Stock Market Thread - ALL COMBINED

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
105,023
1,541
113
70
home
Spongetech is all wet

Ex-attorney claims forgery

By KAJA WHITEHOUSE
Last Updated: 2:12 AM, September 22, 2009
Posted: 2:12 AM, September 22, 2009
<FORM id=HiddenInfo name=HiddenInfo></FORM></IMG></IMG></IMG></IMG></IMG></IMG></IMG></IMG>
A former attorney for SpongeTech, a New York company known for making soap-filled sponges it sells through infomercials, says the company forged dozens of legal documents tied to its issuance of stock.
SpongeTech, which boasts that sales skyrocketed 900 percent this year, received international attention earlier this month when tennis star Serena Williams screamed at a US Open tennis championship line judge in front of one of its ads.
But on Friday the company's stock was tagged with the financial equivalent of a scarlet letter: The letter "e" was appended to its ticker for failing to file financial results with the SEC. The company says it had to restate its last two years of financial results because of a problem with its auditor, and as a result is late with its annual filing.


The accusations of forgery and "identity theft" come from Norfolk, Conn. attorney Joel Pensley, who said in a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission that he was "dumbfounded" to learn that his name was being used in "as many as one hundred opinion letters for various shareholders."
Pensley told the SEC that he would not have written such letters. "I question the legality of the transactions," he wrote.
A copy of the letter obtained by The Post shows it was addressed to Robert Khuzami, head of the SEC's enforcement division.
Neither Pensley nor the SEC responded to repeated requests for comment, but Pensley's business partner, Maureen Abato, confirmed the letter's authenticity.
"Why would they want to run that risk? I don't get it," said Abato, who is based in Brooklyn and whose name and address is on the letterhead with Pensley's. "It raises questions about their whole operation."
Abato said that after learning about the documents, their firm, Pensley & Abato, sent a cease-and-desist letter to SpongeTech. She said SpongeTech CFO Steve Moskowitz claimed the company had authority to use the law firm's name in the legal documents, but agreed to stop.
In June SpongeTech projected a whopping $50 million in revenue for the fiscal year ended in May, up from $5.6 million for 2008. But those numbers have raised questions within the industry.
Michael Popovsky, CEO of LA-based sponge maker Spongeables, a SpongeTech rival, scoffs at the idea that a company that sells sponges with soap in them can generate $50 million in annual revenue.
"Impossible," he said. "Categorically not."
Popovsky said industry sales tend to be in the $5 million to $10 million range.
Among Popovsky's biggest customers are national retailers such as Wal-Mart, CVS/Caremark and Rite-Aid.
SpongeTech, by contrast, lists among its biggest customers several lesser-known companies, like New Century Media, which a SpongeTech spokesman said is "based in Europe," declining to provide further specifics. Another company, SA Trading, is based in Caracas, Venezuela, he said. The only US record of an SA Trading shows a now-defunct company incorporated in Illinois.
It's also unclear how many shares SpongeTech currently has outstanding. Prior to its last quarterly filing, the company had 1.2 billion shares outstanding, putting it on par with eBay and overshadowing shares outstanding at both Apple and Pfizer combined.
"I am shocked and aggrieved that my name and reputation could be sullied in this manner," Pensley said in the letter to Khuzami. Pensley said in the letter that he learned of the forgery from New Jersey stock services company Olde Monmouth Stock Transfer Co.
A letter from Olde Monmouth's attorney, Richard Fox, also addressed to Khuzami, said the forged documents relate to stock issued to RM Enterprises, SpongeTech's largest shareholder. RM Enterprises is controlled by the company's executives, including Moskowitz and CEO Michael Metter, according to SEC filings. Metter recently denied to The Post that he's a director or officer of the company.
Fox, when reached by The Post, said he couldn't comment before abruptly hanging up the phone. kaja.whitehouse@nypost.com
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
105,023
1,541
113
70
home
SpongeTech? Delivery Systems Cancels Reverse Stock Split



