- Sep 25, 2009
- 2,474
- 395
- 83
SUGAR BOWL IN GAME THREAD
- Thread starter MadJack
- Start date
Michigan was outplayed all night. Too bad it ended with a BS call on a TD catch.
And he had his arms underneath the ball, not his hands.
And he had his arms underneath the ball, not his hands.
Gotta a chuckle out of that one........ If ever there was a loss you could hang on the coach,this was it. What a puussy ass douche.
I thought it was a catch and the issue was whether he came down in bounds. I would have ruled incomplete live but on review, no way you have enough evidence to overturn it. Can't tell if his elbow hit in bounds just before rest of body hit out of bounds....but he did catch the ball.
BTW, I had Va Tech +3 and Under, so went 1-0-1....
BTW, I had Va Tech +3 and Under, so went 1-0-1....
Still not sure how VT and Georgia both managed to lose games they should have easily won.....
Also, so sick of this awful OT system. There is no playoff, why do we need OT??? I don't get it and at least play sudden death or a version of it. College OT is terrible.....
Also, so sick of this awful OT system. There is no playoff, why do we need OT??? I don't get it and at least play sudden death or a version of it. College OT is terrible.....
his foot and elbow hit inbounds
his hand and arm were under the ball, the ball never moved when it barely hit the ground
he maintained possession throughout his roll on the sidelines
the call on the field was a catch
i have no idea why it was so hard to rule it as called on the field....wait....i do....jim fuking fogeltance and the rest of the pac-10 crew doing the game are fuking horrible.
i read about 20 responses here and got about 12-15 catches with 5-8 no catches.......
isnt the definition of undisputable evidence that the ruling on the field was 100% incorrect????
if 20 people saw the same play and at least 18 dont think it was wrong there is no way they should overturn a call......no matter what they THINK they can assume on a replay.....heck, both announcers thought it was a catch.
add vt moneyline to the list of fuck jobs in the last 4 days.
in the end......add dipshit beamer to the list of ass-hat coaches who coach their teams to losses (richt and shaw) with their terrible decisions and/or play calling.....185 yards of offense for mich and they win????
sickening
his hand and arm were under the ball, the ball never moved when it barely hit the ground
he maintained possession throughout his roll on the sidelines
the call on the field was a catch
i have no idea why it was so hard to rule it as called on the field....wait....i do....jim fuking fogeltance and the rest of the pac-10 crew doing the game are fuking horrible.
i read about 20 responses here and got about 12-15 catches with 5-8 no catches.......
isnt the definition of undisputable evidence that the ruling on the field was 100% incorrect????
if 20 people saw the same play and at least 18 dont think it was wrong there is no way they should overturn a call......no matter what they THINK they can assume on a replay.....heck, both announcers thought it was a catch.
add vt moneyline to the list of fuck jobs in the last 4 days.
in the end......add dipshit beamer to the list of ass-hat coaches who coach their teams to losses (richt and shaw) with their terrible decisions and/or play calling.....185 yards of offense for mich and they win????
sickening
That means nothing, Brad Nessler was obviously drunk. He called one missed FG wide left when it was right. He also doesn't realize West Virginia is its own state and not in Virginia.
Anyway, the receiver didn't have possession until he was out of bounds. That was clear.
i thought it was crystal clear that his foot and elbow hit in bounds and while the ball may have glanced the ground (the only debateable point) it was already in his possession and never moved once it may have glanced off the ground
again......doesnt this prove the point that the call on the field should stand???
i'd be sitting here saying the same thing if the call on the field was called it incomplete.....no way to overturn it as the replay wasnt totally conclusive either way
I had v tech and hate to admit It but that wasn't a catch
