remember when John Kerry was FOR the war? Then Howard Dean started picking up steam with his anti-war vehicle and John Kerry instantly flip-flopped and jumped aboard because he was afraid he would miss out on the nomination. Yeah, real good candidate!! Imagine flip-flopper Kerry as president!! scary
Thank god we have a president who does the right thing based on morals and logic, not poll numbers. Good thread!!
Last edited:
Thank god we have a president who does the right thing based on morals and logic, not poll numbers. Good thread!![/QUOTE]
:mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07:
:mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07:
You're just mad because the truth hurts. Thanks for your keen insight on the topic though PD1. I'm jealous of your debating skills.
Just for starters....
1. 400,000 mass graves of innocent people have been uncovered in Iraq. Women and children bound and shot in their skulls. Rape rooms open for business.
2. Saddam firing anti-aircraft fire at our jets as they patrolled the no fly zones, trying to kill our boys.
3. John Kerry, Al Gore, Bill Clinton, Madeline Albright, Sandy Berger, John Edwards, Hillary Clinton, Barbara Boxer, Nancy Pelosi, Ted Kennedy ALL said that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.
4. Satellite photos of large trucks moving tons and tons of shit out of the Al Qua Qua weapons facility 3 days before the U.S. invasion.
Yeah, I'd say the president did the right thing. :clap: Critisize him all you want. People hate the N.Y.Yankees and their 25 World Championships too! :mj14:
Just for starters....
1. 400,000 mass graves of innocent people have been uncovered in Iraq. Women and children bound and shot in their skulls. Rape rooms open for business.
2. Saddam firing anti-aircraft fire at our jets as they patrolled the no fly zones, trying to kill our boys.
3. John Kerry, Al Gore, Bill Clinton, Madeline Albright, Sandy Berger, John Edwards, Hillary Clinton, Barbara Boxer, Nancy Pelosi, Ted Kennedy ALL said that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.
4. Satellite photos of large trucks moving tons and tons of shit out of the Al Qua Qua weapons facility 3 days before the U.S. invasion.
Yeah, I'd say the president did the right thing. :clap: Critisize him all you want. People hate the N.Y.Yankees and their 25 World Championships too! :mj14:
Last edited:
PD1, I guess we're the only ones who see the irony in that statement.
Manson, you have got to be the only one who would try to put a positive spin on something that 60% of the people know to be true, then again 60% of the people in this country probably don't have thier head up their ass, another 40% catagory you fall into.
Manson, you have got to be the only one who would try to put a positive spin on something that 60% of the people know to be true, then again 60% of the people in this country probably don't have thier head up their ass, another 40% catagory you fall into.
No Penguin in fact since Madjacks is 95% liberals, I probably am the only one who agrees with my statement. If you liberals actually agreed with me then I would start to worry a little lol. You can say I have my head up my ass all you want but I base my opinions on facts, morals and logic, not angry resentment, partisan bullshit or poll numbers. You flat out ignored my statements about John Kerry because you know they are accurate.
Who's poll was it anyways? Oh, the Associated Press?
:mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07:
That explains it.
Who's poll was it anyways? Oh, the Associated Press?
:mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07:
That explains it.
Last edited:
95% liberal? No, it's about 50/50, but it just seems that way to you because even the conservatives here don't post in agreement with anything you say. Well, except for your alter-egos Palehose and Scripple Pabble.
Manson, I have said several times I am a fairly conservative republican, but that does not mean I should have blind faith in a leader who does nothing but **** up everything he touches.
He was reelected because Rove is a genius and turned presidentail politics into a religious battle. He certainly has not had too many shining momenets in his presidency that is for sure.
Capturing the killer who filled mass graves and liberating 50,000,000 people is prob Bush's most shining moment to date. Or maybe protecting the homeland from further terror attacks. Keep the partisan wool pulled over your eyes though Clem.
When was religion discussed during Bush's campain? Or at the debates? Hm...we must be talking about two different elections Clem. National Security was the issue. Besides John Kerry and George Bush believe in the same religion so nice try.
All experts say Bush was re-elected because of National Security. You are in denial. John Kerry had no plan whatsoever for fighting terror and neither does any other democrat for that matter.
Do you have a better technique for fighting terror?? Since you are so quick to critisize Bush, I am sure you do.....what is it guys?