  • Press Release
  • Source: SpongeTech? Delivery Systems, Inc.
  • On Tuesday September 22, 2009, 8:04 am EDT
    • <FORM id=media-buzz-top class=buzz method=post action=http://buzz.yahoo.com/vote/><INPUT value=y_finance type=hidden name=publisherurn> <INPUT value=yahoo_finance/553549589 type=hidden name=guid> <INPUT value=/article/y_finance/yahoo_finance/553549589 type=hidden name=.done> <INPUT value=article type=hidden name=assettype> <INPUT value=1 type=hidden name=votetype> <INPUT value=orion type=hidden name=from> <INPUT value=57454 type=hidden name=key> <INPUT value=SQWZhGjhwkG type=hidden name=.crumb><BUTTON type=submit>Buzz up! 0</BUTTON> </FORM>
    • Print
<!-- ./end of article hd -->
<!-- /.mod.related-companies -->NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--SpongeTech? Delivery Systems, Inc. (?SpongeTech?) ?The Smarter Sponge??, (OTCBB: SPNGE - News) today announced that its Board of Directors has decided to cancel its previously announced reverse stock split until after the Form 10-K for the Company?s fiscal year 2009 has been filed.
<!-- Article Related Media -->CEO Michael Metter said, ?We originally planned for the reverse stock split to take effect after the filing of our Form 10-K for fiscal 2009 to give our shareholders the opportunity to evaluate our financial performance and growth prospects first. In light of the delay in filing, we have decided that to proceed with the reverse stock split would not be in the best interests of our shareholders.?
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
SpongeTech? Delivery Systems Cancels Reverse Stock Split



  • Press Release
  • Source: SpongeTech? Delivery Systems, Inc.
  • On Tuesday September 22, 2009, 8:04 am EDT
    • <FORM id=media-buzz-top class=buzz method=post action=http://buzz.yahoo.com/vote/><INPUT value=y_finance type=hidden name=publisherurn> <INPUT value=yahoo_finance/553549589 type=hidden name=guid> <INPUT value=/article/y_finance/yahoo_finance/553549589 type=hidden name=.done> <INPUT value=article type=hidden name=assettype> <INPUT value=1 type=hidden name=votetype> <INPUT value=orion type=hidden name=from> <INPUT value=57454 type=hidden name=key> <INPUT value=SQWZhGjhwkG type=hidden name=.crumb><BUTTON type=submit>Buzz up! 0</BUTTON> </FORM>
    • Print
<!-- ./end of article hd -->
<!-- /.mod.related-companies -->NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--SpongeTech? Delivery Systems, Inc. (?SpongeTech?) ?The Smarter Sponge??, (OTCBB: SPNGE - News) today announced that its Board of Directors has decided to cancel its previously announced reverse stock split until after the Form 10-K for the Company?s fiscal year 2009 has been filed.
<!-- Article Related Media -->CEO Michael Metter said, ?We originally planned for the reverse stock split to take effect after the filing of our Form 10-K for fiscal 2009 to give our shareholders the opportunity to evaluate our financial performance and growth prospects first. In light of the delay in filing, we have decided that to proceed with the reverse stock split would not be in the best interests of our shareholders.?

Gee, who would of guessed that a reverse split would not be in the best interest of the stockholders! At least they let the shorts escape.
 

vinnie

la vita ? buona
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2000
59,163
212
0
Here
Ten Big Companies That Are Veering Toward Bankruptcy:0corn


Despite a few green shoots in the economy and a rocketing stock market, many large companies are still struggling to avoid bankruptcy.

A new report by Audit Integrity identifies some high-profile names "that have the highest probability of declaring bankruptcy among publicly traded firms."

Which companies appear the worst off? We took the list and removed any company with a market cap under $3 billion. We then ranked the remaining names by a simple measure of the market's perceived bankruptcy risk - Market Cap (MC) divided by Enterprise Value (EV). The less MC vs. EV, the less residual shareholders' value (above what debt holders can claim) the market is pricing-in for the company. Thus a lower MC/EV means the market thinks the company is more likely to go bankrupt.

