Geez That tells me alot The same people that elected Bush for President! Who cares Idiot!! Shut the f--k up
question and lets keep it clean no fights
- Thread starter fletcher
- Start date
Also same people that said Ok last year should play USC instead of Auburn We all know that was a joke!! Auburn would have definately given a better effort!
dlvlsu said:
Thats about the extent of your intelligence, summed up into one sentence. This country is a democracy, and its only fair the people get to see what they want to see.
Do yourself a favor, GET A JOB, and buy yourself an XBOX, then buy ncaa 2005. Then you can simulate the game between Auburn and ND. When ND whoops Auburn on the video game, maybe your simple intellect will be satisfied. Then you can touch yourself and go to bed. :s4:
Boy your a real genius!! Got to insult someone when your proven wrong! I know more about football than you will ever know! Your just like a smart ass yankee think you know everything and you dont know jack s--t!! Only kids play with toys dumb f--k!! I aint no kid!! Who the hell is talking about wanting to see this and that?? What the hell is that?? I am talking about winning money Dumb F--K!!
dlvlsu said:
Are you always this angry? Please put the keyboard down, you're absolutely embarrassing... You haven't done one thing to support your argument except saying my DAD can beat up your DAD. Go away.
SEC most bowl games played in NCAA history
SEC most bowl games won in NCAA history
Should I go on?
SEC most bowl games won in NCAA history
Should I go on?
no relevance to THIS year. Period. When ND was 6-6 last year, did I go around bragging about how good they were because of PAST national championships? Nah, because it doesnt matter. Maybe Auburn was better than ND last year, hell alot of teams were. Not this year.
I dont care HOW many times you can drop the F bomb in one sentence, it doesnt make you right. On the contrary, it makes you look backwards, uneducated, and of a LOWER CLASS. You probably get on the internet at your county library you scumbag. Get a career.
I dont care HOW many times you can drop the F bomb in one sentence, it doesnt make you right. On the contrary, it makes you look backwards, uneducated, and of a LOWER CLASS. You probably get on the internet at your county library you scumbag. Get a career.
dlvlsu said:
I turn to insults when proven wrong? I believe you were the one to counter my ESPN fan poll by calling Americans idiots for voting for Bush. Nice comeback el Retardado
Dice34 said:
Here is my answer. USC would have easier time in other conferences because they don't know how to play USC's style of football. USC would have an advantage. Carroll defensively would have an easier time as DC as well in other conf.
I honestly would have to say the Pac 10. My #1 reason for this is Pac 10 teams play tough schedule from start to finish and play on the road. Other conf. don't. Also in the Pac 10 so many teams have explosive offenses. The reason it makes it difficult is if an offense is on fire, you can easily get down 10-20pts in a hurry in a football game. No matter who the opoonent is. USC obviously is on top of the CFB world last 3 years, yet USC ALWAYS has tougher time in conf. play.
Big 10 I might put #1 as well. They play strong OOC. This year I have the Big 10 #1. I like at Ohio St. and they always play so many home games. That is not difficult at all. Imagine USC playing all those home games. Offenses are not great in this conf. but getting better. If Penn St. was better the last 3 years, I think I def. put Big 10 #1.
ACC would be up there if FSU and Miami get their act together. Miami needs an offense and FSU needs and offense. Again, USC would have advantage having a high octane offense in this conf. You also miss out on 3 teams every year since 12 team conf.
SEC. If TN and FL were better I put them #1. This conf. doesn't know how to play offense and has VERY poor QB play. USC IMO would have the easier time in the SEC vs Big 10 and ACC. Especially when you consider SEC teams playing JOKE OOC schedule and all those home games. Plus it is 12 team conf. so you miss out on 3 teams every year. IF TN and FL get their acts together, I would say SEC "conf" play is the toughest in the country. But maybe not the toughest SCHEDULES.
Like I said many times. Each conf. has their strengths and weaknesses. Some people like to only focus on elite teams in each conf. Ohers completely ingore OOC schedules. Some think there is no difference between playing home games and road games.
Remember, you asked about USC. USC the last 4 years strength on defense is stopping the run. MOST of these conf. love to pound the ball. Remember that!
LOL couldnt stop fresno offense(run or pass) or nd offense certainly couldnt stop best teams in SEC offense. Amazing what some people think and believe. You telling me that USC plays a brand of football nobody has seen or can stop? LOL Geez what a fantasy world!!! Spurrier was doing same stuff in early 90's in the SEC It got stopped!! Only Pac-10 offense that could move at will on SEC is USC thats it!! Every SEC offense except maybe Ole Miss could move on USC defense. Look at ARKansas they suck at the time they played USC but ran up and down the field. Ok and as far as proving this and that if you study,watch, and learn about sports you should pick up or see the things like everybody else!! Unless your just plain stupid or close minded!! Personal attacks are ignorant! so who are you talking about?? LOL
dlvlsu said:
Oklahoma last year was better than ANY SEC team last year OR this year. Look what happened to them. No team in the SEC can play USC as closely as ND did because they CANT MOVE THE BALL like ND can. You cant beat USC with a smash mouth running game like the deep south teams have. Beating USC is all about play at the QB position, more than any other spot. Fresno was ahead until their QB starting completing passes to the trojans in the second half. ND was leading until the final ticks because of OUTSTANDING QB PLAY. Who is the QB in the SEC that has a CHANCE to play well against them? Right, nobody. OKlahoma tried pounding the ball last season instead of allowing White to work and they got demolished by USC. Sad to say, but some mediocre PAC 10 teams have better QBs than SEC teams, so I dont see how an SEC team could stay close to the trojans. Impossible. Imagine Brody Coyle trying to pass against USC :mj07:
While SEC teams do play a more physical style than most PAC 10 teams, that does not necessarily mean the final score would be reflected. Good, physical defenses tire in the second half when pisspoor passing attacks fail to move the football. See: Notre Dame vs. USC 2003. One of the most opportunistic, play making defenses I have ever watched got rung up for 40 points. Why, because they played poorly? No, the game was relatively close in the first half, something LSU, Georgia, Florida, or Bama could probably accomplish. But in the 2nd half, the offense kept going 3 and out and turning the ball over giving USC short fields and wearing out our awesome defense.
I dont think some of you realize how well USC's defense has played in the 2nd half of games.
Last edited:
Carroll said he isn't worried at all about the USC defense. In his press conferrence Carroll brought up excellent pts. He gave ton of credit to FSU coaching staff and said they are very good team. Which they are. 2nd, Carroll said FSU offense ran the ball well few times on a drive but that was it. Then FSU would have some success with intermediate passing game, then that was it. Then FSU would have success dumping pass to RB, then that was it. Then Carroll pointed out USC D started the 3q really well and in the 2h special teams killed USC. FSU had 2 TD's scored from USC 28 and USC 15. Not the USC defense fault. Carroll said be blames himself for not adjusting fast enough.
If you look at things closer, USC D wasn't NEARLY as bad as people made it out to be against a VERY GOOD Fresno St. squad who played really well that night. Don't forget, USC is also very banged up on D.
Something Carroll didn't mention was USC D forcing Fresno St. offense to fumble 3 times in the 1h and FSU recovering all 3 fumbles back. USC D excels at forcing teams to turn the ball over and FSU got lucky in 1h. But their luck ran out as they turned it over often in 2h.
If you look at things closer, USC D wasn't NEARLY as bad as people made it out to be against a VERY GOOD Fresno St. squad who played really well that night. Don't forget, USC is also very banged up on D.
Something Carroll didn't mention was USC D forcing Fresno St. offense to fumble 3 times in the 1h and FSU recovering all 3 fumbles back. USC D excels at forcing teams to turn the ball over and FSU got lucky in 1h. But their luck ran out as they turned it over often in 2h.
GEEZZZZZ I realize what I am dealing with now never mind!!
Whatever you think is right!! Its amazing LOL Good to know somethings in this world makes you appreciate other things!!
Whatever you think is right!! Its amazing LOL Good to know somethings in this world makes you appreciate other things!!
dlvlsu
Registered User Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 80
"Wash St, oregon St, washington, Arizona, Arizona St, Cal, ucla,Stanford That sounds alot worse there!! and all those teams except Az St And maybe cal wouldnt win 3 games in the SEC ."
This may be the absolute most ridiculous, uniformed and totally assinine statement ever made at Madjack's. If you believe that none of these teams would win three games in the SEC you are living in a fantasy world of your own creation. You wonder why Southerners are perceived by others often times as hillbillies, red necks, uneducated, and basically toothless - you are a perfect example of why people would think that. You claim to live this wonderful upscale life yet you make absurd statements like the above which destroys any credibility you could ever have. You are either incredibly immature or just plain stupid. You cannot go around saying stupid things without looking stupid.
One more chance do you really believe -
"Wash St, oregon St, washington, Arizona, Arizona St, Cal, ucla,Stanford That sounds alot worse there!! and all those teams except Az St And maybe cal wouldnt win 3 games in the SEC ."
Or will you admit you may have exaggerated slightly?
Registered User Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 80
"Wash St, oregon St, washington, Arizona, Arizona St, Cal, ucla,Stanford That sounds alot worse there!! and all those teams except Az St And maybe cal wouldnt win 3 games in the SEC ."
This may be the absolute most ridiculous, uniformed and totally assinine statement ever made at Madjack's. If you believe that none of these teams would win three games in the SEC you are living in a fantasy world of your own creation. You wonder why Southerners are perceived by others often times as hillbillies, red necks, uneducated, and basically toothless - you are a perfect example of why people would think that. You claim to live this wonderful upscale life yet you make absurd statements like the above which destroys any credibility you could ever have. You are either incredibly immature or just plain stupid. You cannot go around saying stupid things without looking stupid.
One more chance do you really believe -
"Wash St, oregon St, washington, Arizona, Arizona St, Cal, ucla,Stanford That sounds alot worse there!! and all those teams except Az St And maybe cal wouldnt win 3 games in the SEC ."
Or will you admit you may have exaggerated slightly?
