No mate. Just stating facts and making logical points. :0074
Are You are getting aroused by this is a logical point?
:facepalm:
No mate. Just stating facts and making logical points. :0074
where do people get this crap about "Hunting"......the second ammendment dosent mention anything about hunting.....nobody is talking about "hunting".......but it does mention a "Miliitia".......why ?.....because it is talking about military weapons......or weapons for a military purpose......read the second ammendment
Pray tell why civilians need be armed with military weapons? Maybe this had some merit 200 years ago, but not today
What ?
The 2nd A wasn't written as a disposable Amendment based on the issues vs. The Kings Army or our own tyranical govt. Any other writings from the Bill of Rights from 200 years ago maybe we can disregard?
No one will convince me that civilians need to possess hard-core military weaponry. The only problem that I see with limiting certain weapons is the foot-in-the-door theory, meaning where will government restrictions end if we let them start. Presumably, this is why the NRA operates like they do.I get both sides of it. Just feel that some things need to be taken off the street just like I feel airport screening needs to be tight and profiling should be utilized to keep planes from falling out of the sky at the hands of terrorists.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.