1. Hertz

When you have tons of debt financing your fleet of cars, falling rental demand really hurts.

While the company raised new capital in May for some breathing room, Fitch and Moody?s actually cut their ratings for the company in July.

Ignoring the downgrade, shares kept rallying and are now at over five times the March $2 low. Best of luck.

Market Cap (MC)/Enterprise Value (EV) = 32%

2. Textron

What a tough time to be selling business jets.

Textron wrote down $2.3 billion its backlog this year after it canceled a new jet design, and demand for its other aircraft-related offerings has plummeted.

Shareholders may be heartened by the company?s ability to push back some debt maturities lately, but deteriorating credit quality at the company?s leasing arm makes the outlook uncertain at best.

MC/EV=39%

3. Sprint Nextel

Sprint Nextel is bleeding customers, and could lose as many as 4.4 million net post-paid subscribers this year.

This is a huge problem when you have large amounts of maturing debt over the next few years.

A recent Deutsche Telekom acquisition rumor offered some hope, but that appears to have faded. Facing a difficult road ahead on its own, the company better keep its lawyers on speed-dial.

MC/EV=41%

4. Macy's

Does anyone even shop at department stores anymore?

Same store sales will likely keep falling at Macy?s right through 2009. With $2.4 billion of maturing debt over the next five years, the company is trying to cut costs, and has already reduced its dividend.

Hopefully the US consumer will bounce back soon, and actually want to shop at Macy's.

MC/EV=47%

5. Mylan

In a classic case of management empire building, Mylan overpaid big time when it bought Merck?s generic business back in 2007 and is now stuck with $5 billion of long-term debt as a result.

From 2007 ? 2008, the company lost over $1.3 billion very much due to goodwill write-downs.

While the company could earn $300 million this year, they?ll have to earn far more than that in the future to make their debt manageable.

MC/EV=51%

6. Goodyear

Demand for Goodyear tires has sunk, and the company is saddled with massive debt and pension obligations.

It doesn?t help that The United Steelworkers union prevents the company from proper cost control by forcing factories to stay open.

Shareholders have to wonder how much value will be left of the company after bondholders and the union members have their way.

MC/EV=53%

7. CBS

Weak advertising and falling license fees have sent CBS's earnings off a cliff in 2009.

If they remain depressed for too long, the company could have trouble refinancing $3.2 billion of debt coming due over the next five years.

It will really come down to whether or not CBS?s earnings collapse is merely cyclical, or the result of structural trend whereby traditional TV is dying.

As a business blog, we can't help but feel partly guilty here.

MC/EV=55%

8. Advanced Micro Devices

When will AMD actually make money again? The question is becoming more important by the day since it carries over $5 billion in long-term debt.

After losing almost $3 billion from 2007 ? 2008, analysts expect the company to lose more money in 2009 and 2010.

While the shares rallied from their February $2 low, they still appear stuck in a long-term down trend from $40 highs way back in 2006.

MC/EV=55%

9. Las Vegas Sands

Las Vegas Sands over-expanded and over-levered in the last few years and now has over $10 billion in debt to deal with.

Despite jumping 13 times from their March low, Las Vegas Sands shares still face an uphill battle.

Conditions in Las Vegas are horrible, Asian expansion isn?t enough, and if this lasts too long then LVS will end up in bankruptcy court looking like it bit off more than it can chew.

MC/EV=60%

10. Interpublic Group

As one of the largest advertising and marketing companies in the world, IPG was slammed by the global recession.

As the company?s CEO said during recent second quarter results, the downturn ?is proving steeper and more lasting than expected?.

Revenues have fallen double digits and the company?s exposure to General Motors as its largest client hasn?t helped.

MC/EV=80%
 

vinnie

la vita ? buona
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2000
59,163
212
0
Here
:sadwave:

oops.gif
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
I new If I sold out all my BEE it would run more. Just seems to work that way. But when you can make 72c a share on a 1.50 stock in two days. It,s hard to wait.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top