When was religion discussed during Bush's campain? Or at the debates? Hm...we must be talking about two different elections Clem. National Security was the issue. Besides John Kerry and George Bush believe in the same religion so nice try.
All experts say Bush was re-elected because of National Security. You are in denial. John Kerry had no plan whatsoever for fighting terror and neither does any other democrat for that matter.
Do you have a better technique for fighting terror?? Since you are so quick to critisize Bush, I am sure you do.....what is it guys?
Last edited:
You said..
Besides John Kerry and George Bush believe in the same religion so nice try.
Kerry is roman Catholic. Bush most certainly is not .
As for capturing a mass killer, is that the reason we went to Iraq now? It's so hard to keep track of.
Personally i would have rather caught the mass murderer who did it to us.
However since The Bush's are in bed with the Saudi's and the Binladens that could never happen.
Besides John Kerry and George Bush believe in the same religion so nice try.
Kerry is roman Catholic. Bush most certainly is not .
As for capturing a mass killer, is that the reason we went to Iraq now? It's so hard to keep track of.
Personally i would have rather caught the mass murderer who did it to us.
However since The Bush's are in bed with the Saudi's and the Binladens that could never happen.
All experts say Bush was re-elected because of National Security. You are in denial. John Kerry had no plan whatsoever for fighting terror and neither does any other democrat for that matter.
Do you have a better technique for fighting terror?? Since you are so quick to critisize Bush, I am sure you do.....what is it guys?
Whats the latest on his pursuit of Bin Laden or has he given up on capturing the mastermind behind the biggest terrorist strike against the U.S. in history? Is Bin laden in iraq is that why we are there? I thought we were there because of WMD's but now your telling me we are they because we needed to remove a brutal killer from his throne, so I guess next we will go to the Sudan where 7o,000 people have been killed recently by the regime and over 6 million are displaced from their homeland.
Do you have a better technique for fighting terror?? Since you are so quick to critisize Bush, I am sure you do.....what is it guys?
Whats the latest on his pursuit of Bin Laden or has he given up on capturing the mastermind behind the biggest terrorist strike against the U.S. in history? Is Bin laden in iraq is that why we are there? I thought we were there because of WMD's but now your telling me we are they because we needed to remove a brutal killer from his throne, so I guess next we will go to the Sudan where 7o,000 people have been killed recently by the regime and over 6 million are displaced from their homeland.
Bin Laden?...He's probably in Pakistan...a country that our troops are not allowed to enter. Lots of people now say he is in Iran - another country where we have no troops. Are we to invade those countries??? What technique would you use to capture him Master??? It's easy to point fingers then offer no alternative ideas. Typical liberal.
I also like how you avoided my question by ignoring it and asking a different question. Nice touch.
I also like how you avoided my question by ignoring it and asking a different question. Nice touch.
you stay golden, chuckie. stay golden. don't let these liberals get you down.
...just clear up a term you keep using wrong though -- technically 1 mass grave would hold the dead of a bunch of people. so, i don't know how many actual mass graves there were or the cadaver per mass grave ratio, but it's mathematically impossible for there to be 400,000 mass graves.
i'll take a guess and say there are maybe a few hundred mass graves. so if you are interested in accuracy, you can replace "mass graves" with "dead people" or replace '400,000' with ....well, with some number less than that.
carry on though. any progress on getting that job at the baghdad px yet?
...just clear up a term you keep using wrong though -- technically 1 mass grave would hold the dead of a bunch of people. so, i don't know how many actual mass graves there were or the cadaver per mass grave ratio, but it's mathematically impossible for there to be 400,000 mass graves.
i'll take a guess and say there are maybe a few hundred mass graves. so if you are interested in accuracy, you can replace "mass graves" with "dead people" or replace '400,000' with ....well, with some number less than that.
carry on though. any progress on getting that job at the baghdad px yet?
Oh ok we will play semantics on the mass grave thing. How desperate!! LOL!! :mj07:
I hope you are wise enough to think about what you just said.
400,000 graves = BAD
Hundreds of mass graves sites totalling up to 400,000 individual graves = NOT AS BAD
Typical liberal logic. Bill Clinton would be proud of you!!
I hope you are wise enough to think about what you just said.
400,000 graves = BAD
Hundreds of mass graves sites totalling up to 400,000 individual graves = NOT AS BAD
Typical liberal logic. Bill Clinton would be proud of you!!
Last edited:
