SEC dominance

Stuman

Banned
Forum Member
Nov 5, 2002
800
0
0
Memphrica, Tennessee
Scott you always bring up the OOC schedule issue and no matter how many times someone tries to explain it to you, you obviously will not ever listen or try to understand. The SEC doesn't "have to" schedule powerhouse OOC opponents, unlike USC. Why not? I trust that you know the reason Scott. We have told you numerous times.

How could LSU possibly have cheated their way into the NC game with such a weak OOC schedule? :rolleyes:

And why do you feel sorry for the SEC fans that are forced to watch such weak OOC games? SEC fans can't get enough of it, no matter who they play. A season of ticket sales in the SEC will easily DOUBLE that of the Pac10. How is that possible with such lousy opponents in and out of conference? Again, I trust that you know the answers, although you will never admit the glaring truth.

Stuman
 

Cie

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 30, 2003
22,391
253
0
New Orleans
Scott

Why don't you take all the money that you have made and buy yourself a piece of ass??? I feel that paying for it is better than getting none.

:weed:
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
Stuman

I think you fail to realize LSU was in the Sugar Bowl because they got extrememly lucky that the teams on USC schedule tanked and did everything possible to keep USC out of the NC game. WSU losing with frosh qb in final minute, ND losing last game, Hawaii losing last game, OSU losing prior to USC, UCLA losing prior to playing USC, the list goes on and on. Oh yeah, how about LSU beating Ole Miss because OLE Miss reliable kicker missed 2 field goals and beating UGA when getting extremely outplayed and the UGA kicker missing "multiple FG's. USC is not a lucky team at all, they had to earn everything this year and never once got a break. I agreed LSU deserved to be in the Sugar Bowl and OU did not. However, LSU would not have been in the Sugar Bowl with out all this bad luck coming against USC. Remember, LSU was "only" .15 ahead of USC in the BCS. That is extreme luck my friend. Anything and everything outside of USC's control happened, and happened against USC. EVERYTHING! It was quite amazing, but nothing USC could do about it except blame themselves for losing to CAL in triple OT and missing the FG. Too bad USC was not so fortunate as LSU to have the CAL kicker miss just one FG. In fact he made a 52 yarder in that game. But I am not going to complain about winning a split NC in a clearly rebuilding year at USC. USC should repeat next year.

Remember, I said LSU was lucky to be in the Sugar Bowl ahead of USC, but LSU earned their victory over OU and IMO deserved to be there over OU. OU in no way belonged there and they clearly were not an elite team.

Cie Grant

Get some class.
 
Last edited:

scott

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 23, 2003
71
0
0
oxford, ms
Scott, i am ashamed to share the same name with you. All that you do is complain, you have USC little man syndrome. The fact is that every school in the conference plays 8 games a year in which almost anything can happen. Other than 3 schools, you will hardly ever see a line over a td in the SEC. Why? b/c anything can happen, every team has that much talent. USC is easily far more superior than any other team in the PAC 10, thats why they are always favored by so many points. If they played a SEC schedule, they would have the same lines as Geogia, Florida, Tenn. and LSU. Honestly, the conference has so much talent, that when lsu can go 7-1 in conference, and then beat georgia again in atlanta convincingly, that is pretty remarkable. Say LSU and USC were to have played in the Sugar bowl, what do you think the outcome would of been? Keep in mind, Oklahoma had one of the best offenses in the country, and LSU absolutely dominated them. Against a defense with that much speed, give me your honest prediction?
 

mansa_musa

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 11, 2001
257
0
0
Las Vegas, NV USA
SEC fans

SEC fans

I'm going to try to explain to you all why Pac 10 fans love their conference. I'm going to try to have some class about this! In the course, I will have to call on some of your statements, but, please dont take it personal.

The SEC doesn't "have to" schedule powerhouse OOC opponents, unlike USC. Why not?

That's my question too why not?! Since when is playing tough opponents a sign of weakness! If there is one thing I can bet on every year, it's that the best team in the Pac 10 is going to lose to somebody in the conference. Even the OOC losses serve a purpose, because in conf play the Pac 10 is full of live dogs who need wins to get bowl bids. The Pac 10 prepares itself by playing tough OOC games!

there have been FOUR DIFFERENT SEC teams win the national championship: Alabama, Florida, Tennessee, and LSU

Since 1992! The national title only means (allegedly!) that you had the best team that season, not the best conference. When will KU, MSU, Ole Miss, Vandy or S Carolina win that conf.? Never!

On the other hand, since 1991, every Pac 10 team has finished ranked in the top 10 by the coaches and the AP polls. Since 1992, every Pac 10 team (except Cal) has won or shared the conf. title, and only one has gone undefeated in conf play (UCLA '98)! That sounds more like beating up on each other to me. Each of the 5 SEC teams mentioned in the previous paragraph can claim neither of those accomplishments in the last 12 yrs! Theyr'e not beating up on anybody! You cant separate the top of the SEC from the bottom--they are all in the conf together!

Honestly, the conference has so much talent, that when lsu can go 7-1 in conference, and then beat georgia again in atlanta convincingly, that is pretty remarkable.


I could be wrong, but, I think LSU was the only one of those SEC national title teams that lost a conf game. That would mean that the SEC was averaging an undefeated team every 3 yrs til LSU failed to keep that streak alive. To me, that negates any argument that the SEC beats up on each other. That tells me that the strong are beating up on the weak. And since the weak teams aren't preparing themselves OOC, things wont change.

2 yrs ago, Cal went 1-11 w no conf wins. In that season, the Golden Bears played 4 different D1 conf championship teams. The next season, buoyed by the tough schedule from the previous season, they win a game @ Mich St & begin to turn around their program. This yr they beat the best team in the country w a 1st yr starting QB & manage to win a bowl game. Read into that what you will.


A season of ticket sales in the SEC will easily DOUBLE that of the Pac10. How is that possible with such lousy opponents in and out of conference?

Well, people used to flock to watch Christians being thrown to the lions. Other people used to flock to watch Black people being burned at the stake & dragged through the streets. I suspect those are the type of people who enjoy watching SEC teams play the Citadel, LA-Monroe, FAMU, Mid Tenn, Troy St, UCF & App St.

And I didnt know they played football in the stands. What do the ticket sales prove?

In my opinion the SEC has some great programs at the top, but the entire conference is not really tough. Pac 10 fans can look forward to upsets. The fans of Oregon St have just as much hope for a conference title next yr as the fans of Oregon. Cal will have some hope of their first conference title in I dont know how long. Those things dont really exist for the majority of SEC teams.
 

Mr Hockey

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 17, 2003
2,098
0
0
Just a little correction to your post but Mississippi was right in the thick of the SEC title race this past season & with a win over LSU, they could have been in the SEC Title Game.
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
mansa_musa

GREAT POST :thumb:

Add that to my other posts, nobody, i mean NOBODY, from the SEC has any type of argument against the Pac 10. Wow, you really did a great job. I enjoyed reading it and it was very well written. Next year in this forum, there will be nobody saying how the SEC is superior to every conference. We exposed that myth. In addition, nobody will be putting down the Pac 10. Thanks again for posting.

FIGHT ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

Mr Hockey

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 17, 2003
2,098
0
0
Scott with every post you just show your true my dick is bigger then yours syndrome.

So some of the comments about the SEC is the fact that certain teams never have a shot at a conference title but in the Pac 10 more teams have hope.

Well lets flip this around & say what does that say about the level of Pac 10 play if any team could just come up & win. In my opinion that doesn't sound like conference stability but more so conference unstability.

Scott not many people take you seriously here & it isn't because your info about your team for betting purposes isn't good but because you are biased & that has been proven time & time again.
 

Stuman

Banned
Forum Member
Nov 5, 2002
800
0
0
Memphrica, Tennessee
Mr Hockey said:
Just a little correction to your post but Mississippi was right in the thick of the SEC title race this past season & with a win over LSU, they could have been in the SEC Title Game.

To add to Mr Hockey's point:

Ole Miss has 6 count 'em 6 SEC conference titles and 3 national championships! Its been a long time since those stats, but it exists nonetheless! Mansa - Never is an awefully long time! I simply posted info on Ole Miss because I happen to know that off the top of my head. I'm sure that UK, MSU, SC, and Vandy ALL have similar stats to their name, but quite frankly, doing the research to throw it in your homer faces is not worth my time!
 

Skipper

BITCH!!
Forum Member
Feb 19, 2003
4,725
40
48
Knoxville
Mansu,

In reference to your post, everything you just described points to one thing

THAT THE PAC 10 IS MEDIOCRE!!

You and Scott both, THANKS FOR PLAYING!!
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top