- Feb 12, 2000
- 10,652
- 39
- 48
- 50
I don't pay attention to every post, but were there people here actually for the "stimulus" checks by Bush last year?
I thought I remembered at least the majority of the board heavily against them because they wouldn't do anything to "stimulate" the economy.
As far as the new "stimulus" plan: what does more government jobs (on top of the 15%+ of the total job market we have now) being paid for out of the tax-payers pockets to attempt to artificially prop something up have to do with "stimulating" the economy?
Desperate times sometimes calls for biting the bullet and having hard times. We are somehow under the belief that we, as people and as a country, should never have hard times. It's great when we don't, but we have to learn to dig deep and ride the rough patches, too.
I thought I remembered at least the majority of the board heavily against them because they wouldn't do anything to "stimulate" the economy.
As far as the new "stimulus" plan: what does more government jobs (on top of the 15%+ of the total job market we have now) being paid for out of the tax-payers pockets to attempt to artificially prop something up have to do with "stimulating" the economy?
Desperate times sometimes calls for biting the bullet and having hard times. We are somehow under the belief that we, as people and as a country, should never have hard times. It's great when we don't, but we have to learn to dig deep and ride the rough patches, too.